Prospective randomised evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine combined with chemotherapy: a randomised phase II study of wild toad extract plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinomas
- PMID: 22782343
- PMCID: PMC3405220
- DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.283
Prospective randomised evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine combined with chemotherapy: a randomised phase II study of wild toad extract plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinomas
Abstract
Background: An intravenous formulated extract of the venom of the wild toad Bufo bufo gargarizans Cantor or Bufo melanostictus Schneider, huachansu, is currently used in China for the treatment of lung, liver, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers. We performed a randomised, single-blinded, phase II clinical study of huachansu plus gemcitabine versus placebo plus gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinomas.
Methods: Patients with tissue-proven locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic adenocarinoma were randomly assigned to receive either gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) on days 1, 8, and 15 with huachansu 20 ml m(-2) daily for 21 days (arm A) or placebo (arm B); treatment cycles were 28 days in length. Primary end point was 4-month progression-free overall survival (PFS); secondary end points were objective radiographical response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP), and toxicity.
Results: A total of 80 subjects were enrolled; 76 patients were evaluable (received at least 1 week therapy). Median overall survival was 160 days for arm A and 156 days for arm B (P=0.339); ORR was 9 and 3% in arms A and B, respectively (P=0.332), median TTP was 98 and 115 days, respectively (P=0.825); the median 4-month PFS was 99 and 98 days, respectively (P=0.679).
Conclusion: Huachansu when combined with gemcitabine did not improve the outcome of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic cancer.
© 2012 Cancer Research UK
Conflict of interest statement
PY and LC have received compensation from Anhui Jinchan Biochemistry Sharers Co. for consulting work.
Figures
References
-
- Boik J (2001) Using natural compounds in combination. In Natural Compounds in Cancer Therapy Farnell S (ed), pp 4–5. Oregon Medical Press: Princeton, MN
-
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program: Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health: National Cancer Institute, Available from: URL: http://www.eortc.be/services/doc/ctc/ctcaev3.pdf (accessed 20 December 2011)
-
- Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian B, Linn E, Bonomi A, Silberman M, Yellen SB, Winicour P, Brannon J, Eckberg K, Lloyd S, Purl S, Blendowski S, Goodman M, Barnicle M, Stewart I, McHale M, Bonomi P, Kaplan E, Taylor S, Thomas CR, Harris J (1993) The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 11: 570–579 - PubMed
-
- Cleeland CS, Mendoza TR, Wang XS, Chou C, Harle MT, Morrissey M, Engstrom MC (2000) Assessing symptom distress in cancer: The M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory. Cancer 89(7): 1634–1646 - PubMed
-
- Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc B 34: 187–220
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
