[Microsurgical therapy in tubal sterility]
- PMID: 2278215
[Microsurgical therapy in tubal sterility]
Abstract
In spite of the advances in the field of in vitro-fertilization, microsurgery still offers the best chances for treatment of tubal infertility. Because of the irreversible tubal wall pathology the results following microsurgical repair of the postinfectious tubal disease are limited to approximately 30%. No further improvement of the surgical technique is to be expected. According to the birth rate and the rate of extrauterine gestation, microsurgery gives the best results in the correction of filmy adhesions, fimbrial phimosis and proximal tubal occlusion. Distal tubal occlusion with development of hydrosalpinx and extremely thickness of the wall should be treated by IVF-ET. If higher rates of pregnancy are to be achieved in the future in tubal sterility, the treatment of methods (microsurgery, endoscopy and extracorporeal fertilization) must be combined.
Similar articles
-
[Usefulness and results of microsurgery in the treatment of female sterility].Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat. 1990 Jul-Aug;111(4):239-44. Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat. 1990. PMID: 2088155 Italian.
-
[Microsurgical treatment of tubal infertility].Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol. 1985 Jan-Apr;25(1-2):17-20. Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol. 1985. PMID: 4087927 Croatian.
-
Tubal microsurgery versus in vitro fertilization.Acta Eur Fertil. 1984 Jan-Feb;15(1):5-13. Acta Eur Fertil. 1984. PMID: 6730865 No abstract available.
-
Distal tubal occlusion: microsurgery versus in vitro fertilization--a review.Int J Fertil. 1988 Mar-Apr;33(2):107-15. Int J Fertil. 1988. PMID: 2898447 Review.
-
[Possibilities and limits of endoscopic fallopian tube surgery].Zentralbl Gynakol. 1995;117(12):663-9. Zentralbl Gynakol. 1995. PMID: 8585362 Review. German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical