Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD002111.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002111.pub3.

Biofeedback and/or sphincter exercises for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Biofeedback and/or sphincter exercises for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults

Christine Norton et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Faecal incontinence is a particularly embarrassing and distressing condition with significant medical, social and economic implications. Anal sphincter exercises (pelvic floor muscle training) and biofeedback therapy have been used to treat the symptoms of people with faecal incontinence. However, standards of treatment are still lacking and the magnitude of alleged benefits has yet to be established.

Objectives: To determine the effects of biofeedback and/or anal sphincter exercises/pelvic floor muscle training for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Trials Register (searched 24 January 2012) which contains trials from searching CENTRAL, MEDLINE and handsearching of conference proceedings; and the reference lists of relevant articles.

Selection criteria: All randomised or quasi-randomised trials evaluating biofeedback and/or anal sphincter exercises in adults with faecal incontinence.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors assessed the risk of bias of eligible trials and two review authors independently extracted data from the included trials. A wide range of outcome measures were considered.

Main results: Twenty one eligible studies were identified with a total of 1525 participants. About half of the trials had low risk of bias for randomisation and allocation concealment.One small trial showed that biofeedback plus exercises was better than exercises alone (RR for failing to achieve full continence 0.70, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.94).One small trial showed that adding biofeedback to electrical stimulation was better than electrical stimulation alone (RR for failing to achieve full continence 0.47, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.65).The combined data of two trials showed that the number of people failing to achieve full continence was significantly lower when electrical stimulation was added to biofeedback compared against biofeedback alone (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.78).Sacral nerve stimulation was better than conservative management which included biofeedback and PFMT (at 12 months the incontinence episodes were significantly fewer with sacral nerve stimulation (MD 6.30, 95% CI 2.26 to 10.34).There was not enough evidence as to whether there was a difference in outcome between any method of biofeedback or exercises. There are suggestions that rectal volume discrimination training improves continence more than sham training. Further conclusions are not warranted from the available data.

Authors' conclusions: The limited number of identified trials together with methodological weaknesses of many do not allow a definitive assessment of the role of anal sphincter exercises and biofeedback therapy in the management of people with faecal incontinence. We found some evidence that biofeedback and electrical stimulation may enhance the outcome of treatment compared to electrical stimulation alone or exercises alone. Exercises appear to be less effective than an implanted sacral nerve stimulator. While there is a suggestion that some elements of biofeedback therapy and sphincter exercises may have a therapeutic effect, this is not certain. Larger well-designed trials are needed to enable safe conclusions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The lead review author is an author of a study included in the review.

Figures

1
1
PRISMA study flow diagram.
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Anal sphincter exercises/PFMT with or without biofeedback versus no treatment, Outcome 1 Number of people failing to achieve full continence (worse, unchanged or improved).
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Anal sphincter exercises/PFMT with or without biofeedback versus no treatment, Outcome 2 Number of people with no improvement in incontinence status (worse or unchanged).
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Anal sphincter exercises/PFMT with or without biofeedback versus no treatment, Outcome 3 Number of incontinence episodes per week.
1.8
1.8. Analysis
Comparison 1 Anal sphincter exercises/PFMT with or without biofeedback versus no treatment, Outcome 8 Sensory threshold (rectal balloon distension ‐ ml).
2.7
2.7. Analysis
Comparison 2 Anal sphincter exercises/PFMT with or without biofeedback versus any other treatment alone, Outcome 7 Number of people dissatisfied with the treatment.
3.1
3.1. Analysis
Comparison 3 Anal sphincter exercises/PFMT with or without biofeedback and another treatment versus any other treatment alone, Outcome 1 Number of people failing to achieve full continence (worse, unchanged or improved).
3.4
3.4. Analysis
Comparison 3 Anal sphincter exercises/PFMT with or without biofeedback and another treatment versus any other treatment alone, Outcome 4 Number of incontinence episodes per week.
3.5
3.5. Analysis
Comparison 3 Anal sphincter exercises/PFMT with or without biofeedback and another treatment versus any other treatment alone, Outcome 5 Number of pad changes required per week.
3.6
3.6. Analysis
Comparison 3 Anal sphincter exercises/PFMT with or without biofeedback and another treatment versus any other treatment alone, Outcome 6 Incontinence score.
3.15
3.15. Analysis
Comparison 3 Anal sphincter exercises/PFMT with or without biofeedback and another treatment versus any other treatment alone, Outcome 15 General health measures.
3.16
3.16. Analysis
Comparison 3 Anal sphincter exercises/PFMT with or without biofeedback and another treatment versus any other treatment alone, Outcome 16 Condition specific quality of life measures.
3.17
3.17. Analysis
Comparison 3 Anal sphincter exercises/PFMT with or without biofeedback and another treatment versus any other treatment alone, Outcome 17 Psychological health measures.
3.19
3.19. Analysis
Comparison 3 Anal sphincter exercises/PFMT with or without biofeedback and another treatment versus any other treatment alone, Outcome 19 Satisfaction with treatment (VAS).
4.1
4.1. Analysis
Comparison 4 Anal sphincter exercises/PFMT with or without biofeedback and another treatment versus exercises with or without biofeedback, Outcome 1 Number of people failing to achieve full continence (worse, unchanged or improved).
4.2
4.2. Analysis
Comparison 4 Anal sphincter exercises/PFMT with or without biofeedback and another treatment versus exercises with or without biofeedback, Outcome 2 Number of people with no improvement in incontinence status (worse or unchanged).
4.6
4.6. Analysis
Comparison 4 Anal sphincter exercises/PFMT with or without biofeedback and another treatment versus exercises with or without biofeedback, Outcome 6 Incontinence score.
5.1
5.1. Analysis
Comparison 5 Anal sphincter exercises/PFMT and biofeedback versus anal sphincter exercises/PFMT alone, Outcome 1 Number of people failing to achieve full continence (worse, unchanged or improved).
5.3
5.3. Analysis
Comparison 5 Anal sphincter exercises/PFMT and biofeedback versus anal sphincter exercises/PFMT alone, Outcome 3 Number of people dissatisfied with the treatment.

Update of

References

References to studies included in this review

Bartlett 2011 {published data only}
    1. Bartlett L, Sloots K, Nowak M, Ho YH. Biofeedback for fecal incontinence: a randomized study comparing exercise regimens. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2011;54(7):846‐56. - PubMed
    1. Bartlett LM, Sloots K, Nowak M, Ho YH. Biofeedback therapy for faecal incontinence: a rural and regional perspective. Rural Remote Health 2011;11(2):1630. - PubMed
Bols 2011 {published data only}
    1. Bols E, Berghmans B, Hendriks E, Bie RA, Baeten C. Rectal balloon training as add‐on therapy to pelvic floor muscle training in adults with faecal incontinence: a randomized controlled trial (Abstract number RR‐PO‐311‐21‐Wed). Physiotherapy. 2011; Vol. 97 Suppl S1, issue Suppl S1. - PubMed
    1. Bols E, Berghmans B, Bie R, Govaert B, Wunnik B, Heymans M, et al. Rectal balloon training as add‐on therapy to pelvic floor muscle training in adults with faecal incontinence: a randomised controlled trial (Abstract number 211). Neurourology and Urodynamics 2011;30(6):1093‐4. - PubMed
    1. Bols E, Hendriks E, Bie R, Baeten C, Berghmans B. Predictors of a favourable outcome of physiotherapy in faecal incontinence: secondary analysis of a randomised trial (Abstract number 212). Neurourology and Urodynamics 2011;30(6):1095‐6. - PubMed
Davis 2004 {published data only}
    1. Davis KJ, Kumar D, Poloniecki J. Adjuvant biofeedback following anal sphincter repair: a randomized study. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2004;20(5):539‐49. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Fynes 1999 {published data only}
    1. Fynes M, Marshall K, Cassidy M, O'Connell R, O'Herlihy C. A prospective randomised study comparing the effect of augmented biofeedback with sensory biofeedback alone on faecal incontinence following obstetric trauma. Proceedings of the International Continence Society (ICS), 28th Annual Meeting, 1998 Sep 14‐17, Jerusalem, Israel 1998:151.
    1. Fynes MM, Marshall K, Cassidy M, Behan M, Walsh D, O'Connell PR, et al. A prospective, randomized study comparing the effect of augmented biofeedback with sensory biofeedback alone on fecal incontinence after obstetric trauma. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 1999;42(6):753‐61. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Healy 2006 {published data only}
    1. Healy CF, Brannigan AE, Connolly EM, Eng M, O'sullivan MJ, McNamara DA, et al. The effects of low‐frequency endo‐anal electrical stimulation on faecal incontinence: a prospective study. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 2006;21(8):802‐6. - PubMed
Heymen 2000 {published data only}
    1. Heymen S, Pikarsky AJ, Weiss EG, Vickers D, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. A prospective randomized trial comparing four biofeedback techniques for patients with faecal incontinence. Colorectal Disease 2000;2(2):88‐92. - PubMed
Heymen 2009 {published data only}
    1. Heymen S, Scarlett Y, Jones K, Ringel Y, Drossman D, Whitehead WE. Randomized controlled trial shows biofeedback to be superior to pelvic floor exercises for fecal incontinence. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2009;52(10):1730‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Hinninghofen 2003 {published data only}
    1. Hinninghofen H, Wietek B, Jehle EC, Enck P. [Quality of life in patients with incontinence of faeces: Bio‐feedback training versus surgical measures] (Abstract number P103). Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie 2003;41(8):783.
Ilnyckyj 2005 {published data only}
    1. Ilnyckyj A, Fachnie E, Tougas G. A randomized‐controlled trial comparing an educational intervention alone vs education and biofeedback in the management of faecal incontinence in women. Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2005;17(1):58‐63. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Latimer 1984 {published data only}
    1. Latimer PR, Campbell D, Kasperski J. A components analysis of biofeedback in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Biofeedback and Self‐Regulation 1984;9(3):311‐24. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Mahony 2004 {published data only}
    1. Mahony R, Malone P, Nalty J, Cassidy M, O'Connell PR, O'Herlihy C. Prospective randomized comparison of intra‐anal electromyographic biofeedback and intra‐anal electromyographic biofeedback augmented with electrical stimulation of the anal sphincter. [Miscellaneous]. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003;189(6):S71. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
    1. Mahony RT, Malone PA, Nalty J, Behan M, O'Connell PR, O'Herlihy C. Randomized clinical trial of intra‐anal electromyographic biofeedback physiotherapy with intra‐anal electromyographic biofeedback augmented with electrical stimulation of the anal sphincter in the early treatment of postpartum fecal incontinence. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2004;191(3):885‐90. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Markwell 2006 {published data only}
    1. Markwell S, Unkles E, Hitchman K, Lincoln D, Chumbley J, Theile G, et al. A randomised controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of specific muscle rehabilitation in people with faecal incontinence (report amended Jun 2007). Canberra, Australia: Department of Health and Ageing, Australian Government, 2006. Available from: http://www.bladderbowel.gov.au/ncp/ncms/projects/phases/intervention/mus... (last accessed 9 May 2012).
McHugh 1986 {published data only}
    1. Diamant NE. personal communication 1999.
    1. McHugh S, Walma K, Diamant NE. Faecal incontinence: a controlled trial of biofeedback. Gastroenterology 1986;90:1545.
Miner 1990 {published data only}
    1. Miner PB, Donnelly TC, Read NW. Investigation of mode of action of biofeedback in treatment of fecal incontinence. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 1990;35(10):1291‐8. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Naimy 2007 {published data only}
    1. Naimy N, Lindam AT, Bakka A, Faerden AE, Wiik P, Carlsen E, et al. Biofeedback vs. electrostimulation in the treatment of postdelivery anal incontinence: a randomized, clinical trial. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2007;50(12):2040‐6. - PubMed
Norton 2003 {published data only}
    1. Norton C, Chelvanayagam S, Kamm M. Randomised controlled trial of biofeedback for faecal incontinence (Abstract). Neurourology and Urodynamics 2002;21(4):295‐6. [MEDLINE: ]
    1. Norton C, Chelvanayagam S, Wilson‐Barnett J, Redfern S, Kamm MA. Randomized controlled trial of biofeedback for fecal incontinence.[see comment]. Gastroenterology 2003;125(5):1320‐9. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Schwandner 2010 {published data only}
    1. Schwandner T, Konig IR, Heimerl T, Kierer W, Roblick M, Bouchard R, et al. Triple target treatment (3T) is more effective than biofeedback alone for anal incontinence: the 3T‐AI study. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2010;53(7):1007‐16. - PubMed
Schwandner 2011 {published data only}
    1. Schwandner T, Hemmelmann C, Heimerl T, Kierer W, Kolbert G, Vonthein R, et al. Triple‐target treatment versus low‐frequency electrostimulation for anal incontinence: a randomized, controlled trial. Deutsches Arzteblatt International 2011;108(39):653‐60. - PMC - PubMed
Solomon 2003 {published data only}
    1. Solomon MJ, Pager CK, Rex J, Roberts R, Manning J. Randomized, controlled trial of biofeedback with anal manometry, transanal ultrasound, or pelvic floor retraining with digital guidance alone in the treatment of mild to moderate fecal incontinence. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2003;46(6):703‐10. - PubMed
Tjandra 2008 {published data only}
    1. Tjandra J, Lim J, Green C, Carey M. Sacral neuromodulation in patients with faecal incontinence: a randomized controlled study on efficacy and quality of life. Colorectal Disease 2005;7 Suppl 1:31.
    1. Tjandra JJ, Chan MK, Yeh CH, Murray‐Green C. Sacral nerve stimulation is more effective than optimal medical therapy for severe fecal incontinence: a randomized, controlled study. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2008;51(5):494‐502. - PubMed
Whitehead 1985 {published data only}
    1. Whitehead WE. personal communication 1999.
    1. Whitehead WE, Burgio KL, Engel BT. Biofeedback treatment of fecal incontinence in geriatric patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1985;33(5):320‐4. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Bates‐Jensen 2003 {published data only}
    1. Bates‐Jensen BM, Alessi CA, Al Samarrai NR, Schnelle JF. The effects of an exercise and incontinence intervention on skin health outcomes in nursing home residents. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2003;51(3):348‐55. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Byrne 2002 {published data only}
    1. Byrne CM, Pager CK, Rex J, Roberts R, Solomon MJ. Assessment of quality of life in the treatment of patients with neuropathic fecal incontinence. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2002;45(11):1431‐6. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Chase 2004 {published data only}
    1. Chase J, Sherburn M, Button B. Development of intervention and education program for incontinence in adult women with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cystic fibrosis. Project 34. Canberra, Australia: Department of Health and Ageing, Australian Government, 2004. Available from: http://www.bladderbowel.gov.au/ncp/ncms/projects/phases/intervention/inc... (last accessed 9 May 2012).
Christensen 2009 {published data only}
    1. Christensen P, Andreasen J, Ehlers L. Cost‐effectiveness of transanal irrigation versus conservative bowel management for spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord 2009;47(2):138‐43. - PubMed
Cox 1996 {published data only}
    1. Cox DJ, Sutphen J, Ling W, Quillian W, Borowitz S. Additive benefits of laxative, toilet training, and biofeedback therapies in the treatment of childhood encopresis. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 1996;21(5):659‐70. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Cox 2003 {published data only}
    1. Cox DJ, Lucas V, Ritterband LM, Borowitz S, Sutphen J, Kovatchev B, et al. Internet‐based treatment of early childhood fecal incontinence. metaRegister of Controlled Trials 2003.
Croffie 2005 {published data only}
    1. Croffie JM, Ammar MS, Pfefferkorn MD, Horn D, Klipsch A, Fitzgerald JF, et al. Assessment of the effectiveness of biofeedback in children with dyssynergic defecation and recalcitrant constipation/encopresis: does home biofeedback improve long‐term outcomes. Clinical Pediatrics 2005;44(1):63‐71. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Dannecker 2004 {published data only}
    1. Dannecker C. [The effect of the pelvic floor training device Epi‐No on the maternal pelvic floor function six months after childbirth ‐ follow‐up study of a randomised controlled trial]. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 2004;64(11):1192‐8. [MEDLINE: ]
Enck 1994 {published data only}
    1. Enck P, Daublin G, Lubke HJ, Strohmeyer G. Long‐term efficacy of biofeedback training for faecal incontinence. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 1994;37(10):997‐1001. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Fang 2003 {published data only}
    1. Fang Y, Chen X, Li H, Lin J, Huang R, Zeng J. A study on additional early physiotherapy after stroke and factors affecting functional recovery. Clinical Rehabilitation 2003;17(6):608‐17. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Gaier 2010 {published data only}
    1. Gaier L, Lamberti G, Giraudo D. Pelvic floor muscle training during pregnancy to prevent urinary pelvic floor dysfunctions (Abstract). Neurourology and Urodynamics 2010;29(2S):64‐5.
Glazener 2005 {published data only}
    1. Glazener CM, Herbison GP, MacArthur C, Grant A, Wilson PD. Randomised controlled trial of conservative management of postnatal urinary and faecal incontinence: six year follow up. BMJ 12‐2‐2005;330(7487):337‐40. [MEDLINE: ] - PMC - PubMed
    1. Glazener CM, Herbison GP, Wilson PD, MacArthur C, Lang GD, Gee H, et al. Conservative management of persistent postnatal urinary and faecal incontinence: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2001;323(7313):593‐6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Glazener CM, Herbison GP, Wilson PD, MacArthur C, Lang GD, Gee H, et al. Conservative management of persistent postnatal urinary and faecal incontinence: randomised controlled trial [Extended electronic version]. eBMJ 2001;323:1‐5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilson PD, Glazener C, McGee M, Herbison P, MacArthur C, Grant A. Randomised controlled trial of conservative management of postnatal urinary and faecal incontinence: long term follow‐up study (Abstract). Neurourology and Urodynamics 2002;21(4):370.
Gouldthorpe {published data only}
    1. Gouldthorpe H. QA physiotherapy abdominal muscle assessment during and after pregnancy: Part 4 (Abstract). Australian and New Zealand Continence Journal YR:2003. 9 Vol. 9, issue 4:92. [MEDLINE: ]
Harari 2004 {published data only}
    1. Harari D, Norton C, Lockwood L, Swift C. Treatment of constipation and fecal incontinence in stroke patients: randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2004;35(11):2549‐55. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Heymen 2003 {published data only}
    1. Heymen S, Whitehead WE, Scarlett Y. Elevated Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scores predict biofeedback treatment failure for fecal incontinence and constipation (Abstract number W1511). Gastroenterology 2003;124(4 (Suppl 1)):A685.
Heymen 2004 {published data only}
    1. Heymen S, Scarlett Y, Whitehead WE. Anorectal physiology predicts response to conservative medical management of fecal incontinence (Abstract). Gastroenterology 2004;126(4 (Suppl 2)):A363. - PubMed
Heymen 2004a {published data only}
    1. Heymen S, Scarlett Y, Whitehead WE. Education and medical management resolve fecal incontinence in 35%, but depression and greater symptom severity predict a poor response (Abstract). Gastroenterology 2004;126(4 (Suppl 2)):A480.
Heymen 2005 {published data only}
    1. Heymen S, Scarlett Y, Jones K, Drossman D, Ringel Y, Whitehead WE. Randomized controlled trial shows biofeedback to be superior to alternative treatments for patients with pelvic floor dyssenergia‐type constipation (Abstract number S1838). Gastroenterology 2005;128 Suppl 2:A266. - PubMed
Jorge 1994 {published data only}
    1. Jorge JM, Wexner SD, Morgado PJ, James K, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG. Optimization of sphincter function after the ileoanal reservoir procedure. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 1994;37(5):419‐23. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Klijn 2003 {published data only}
    1. Klijn AJ, Winkler‐Seinstra PL, Vijverberg MA, Uiterwaal CS, Jong TP. Results of behavioral therapy combined with homeflow biofeedback for non‐neuropathic bladder sphincter dysfunction, a prospective randomized study in 143 patients (Abstract). Proceedings of the International Continence Society (ICS), 33rd Annual Meeting, 5‐9 Oct, Florence. 2003:176‐7.
Leroi 2005 {published data only}
    1. Leroi AM, Parc Y, Lehur PA, Mion F, Barth X, Rullier E, et al. Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: results of a multicenter double‐blind crossover study. Annals of Surgery 2005;242(5):662‐9. [MEDLINE: ] - PMC - PubMed
Levy‐Storms 2007 {published data only}
    1. Levy‐Storms L, Schnelle JF, Simmons SF. What do family members notice following an intervention to improve mobility and incontinence care for nursing home residents? An analysis of open‐ended comments. Gerontologist 2007;47(1):14‐20. - PubMed
Loening‐Baucke 1988 {published data only}
    1. Loening‐Baucke V, Desch L, Wolraich M. Biofeedback training for patients with myelomeningocele and faecal incontinence. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 1988;30(6):781‐90. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Loening‐Baucke 1990a {published data only}
    1. Loening‐Baucke V. Biofeedback therapy for faecal incontinence. Digestive Diseases 1990;8(2):112‐24. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Loening‐Baucke 1990b {published data only}
    1. Loening‐Baucke V. Efficacy of biofeedback training in improving faecal incontinence and anorectal physiologic function. Gut 1990;31(12):1395‐402. [MEDLINE: ] - PMC - PubMed
Loening‐Baucke 1995 {published data only}
    1. Loening‐Baucke V. Biofeedback treatment for chronic constipation and encopresis in childhood: long‐term outcome. Pediatrics 1995;96(1):105‐10. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Markland 2009 {published data only}
    1. Markland AD, Richter HE, Burgio KL, Bragg C, Hernandez AL, Subak LL. Fecal incontinence in obese women with urinary incontinence: prevalence and role of dietary fiber intake. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009;200(5):566.e1‐6. - PMC - PubMed
Mathew 2004 {published data only}
    1. Mathew R. A phase III, multicentre, single blind, randomised controlled trial in the use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy versus biofeedback therapy in patients with chronic faecal incontinence associated with pudendal neuropathy. metaRegister of Controlled Trials 2004.
Norton 2006 {published data only}
    1. Norton C, Gibbs A, Kamm M. A randomised controlled trial of anal electrical stimulation for faecal incontinence (Abstract number 474). Proceedings of the 35th Annual International Continence Society (ICS), 28 Aug ‐ 2 Sept, Montreal. 2005. [MEDLINE: ]
    1. Norton C, Gibbs A, Kamm MA. Randomized, controlled trial of anal electrical stimulation for fecal incontinence. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2006;49(2):190‐6. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
O'Brien 2005 {published data only}
    1. O'Brien PE, Dixon JB, Skinner S, Laurie C, Khera A, Fonda D. A prospective randomised controlled clinical trial of placement of the artificial bowel sphincter (Acticon). Australia: National Continence Management Strategy, Department of Health and Ageing, Australian Government, 2005.
    1. O'Brien PE, Dixon JB, Skinner S, Laurie C, Khera A, Fonda D. A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial of placement of the artificial bowel sphincter (Acticon Neosphincter) for the control of fecal incontinence. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2004;47(11):1852‐60. - PubMed
Oresland 1988 {published data only}
    1. Oresland T, Fasth S, Hulten L, Nordgren S, Swenson L, Akervall S. Does balloon dilatation and anal sphincter training improve ileo‐ anal pouch function?. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 1988;3(3):153‐7. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Osterberg 2004 {published data only}
    1. Osterberg A, Edebol Eeg‐Olofsson K, Hallden M, Graf W. Randomized clinical trial comparing conservative and surgical treatment of neurogenic faecal incontinence. British Journal of Surgery 2004;91(9):1131‐7. - PubMed
Pager 2002 {published data only}
    1. Pager CK, Solomon MJ, Rex J, Roberts RA. Long‐term outcomes of pelvic floor exercise and biofeedback treatment for patients with fecal incontinence. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2002;45(8):997‐1003. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Pourmomeny 2011 {published data only}
    1. Pourmomeny AA, Emami MH, Amooshahi M, Adibi P. Comparing the efficacy of biofeedback and balloon‐assisted training in the treatment of dyssynergic defecation. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology 2011;25(2):89‐92. - PMC - PubMed
Powell 2003 {published data only}
    1. Powell M. Augmented biofeedback and sensory biofeedback in faecal incontinence: a pilot study (Abstract). Australian and New Zealand Continence Journal 2003;9(4):77‐8.
Richter 2011 {published data only}
    1. Richter HE. Behavioral therapy versus usual care in primiparous women with anal sphincter tears and fecal incontinence: a randomized trial. www.ClinicalTrials.gov [accessed 16 September 2011] 2011.
Ritterband 2003 {published data only}
    1. Ritterband LM, Cox DJ, Walker LS, Kovatchev B, McKnight L, Patel K, Borowitz S, Sutphen J. An Internet intervention as adjunctive therapy for pediatric encopresis. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology 2003;71(5):910‐7. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Roth 1999 {published data only}
    1. Roth I, Hasse C, Bohrer T, Stinner B, Rothmund M. Dynamic threshold current therapy ‐ a new method for tonizing the striated musculature of the pelvic floor for anorectal incontinence [abstract number O7]. Langenbeck's Archiv fur Chirurgie/Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie 1999;384(5):496.
Schnelle 2002 {published data only}
    1. Schnelle JF, Alessi CA, Simmons SF, Al Samarrai NR, Beck JC, Ouslander JG. Translating clinical research into practice: a randomized controlled trial of exercise and incontinence care with nursing home residents.[comment]. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2002;50(9):1476‐83. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Schnelle 2003 {published data only}
    1. Schnelle JF, Kapur K, Alessi C, Osterweil D, Beck JG, Al Samarrai NR, et al. Does an exercise and incontinence intervention save healthcare costs in a nursing home population?[comment]. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2003;51(2):161‐8. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Simmons 2005 {published data only}
    1. Simmons SF, Ouslander JG. Resident and family satisfaction with incontinence and mobility care: sensitivity to intervention effects?. Gerontologist 2005;45(3):318‐26. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
    1. Simmons SF, Schnelle JF. Effects of an exercise and scheduled‐toileting intervention on appetite and constipation in nursing home residents. Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging 2004;8(2):116‐21. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Solomon 2000 {published data only}
    1. Solomon M, Rex J, Manning J, Eyers A, Stewart P, Roberts R. Randomised controlled trial of biofeedback (manometry vs transanal US) compared with pelvic floor exercises for faecal incontinence (Abstract). Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery 2000;70(Suppl May):A56. [MEDLINE: ]
    1. Solomon MJ, Rex J, Eyers AA, Stewart P, Roberts R. Biofeedback for fecal incontinence using transanal ultrasonography: novel approach. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2000;43(6):788‐92. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Surh 1998 {published data only}
    1. Surh S, Kienle P, Stern J, Herfarth C. [Passive electrostimulation therapy of the anal sphincter is inferior to active biofeedback training]. [German] [Die passive Elektrostimulationstherapie des Analsphinkters ist dem aktiven Biofeedbacktraining unterlegen]. Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie ‐ Supplement ‐ Kongressband 1998;115:976‐8. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Tekeoglu 1998 {published data only}
    1. Tekeoglu Y, Adak B, Goksoy T. Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on Barthel Activities of Daily Living (ADL) index score following stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation 1998;12(4):277‐80. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
van der Plas 1996a {published data only}
    1. Plas RN, Benninga MA, Buller HA, Bossuyt PM, Akkermans LM, Redekop WK, et al. Biofeedback training in treatment of childhood constipation: a randomised controlled study. Lancet 1996;348(9030):776‐80. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
van der Plas 1996b {published data only}
    1. Plas RN, Benninga MA, Redekop WK, Taminiau JA, Buller HA. Randomised trial of biofeedback training for encopresis. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1996;75(5):367‐74. [MEDLINE: ] - PMC - PubMed
Wald 1984 {published data only}
    1. Wald A, Tunuguntla AK. Anorectal sensorimotor dysfunction in faecal incontinence in diabetes mellitus. New England Journal of Medicine 1984;310(20):1282‐7. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Wald 1987 {published data only}
    1. Wald A, Chandra R, Gabel S, Chiponis D. Evaluation of biofeedback in childhood encopresis. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 1987;6(4):554‐8. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Whitehead 1986 {published data only}
    1. Whitehead WE, Parker L, Bosmajian L, Morrill‐Corbin ED, Middaugh S, Garwood M, et al. Treatment of fecal incontinence in children with spina bifida: comparison of biofeedback and behavior modification. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1986;67:218‐24. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed

References to studies awaiting assessment

Marshall 1995 {published data only}
    1. Marshall K, Donnelly VS, O'Herlihy C, Walsh DM. Effectiveness of physiotherapy in the management of post‐partum faecal incontinence (Abstract number 195). Proceedings of the International Continence Society (ICS), 25th Annual Meeting, 1995 Oct 17‐20, Sydney, Australia 1995:193‐4.
Pages 2003 {published data only}
    1. Pages I‐H, Lemke J, Grundel K. Comparison of biofeedback and electrostimulation for treatment of fecal incontinence [German]. Physikalische Medizin Rehabilitationsmedizin Kurortmedizin 2003;13(6):325‐9.

References to ongoing studies

Dehli 2009 {published data only}
    1. Dehli T, Vonen B, Stordahl A, Jacobsen A, Lindsetmo RO, Mevik K. A randomized, controlled, clinical trial of biofeedback and anal injections as first treatment of fecal incontinence. ControlledTrials.com (www.controlled‐trials.com) [accessed 2 February 2009] 2009.
Stott 2000 {published data only}
    1. Stott S. A study to determine the effects of neuro‐stimulation on anal sphincter function when used in conjunction with biofeedback and pelvic floor exercises in the treatment of faecal incontinence. [personal communication] 2000.

Additional references

Boreham 2005
    1. Boreham MK, Richter HE, Kenton KS, Nager CW, Gregory WT, Aronson MP, et al. Anal incontinence in women presenting for gynecologic care: prevalence, risk factors, and impact upon quality of life. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005;192(5):1637‐42. - PubMed
Brown 2010
    1. Brown SR, Wadhawan H, Nelson RL. Surgery for faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 9. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001757.pub3] - DOI - PubMed
Cheetham 2002
    1. Cheetham MJ, Brazzelli M, Norton CC, Glazener CMA. Drug treatment for faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002116] - DOI - PubMed
Cotterill 2011
    1. Cotterill N, Norton C, Avery KN, Abrams P, Donovan JL. Psychometric evaluation of a new patient‐completed questionnaire for evaluating anal incontinence symptoms and impact on quality of life: the ICIQ‐B. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2011;54(10):1235‐50. - PubMed
Dumoulin 2010
    1. Dumoulin C, Hay‐Smith J. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005654.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Engel 1974
    1. Engel BT, Nikoomanesh P, Schuster MM. Operant conditioning of rectosphincteric responses in the treatment of faecal incontinence. New England Journal of Medicine 1974;290(12):646‐9. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Heymen 2001
    1. Heymen S, Jones KR, Ringel Y, Scarlett Y, Whitehead WE. Biofeedback treatment of fecal incontinence: a critical review. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2001;44(5):728‐36. - PubMed
Higgins 2011a
    1. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC (editors). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Higgins 2011b
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Hosker 2007
    1. Hosker G, Cody JD, Norton CC. Electrical stimulation for faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001310.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Johanson 1996
    1. Johanson JF, Lafferty J. Epidemiology of faecal incontinence: the silent affliction. American Journal of Gastroenterology 1996;91(1):33‐6. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Kegel 1948
    1. Kegel A. Progressive resistance exercise in the functional restoration of the perineal muscles. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1948;56:242‐5. - PubMed
Madoff 2009
    1. Madoff RD, Laurberg S, Matzel KE, Mellgren AF, Mimura T, O'Connell PR, et al. Surgery for faecal incontinence. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A editor(s). Incontinence: 4th International Consultation on Incontinence, Paris July 5‐8, 2008. Plymouth, UK: Health Publication Ltd, 2009:1387‐418.
Norton 2001
    1. Norton C, Kamm MA. Anal sphincter biofeedback and pelvic floor exercises for faecal incontinence in adults ‐ a systematic review. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2001;15:1147‐54. - PubMed
Norton 2004
    1. Norton C, Chelvanayagam S. Bowel Continence Nursing. Beaconsfield: Beaconsfield Publishers, 2004.
Norton 2009
    1. Norton C, Whitehead W, Bliss DZ, Harari D, Lang J. Conservative and pharmacological management of faecal incontinence in adults. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A editor(s). Incontinence: 4th International Consultation on Incontinence, Paris July 5‐8, 2008. Plymouth, UK: Health Publication Ltd, 2009:1321‐86.
Perry 2002
    1. Perry S, Shaw C, McGrother C, Flynn RJ, Assassa RP, Dallosso H, et al. The prevalence of faecal incontinence in adults aged 40 years or more living in the community. Gut 2002;50:480‐4. - PMC - PubMed
Potter 2002
    1. Potter J, Norton C, Cottenden A. Bowel care in older people. London: Royal College of Physicians, 2002.
Rao 2004
    1. Rao SS. Pathophysiology of adult fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 2004;126(1 Suppl 1):S14‐S22. - PubMed
Rockwood 1999
    1. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, et al. Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index. Disease of the Colon & Rectum 1999;42:1525‐32. - PubMed
Rockwood 2000
    1. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, et al. Fecal incontinence quality of life scale. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2000;43:9‐17. - PubMed
Thompson 1999
    1. Thompson WG, Longstreth GF, Drossman DA, Heaton KW, Irvine EJ, Muller‐Lissner SA. Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain. Gut 1999;45 Suppl 11:1143‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Tuteja 2004
    1. Tuteja AK, Rao SS. Review article: recent trends in diagnosis and treatment of faecal incontinence. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2004;19(8):829‐40. - PubMed
van Tets 1996
    1. Tets WF, Kuijpers JH, Bleijenberg G. Biofeedback treatment is ineffective in neurogenic fecal incontinence. Disease of the Colon & Rectum 1996;39(9):992‐4. - PubMed
Wade 1988
    1. Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability?. International Disability Studies 1988;10(2):64‐7. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Ware 1993
    1. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gaudek B. SF‐36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: New England Medical Centre, 1993.
Weinstein 1977
    1. Weinstein MC, Statson WB. Foundations of cost‐effectiveness analysis for health and medical practices. New England Journal of Medicine 1977;296(13):716‐21. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Whitehead 1981
    1. Whitehead WE, Orr WC, Engel BT, Schuster MM. External anal sphincter response to rectal distension: learned response or reflex. Psychophysiology 1981;19(1):57‐62. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Whitehead 2001
    1. Whitehead WE, Wald A, Norton N. Treatment options for fecal incontinence: consensus conference report. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2001;44:131‐44. - PubMed
Whitehead 2009
    1. Whitehead WE, Borrud L, Goode PS, Meikle S, Mueller ER, Tuteja A, et al. Fecal incontinence in US adults: epidemiology and risk factors. Gastroenterology 2009;137(2):512‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Wilson 2007
    1. Wilson M. The impact of faecal incontinence on the quality of life. British Journal of Nursing 2007;16(4):204‐7. - PubMed
Zigmond 1983
    1. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 1983;67(6):361‐70. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources