Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan;3(1):24-30.
Epub 2012 May 3.

Management of the Schneiderian membrane perforation during the maxillary sinus elevation procedure: a case report

Affiliations

Management of the Schneiderian membrane perforation during the maxillary sinus elevation procedure: a case report

Deborah Meleo et al. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2012 Jan.

Abstract

The maxillary sinus elevation is a standard and predictable procedure allowing the realization of dental implant rehabilitation in patients with severe bone atrophy in the lateral-posterior areas of the maxilla. Despite the presence of validated surgical methods and the broad availability of biomaterials, the procedures aimed at increasing the bone volume by lateral antrostomy still entail complications with different degrees of relevance. The prosthetic and surgical outcome is based on a successful coping with these aspects. The perforation of the Schneiderian membrane is one of the most frequent events for which a variety of protocols and approaches have been suggested by different authors. In this work is presented a case study in which a technique to repair the sinus mucosa laceration occurring during a maxillary sinus elevation procedure has been successfully adopted.

Keywords: Schneiderian membrane; maxillary sinus augmentation; sinus lift complications; underwood septa.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pre-operative orthopantomogram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Maxillary sinus membrane perforation
Figure 3
Figure 3
A resorbable membrane of freeze-dried bovine pericardium positioned according to modified pouch technique.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A human-derived bone paste in blocks, called Bioset, containing demineralized bone matrix (DBM).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Plastic consistency and easy manipulation of Bioset.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Maxillary sinus filled with Bioset.
Figure 7
Figure 7
A second resorbable membrane applied above the antrostomy.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Histology of bone neoformation at six months after sinus lift (40x, H&E).
Figure 9
Figure 9
Ortopantomogram at six months after implants placement
Figure 10
Figure 10
Paraxial views of TC dentascan at one year after prosthetic rehabilitation.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Panoramic views of TC dentascan at one year after prosthetic rehabilitation.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Clinical result at two years after implant surgery.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Froum SJ, Wallace SS, Elian N, Cho SC, Tarnow DP. Comparison of mineralized cancellous bone allograft (Puros) and anorganic bovine bone matrix (Bio-Oss) for sinus augmentation: histomorphometry at 26 to 32 weeks after grafting. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006 Dec;26(6):543–51. - PubMed
    1. Shulman LB, Jensen OT. Sinus Graft Consensus Conference. Introduction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13(suppl):5, 6. - PubMed
    1. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Rees J, Karasoulos D, Felice P, Alissa R, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. Effectiveness of sinus lift procedures for dental implant rehabilitation: a Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010;3(1):7–26. - PubMed
    1. Pignataro M, Mantovani M, Torretta S, Felisati G, Sambataro G. ENT assessment in the integrated management of candidate for (maxillary) sinus lift. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2008;28:110–119. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M. Methods to treat the edentulous posterior maxilla: implants with sinus grafting. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(4):867–71. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources