Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD008034.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008034.pub2.

Open Preperitoneal Techniques versus Lichtenstein Repair for elective Inguinal Hernias

Wouter Willaert  1 , Dirk De Bacquer, Xavier Rogiers, Roberto Troisi, Frederik Berrevoet
Affiliations

Open Preperitoneal Techniques versus Lichtenstein Repair for elective Inguinal Hernias

Wouter Willaert et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Current techniques for inguinal hernia repair show similar recurrence rates. Therefore, recurrence is no longer the main issue discussed when considering improving the current standards for groin hernia repair. Post surgical chronic pain represents a major, largely unrecognised clinical problem. Consequently, there is a need to not only decrease an extensive dissection in the inguinal canal with less manipulation of the inguinal nerves, but also to minimize the interaction between the mesh and major surrounding structures. As a result, placing the mesh in the preperitoneal space is a valuable option.

Objectives: To compare elective open preperitoneal mesh techniques with Lichtenstein mesh repair in terms of pain.

Search methods: We searched The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane library 2011, Issue 4), MEDLINE (January 1966 to April 2011), EMBASE (1947 to October 2009), and ISI WEB OF KNOWLEDGE (1900 to April 2011) for randomized controlled trials. The reference list of identified trials, the World Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, and relevant book chapters were handsearched for useful trials. If we found relevant ongoing trials using national and international trials registers, we contacted the main investigators for further information. The language of the trials was not an exclusion criterion.

Selection criteria: Randomized controlled studies comparing elective open preperitoneal mesh techniques with Lichtenstein mesh repair.

Data collection and analysis: Three authors independently extracted the pre-specified data and assessed the methodological quality using domain-based evaluation. Missing information was obtained by contacting the original investigators using open-ended questions.

Main results: Three eligible trials involving 569 patients were identified. Due to methodological limitations in the included studies, there was considerable variation in the results of acute (risk range 38.67% to 96.51%) and chronic pain (risk range 7.83% to 40.47%) across the control groups. Therefore, meta-analysis was not performed but the results of the outcomes in the individual trials were compared. Two trials involving 322 patients reported less chronic pain after preperitoneal repair (relative risk (RR) 0.18, number needed to treat (NNT) 8; RR 0.51, NNT 5), whereas one trial, including 247 patients, described more chronic pain after this repair (RR 1.17, NNT 77). The same trials favoured the preperitoneal technique concerning acute pain (RR 0.17, NNT 3; RR 0.78, NNT 7), whereas in the third trial it was almost omnipresent and thus comparable in both intervention arms (RR 0.997, NNT 333). Early and late hernia recurrence rates were similar across the studies, whereas contrasting results were reported for other early outcomes as infection and hematoma. No late mesh infection occurred in the included trials.

Authors' conclusions: Both techniques are valid as they result in similar low recurrence rates. Evaluation of pain results in the individual trials shows some evidence that preperitoneal repair causes less or comparable acute and chronic pain compared to the Lichtenstein procedure. We emphasize the need for homogeneous high quality randomized trials comparing elective preperitoneal inguinal hernia techniques and Lichtenstein repair in terms of chronic pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None known

Update of

  • doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008034

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

References to studies included in this review

Muldoon 2004 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Muldoon RL, Marchant K, Johnson DD, Yoder GG, Read RC, Hauer‐Jensen M. Lichtenstein vs anterior preperitoneal prosthetic mesh placement in open inguinal hernia repair: A prospective, randomized trial. Hernia 2004;8:98‐103. - PubMed
Nienhuijs 2007a {published and unpublished data}
    1. Nienhuijs S, Staal E, Keemers‐Gels M, Rosman C, Strobbe L. Pain after open preperitoneal repair versus Lichtenstein repair: a randomized trial. World Journal of Surgery 2007;31:1751‐57. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Dogru 2006 {published data only}
    1. Dogru O, Girgin M, Bulbuller N, Cetinkaya Z, Aygen E. Camci C. Comparison of Kugel and Lichtenstein operations for inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized study. World Journal of Surgery 2006;30:346‐50. - PubMed
Erhan 2008 {published data only}
    1. Erhan Y, Erhan E, Aydede H, Mercan M, Tok D. Chronic pain after Lichtenstein and preperitoneal (posterior) hernia repair. Canadian Journal of Surgery 2008;51:383‐87. - PMC - PubMed
Hamza 2010 {published data only}
    1. Hamza Y, Gabr E, Hammadi H, Khalil R. Four‐arm randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open hernia repairs. International Journal of Surgery 2010;8:25‐28. - PubMed
Kawji 1999 {published data only}
    1. Kawji R, Feichter A, Fuchsjäger N, Kux M. Postoperative pain and return to activity after five different types of inguinal herniorrhaphy. Hernia 1999;3:31‐35.
Mattioli 2002 {published data only}
    1. Mattioli F, Puglisi M, Priora F, Millo F, Bottaro P. Treatment of inguinal hernia: a prospective study comparing Bassini’s procedure, the inguinal preperitoneal prosthesis and the Lichtenstein technique [Trattamento dell’ernia inguinale. Studio prospettico: Bassini vs protesi peritoneale per via inguinale vs Lichtenstein]. Chirurgia Italiana 2002;54:317‐21. - PubMed
Vatansev 2002 {published data only}
    1. Vatansev C, Belviranli M, Aksoy F, Tuncer S, Sahin M, Karahan O. The effects of different hernia repair methods on postoperative pain medication and CRP levels. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques 2002;12:243‐46. - PubMed

References to ongoing studies

Koning {unpublished data only}
    1. Koning G. Lichtenstein technique versus transinguinal preperitoneal mesh prosthesis (TIPP): less chronic pain?.

Additional references

Arlt 2002
    1. Arlt G, Schumpelick V. The Shouldice repair for inguinal hernia‐technique and results. Aktuelle technik und ergebnisse [Die leistenhernienoperation nach Shouldice]. Zentralblatt für Chirurgie 2002;127(7):565‐69. - PubMed
Bassini 1887
    1. Bassini E. [Nuovo metodo sulla cura radicale dell'ernia inguinale]. Arch Soc Ital Chir 1887;4:380.
Butters 2007
    1. Butters M, Redecke J, Köninger J. Long‐term results of a randomized clinical trial of Shouldice, Lichtenstein and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repairs. Br J Surg 2007;94(5):562‐65. - PubMed
Bär 2009
    1. Bär A, Sauer T, Bohnert N, Goretzki PE, Lammers BJ. Less pain Intensity after Lichtenstein‐repair by using BioGlue for mesh fixation. Surgical Technology International 2009;18:125‐28. - PubMed
Deeks 2001
    1. Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ. Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta‐analysis. In: Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG editor(s). Systematic reviews in health care: meta‐analysis in context. 2nd Edition. London: BMJ Books, 2001:285‐312.
EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration 2002
    1. EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh: meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Annals of Surgery 2002;235(3):322‐32. - PMC - PubMed
Gainant 2000
    1. Gainant A, Geballa R, Bouvier S, Cubertafond P, Mathonnet M. Prosthetic treatment of bilateral inguinal hernias via laparoscopic approach or Stoppa procedure [Traitement prothétique des hernies inguinales bilatérales par voie laparoscopique ou par opération de StoppaBilateral inguinal hernia prosthetic repair: laparoscopic approach versus Stoppa’s technique]. Annales de Chirurgie 2000;125(6):560‐5. - PubMed
Grant 2002
    1. Grant AM. Open mesh versus non‐mesh repair of groin hernia: meta‐analysis of randomised trials based on individual patient data [corrected]. Hernia 2002;6(3):130‐36. - PubMed
Higgins 2003
    1. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta‐analyses. British Medical Journal 2003;327:557‐60. - PMC - PubMed
Kalliomäki 2009
    1. Kalliomäki ML, Sandblom G, Gunnarsson U, Gordh T. Persistent pain after groin hernia surgery: a qualitative analysis of pain and its consequences for quality of life. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2009;53(2):236‐46.. - PubMed
Kehlet 2006
    1. Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet 2006;367(9522):1618‐25. - PubMed
Kehlet 2008
    1. Kehlet H, Bay‐Nielsen M. Nationwide quality improvement of groin hernia repair from the Danish Hernia Database of 87,840 patients from 1998 to 2005. Hernia 2008;12(1):1‐7. - PubMed
Kugel 1999
    1. Kugel RD. Minimally invasive, nonlaparoscopic, preperitoneal, and sutureless, inguinal herniorrhaphy. American Journal of Surgery 1999;178(4):298‐302. - PubMed
Lichtenstein 1986
    1. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG. Ambulatory outpatient hernia surgery. Including a new concept, introducing tension‐free repair. International Surgery 1986;71(1):1‐4. - PubMed
Mathonnet 1997
    1. Mathonnet M, Cubertafond P, Gainant A. Bilateral inguinal hernias: giant prosthetic reinforcement of the visceral sac. Hernia 1997;1:93‐5.
McCormack 2003
    1. McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001785] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Merskey 1994
    1. Merskey H, Bogduk N. Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes, definitions of pain terms.. Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes, definitions of pain terms. Task Force on Taxonomy of the IASP. 2nd Edition. Seattle: International Association for the Study of Pain, 1994.
Nienhuijs 2007b
    1. Nienhuijs S, Staal E, Strobbe L, Rosman C, Groenewoud H, Bleichrodt R. Chronic pain after mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review.. Am J Surg 2007 Sep;194(3):394‐400. - PubMed
Nyhus 1960
    1. Nyhus LM, Condon RE, Harkins HN. Clinical experiences with the preperitoneal hernia repair for all types of hernia of the groin: with particular reference to the importance of transversalis fascia analogues. American Journal of Surgery 1960;100:234‐44. - PubMed
Nyhus 1993
    1. Nyhus LM. Iliopubic tract repair of inguinal and femoral hernia. The posterior (preperitoneal) approach. The Surgical Clinics of North America 1993;73(3):487‐99. - PubMed
Panos 1992
    1. Panos RG, Beck DE, Maresh JE, Harford FJ. Preliminary results of a prospective randomized study of Cooper's ligament versus Shouldice herniorrhaphy technique. Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics 1992;175(4):315‐19. - PubMed
Poobalan 2003
    1. Poobalan AS, Bruce J, Smith WC, King PM, Krukowski ZH, Chambers WA. A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy. The Clinical Journal of Pain 2003;19(1):48‐54. - PubMed
Primatesta 1996
    1. Primatesta P, Goldacre MJ. Inguinal hernia repair: incidence of elective and emergency surgery, readmission and mortality. International Journal of Epidemiology 1996 Aug;25(4):835‐39. - PubMed
Pélissier 2006
    1. Pelissier EP. Inguinal hernia: preperitoneal placement of a memory‐ring patch by anterior approach. Preliminary experience. Hernia 2006;10:248–252. - PubMed
Read 1993
    1. Read RC, Barone GW, Hauer‐Jensen M. Properitoneal prosthetic placement through the groin. Surg Clin North Am 1993;73:545–555. - PubMed
Rutkow 1993
    1. Rutkow IM, Robbins AW. "Tension‐free" inguinal herniorrhaphy: a preliminary report on the "mesh plug" technique. Surgery 1994;116(3):596. - PubMed
Rutkow 1995
    1. Rutkow IM, Robbins AW. Mesh plug hernia repair: a follow‐up report. Surgery 1995;117(5):597‐8. - PubMed
Rutkow 2003
    1. Rutkow IM. Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surgical Clinics of North America 2003;83(5):1045‐51. - PubMed
Rutledge 1988
    1. Rutledge RH. Cooper's ligament repair: a 25‐year experience with a single technique for all groin hernias in adults. Surgery 1988;103(1):1‐10. - PubMed
Schwartz 2005
    1. Brunicardi CF. Inguinal Hernias. In: Publisher Name: editor(s). Schwartz's PRINCIPLES OF SURGERY. 8th Edition. New York: McGraw‐Hill, 2005:1353‐94.
Scott 2001
    1. Scott NW, McCormack K, Graham P, Go PM, Ross SJ, Grant AM. Open mesh versus non‐mesh for groin hernia repair. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002197] - PubMed
Shouldice 2003
    1. Shouldice EB. The shouldice repair for groin hernias. The Surgical Clinics of North America 2003;83:1163‐187. - PubMed
Shulman 1992
    1. Shulman AG, Amid PK, Lichtenstein IL. The safety of mesh repair for primary inguinal hernias: results of 3,019 operations from five diverse surgical sources. The American Surgeon 1992;58:255‐57. - PubMed
Stoppa 1969
    1. Stoppa RE, Quintyn M. Deficiencies of the abdominal wall in aged persons [Les deficiencies de la paroi abdominale chez le suget age: colloque avec le praticien. Semin Hop]. L Semaine des Hôpitaux 1969 ;45:2182‐84. - PubMed
Ugahary 2001
    1. Ugahary F. The gridiron hernioplasty. In: Bendavid R, Abrahamson J, Arregui M, Flament JB, Phillips EH editor(s). Hernias of the Abdominal Wall: Principles and Management.. New York: Springer‐Verlag, 2001:p 407.
Wantz 1996
    1. Wantz GE. Experience with the tension‐free hernioplasty for primary inguinal hernias in men. J Am Coll Surg 1996;183:351‐56. - PubMed
Way 2005
    1. Way LW. Hernias & Other Lesions of the Abdominal Wall. In: Lawrence W Way editor(s). Current Surgical Diagnosis & Treatment. 11th Edition. New York: Mc Graw‐Hill, 2005.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources