Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Apr 10;92(14):956-9.

[Expression of phosphorylated STAT5 in bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells of patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria before and after in vitro G-CSF or SCF stimulation]

[Article in Chinese]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 22781567

[Expression of phosphorylated STAT5 in bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells of patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria before and after in vitro G-CSF or SCF stimulation]

[Article in Chinese]
Shao-xue Ding et al. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. .

Abstract

Objective: To study the expressions of phosphorylated STAT5 (P-STAT5) in CD34(+)CD59(-) and CD34(+)CD59(+) bone marrow cells of the patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) before and after in vitro G-CSF or SCF stimulation, then evaluate the functions of G-CSF and SCF receptors in PNH clone cells.

Methods: Bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNC) of 26 PNH patients and 14 normal controls were stimulated in vitro with G-CSF (100 ng/ml) or SCF (100 ng/ml) for 10 min. Before and after these stimulations, the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of P-STAT5 in CD34(+)CD59(+) BMMNC and CD34(+)CD59(-) BMMNC were measured by flow cytometry.

Results: (1) The P-STAT5 MFI was (24 ± 18) in unstimulated CD34(+)CD59(-) cells. And it was significantly lower than that in unstimulated CD34(+)CD59(+) cells of PNH patients (64 ± 49) and normal controls (61 ± 33) (both P < 0.01). No statistic difference existed between the latter two. (2) The P-STAT5 MFI was (36 ± 35) in G-CSF stimulated CD34(+)CD59(-) cells of PNH patients. And it was significantly lower than that in G-CSF stimulated CD34(+)CD59(+) cells of PNH patients (124 ± 84) and normal controls (116 ± 59) (both P < 0.01). There was no statistic difference between the latter two. (3) The P-STAT5 MFI was (34 ± 27) in SCF stimulated CD34(+)CD59(-) cells of PNH patients. And it was significantly lower than that in SCF stimulated CD34(+)CD59(+) cells of PNH patients (124 ± 97) and normal controls (128 ± 62) (both P < 0.01). And no statistic difference existed between the latter two. (4) The increased P-STAT5 MFI in G-CSF stimulated CD34(+)CD59(-) cells of PNH patients was significantly lower than that in G-CSF stimulated CD34(+)CD59(+) cells of PNH patients and normal controls (both P < 0.01). No statistic difference existed between the latter two. The increase of P-STAT5 MFI in SCF stimulated CD34(+)CD59(-) cells of PNH patients was significantly lower than that in SCF stimulated CD34(+)CD59(+) cells of PNH patients and normal controls (both P < 0.01). No statistic difference existed between the latter two.

Conclusion: There is a lower expression of P-STAT5 expressed in G-CSF or SCF stimulated PNH clone cells compared to that in normal clone cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources