Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb;37(2):201-6.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1611-9. Epub 2012 Jul 11.

An international survey on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practices

Ofir Chechik  1 , Eyal Amar, Morsi Khashan, Ran Lador, Gil Eyal, Aviram Gold
Affiliations

An international survey on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practices

Ofir Chechik et al. Int Orthop. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Bone-patellar-tendon-bone (BPTB) autografting fixed with metal interference screws (IS) is the gold standard for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Advances in surgical technology provide a wide choice of grafts, fixation devices and surgical approaches.

Methods: Two-hundred and sixty-one orthopedic surgeons of ten subspecialties from 57 countries were surveyed on their choice of graft and fixation device, the number of reconstructed bundles, and arthroscopic portal. Their preferences were analyzed according to country of origin, field of expertise and seniority, and compared to current publications.

Results: Hamstring autografting was the most popular choice (63 %), then BPTB (26 %) and allograft (11 %). The anteromedial portal was preferred over the traditional transtibial portal (68 % versus 31 %). Two-thirds reported routinely performing a single-bundle graft reconstruction, compared to one-third who used the double-bundle technique. The Endo-button was the most common graft fixation method (40 %), followed by the bioabsorbable IS (34 %), metallic IS (12 %), rigidfix (10 %) and others (4 %). The preferences of hamstring tendon grafting and the anteromedial portal are not supported in the literature. Responses from North American and European surgeons were different from all the others.

Conclusions: Surgeon preferences in ACL reconstruction differ considerably worldwide. Common practice is not always supported by evidence-based publications.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alentorn-Geli E, Lajara F, Samitier G, Cugat R. The transtibial versus the anteromedial portal technique in the arthroscopic bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligamentreconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(8):1013–1037. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-0964-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Araki D, Kuroda R, Kubo S, Fujita N, Tei K, Nishimoto K, Hoshino Y, Matsushita T, Matsumoto T, Nagamune K, Kurosaka M. A prospective randomised study of anatomical single-bundle versus double-bundle anteriorcruciate ligament reconstruction: quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system. Int Orthop. 2011;35(3):439–446. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1110-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baer GS, Harner CD. Clinical outcomes of allograft versus autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med. 2007;26(4):661–681. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2007.06.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bedi A, Musahl V, Steuber V, Kendoff D, Choi D, Allen AA, Pearle AD, Altchek DW. Transtibial versus anteromedial portal reaming in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:an anatomic and biomechanicalevaluation of surgical technique. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(3):380–390. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.07.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Biau DJ, Katsahian S, Kartus J, Harilainen A, Feller JA, Sajovic M, Ejerhed L, Zaffagnini S, Röpke M, Nizard R. Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for reconstructing the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis based on individual patient data. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(12):2470–2478. doi: 10.1177/0363546509333006. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms