Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;27(1):166-76.
doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.689953. Epub 2012 Jul 12.

Anxiety modulates the effects of emotion and attention on early vision

Affiliations

Anxiety modulates the effects of emotion and attention on early vision

Emma Ferneyhough et al. Cogn Emot. 2013.

Abstract

At attended locations emotion and attention interact to benefit contrast sensitivity, a basic visual dimension. Whether there are associated costs at unattended locations is unknown. Furthermore, emotion and attention affect response time, and anxiety modulates these effects. We investigated how trait-anxiety influences the interaction of emotion and attention on contrast sensitivity. On each trial, non-predictive pre-cues (neutral or fearful faces) directed exogenous attention to four contrast-varying, tilted stimuli (Gabor patches). Attention was cued toward the target (valid), a distracter (invalid), or distributed over all locations. Observers discriminated target orientation, and completed self-report measures of anxiety. Effects of fearful expressions were mediated by trait anxiety. Only high-trait-anxious individuals showed decreased target contrast sensitivity after attention was diverted to a distracter by a fearful cue, and anxiety score correlated with degree of impairment across participants. This indicates that increasing anxiety exacerbates threat-related attentional costs to visual perception, hampering processing at non-threat-related locations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial sequence. Images not to scale; contrast, target Gabor tilt and spatial frequency emphasized for clarity; spatial position of cues and targets not to scale.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A–D: Cueing effects: all observers and by anxiety. The Y-axis is normalized contrast sensitivity. The X-axis is spatial cueing condition. Black bars indicate fear face cues and white bars indicate neutral face cues. (*) indicates a significant two-tailed t-test. Error bars are ± 1 SE of mean. A) All observers; B) high trait anxious observers; C) middle trait anxious observers; and D) low trait anxious observers.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Gray bars Distribution of anxiety scores across the sample. The Y-axis is the number of participants as a function of trait anxiety score (X-axis). Black circles: Correlation of anxiety score and invalid cue index. The Y-axis is the invalid cue index (fear-invalid minus neutral-invalid normalized contrast sensitivity). A positive number indicates fear-invalid cues benefited contrast sensitivity whereas a negative number indicates they incurred a cost to contrast sensitivity.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anderson AK, Phelps EA. Lesions of the human amygdala impair enhanced perception of emotionally salient events. Nature. 2001;411(6835):305–309. - PubMed
    1. Bishop SJ. Trait anxiety and impoverished prefrontal control of attention. Nat Neurosci. 2008;12(1):92–98. - PubMed
    1. Bishop SJ, Duncan J, Lawrence AD. State anxiety modulation of the amygdala response to unattended threat-related stimuli. J Neurosci. 2004;24(46):10364–10368. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bocanegra BR, Zeelenberg R. Emotion improves and impairs early vision. Psych Science. 2009;20(6):707–713. - PubMed
    1. Bocanegra BR, Zeelenberg R. Emotional cues enhance the attentional effects on spatial and temporal resolution. Psychon Bull Rev. 2011;18(6):1071–1076. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types