Blockade of lymphocyte chemotaxis in visceral graft-versus-host disease
- PMID: 22784116
- PMCID: PMC3568501
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1201248
Blockade of lymphocyte chemotaxis in visceral graft-versus-host disease
Abstract
Background: Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major barrier to successful allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). The chemokine receptor CCR5 appears to play a role in alloreactivity. We tested whether CCR5 blockade would be safe and limit GVHD in humans.
Methods: We tested the in vitro effect of the CCR5 antagonist maraviroc on lymphocyte function and chemotaxis. We then enrolled 38 high-risk patients in a single-group phase 1 and 2 study of reduced-intensity allogeneic HSCT that combined maraviroc with standard GVHD prophylaxis.
Results: Maraviroc inhibited CCR5 internalization and lymphocyte chemotaxis in vitro without impairing T-cell function or formation of hematopoietic-cell colonies. In 35 patients who could be evaluated, the cumulative incidence rate (±SE) of grade II to IV acute GVHD was low at 14.7±6.2% on day 100 and 23.6±7.4% on day 180. Acute liver and gut GVHD were not observed before day 100 and remained uncommon before day 180, resulting in a low cumulative incidence of grade III or IV GVHD on day 180 (5.9±4.1%). The 1-year rate of death that was not preceded by disease relapse was 11.7±5.6% without excessive rates of relapse or infection. Serum from patients receiving maraviroc prevented CCR5 internalization by CCL5 and blocked T-cell chemotaxis in vitro, providing evidence of antichemotactic activity.
Conclusions: In this study, inhibition of lymphocyte trafficking was a specific and potentially effective new strategy to prevent visceral acute GVHD. (Funded by Pfizer and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00948753.).
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Frey reports receiving lecture fees from Pfizer; Dr. Stadt-mauer, consulting fees from Pfizer; Dr. Vonderheide, grant support from Pfizer; and Dr. Porter, consulting fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb and lecture fees from Celgene and Millennium. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
Comment in
-
Blockade of chemotaxis in graft-versus-host disease.N Engl J Med. 2012 Oct 25;367(17):1667; author reply 1667-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1209665. N Engl J Med. 2012. PMID: 23094739 No abstract available.
-
Blockade of CCR5 to protect the liver graft in HIV/HCV co-infected patients.J Hepatol. 2013 Sep;59(3):613-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.03.034. Epub 2013 Apr 9. J Hepatol. 2013. PMID: 23583366 No abstract available.
References
-
- Johnston L. Acute graft-versus-host disease: differing risk with differing graft sources and conditioning intensity. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2008;21:177–92. - PubMed
-
- Ferrara JL, Levy R, Chao NJ. Pathophysiologic mechanisms of acute graft-vs.-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 1999;5:347–56. - PubMed
-
- Weisdorf D. GVHD the nuts and bolts. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2007:62–7. - PubMed
-
- Sackstein R. A revision of Billingham's tenets: the central role of lymphocyte migration in acute graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006;12:2–8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical