Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul;62(600):e478-86.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X652346.

A simple approach to improve recording of concerns about child maltreatment in primary care records: developing a quality improvement intervention

Collaborators, Affiliations

A simple approach to improve recording of concerns about child maltreatment in primary care records: developing a quality improvement intervention

Jenny Woodman et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Information is lacking on how concerns about child maltreatment are recorded in primary care records.

Aim: To determine how the recording of child maltreatment concerns can be improved.

Design and setting: Development of a quality improvement intervention involving: clinical audit, a descriptive survey, telephone interviews, a workshop, database analyses, and consensus development in UK general practice.

Method: Descriptive analyses and incidence estimates were carried out based on 11 study practices and 442 practices in The Health Improvement Network (THIN). Telephone interviews, a workshop, and a consensus development meeting were conducted with lead GPs from 11 study practices.

Results: The rate of children with at least one maltreatment-related code was 8.4/1000 child years (11 study practices, 2009-2010), and 8.0/1000 child years (THIN, 2009-2010). Of 25 patients with known maltreatment, six had no maltreatment-related codes recorded, but all had relevant free text, scanned documents, or codes. When stating their reasons for undercoding maltreatment concerns, GPs cited damage to the patient relationship, uncertainty about which codes to use, and having concerns about recording information on other family members in the child's records. Consensus recommendations are to record the code 'child is cause for concern' as a red flag whenever maltreatment is considered, and to use a list of codes arranged around four clinical concepts, with an option for a templated short data entry form.

Conclusion: GPs under-record maltreatment-related concerns in children's electronic medical records. As failure to use codes makes it impossible to search or audit these cases, an approach designed to be simple and feasible to implement in UK general practice was recommended.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Age-adjusted incidence rates by practice, sorted by deprivation index (high to low).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Recommended coding pathway.

Comment in

References

    1. Gilbert R, Widom CS, Browne K, et al. Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries. Lancet. 2009;373(9657):68–81. - PubMed
    1. HM Government. Children Act 2004. London: HMSO; 2004.
    1. Office for National Statistics. NHS general medical practitioner consultations: by age, 2000/01. London: HMSO; 2001. Social Trends 33.
    1. Woodman J, Brandon M, Bailey S, et al. Healthcare use by children fatally or seriously harmed by child maltreatment: analysis of a national case series 2005-2007. Arch Dis Child. 2011;96(3):270–275. - PubMed
    1. Holge-Hazelton B, Tulinius C. Beyond the specific child. What is ‘a child’s case’ in general practice? Br J Gen Pract. 2010;60(570):e4–e9. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types