Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD008926.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008926.pub2.

Toremifene versus tamoxifen for advanced breast cancer

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Toremifene versus tamoxifen for advanced breast cancer

Chen Mao et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Toremifene (TOR) and tamoxifen (TAM) can both be used as treatments for advanced breast cancer.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of TOR with TAM in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Search methods: The Cochrane Breast Cancer Group's Specialised Register was searched (1 July 2011) using the codes for "toremifene", "fareston", "tamoxifen, "nolvadex, and "breast cancer". We also searched MEDLINE (via PubMed) (from inception to 1 July 2011), EMBASE (via Ovid) (from inception to 1 July 2011), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 7, 2011), and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform search portal (1 July 2011). In addition, we screened the reference lists of relevant trials or reviews.

Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy and safety, or both of TOR with TAM in women with advanced breast cancer. Trials that provided sufficient data on one of the following items: objective response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and adverse events, were considered eligible for inclusion.

Data collection and analysis: Studies were assessed for eligibility and quality. Two review authors independently extracted the following details: first author, publication year, country, years of follow-up, treatment arms, intention-to-treat (ITT) population size, menopausal status of patients, hormone receptor status, response criteria, efficacy and safety outcomes of TOR and TAM arms. Hazard ratios (HR) were derived for time-to-event outcomes, where possible, and response and adverse events were analysed as dichotomous variables. We used a fixed-effect model for meta-analysis unless there was significant between-study heterogeneity.

Main results: A total of 2061 patients from seven RCTs were included for final analysis, with 1226 patients in the TOR group and 835 patients in the TAM group. The ORR for the TOR group was 25.8% (316/1226) whereas, the ORR for the TAM group was 26.9% (225/835). The pooled risk ratio (RR) suggested that the ORRs were not statistically different between the two groups (RR 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 1.18, P = 0.83). The median TTP was 6.1 months for the TOR group and 5.8 months for the TAM group. The median OS was 27.8 months for the TOR group and 27.6 months for the TAM group. There were no significant differences in TTP and OS between the two therapeutic groups (for TTP: HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.24; for OS: HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.20). The frequencies of most adverse events were also similar in the two groups, while headache seemed to occur less in the TOR group than in the TAM group (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.74, P = 0.02). There was no significant heterogeneity between studies in most of the above meta-analyses. Sensitivity analysis did not alter the results.

Authors' conclusions: TOR and TAM are equally effective and the safety profile of the former is at least not worse than the latter in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer. Thus, TOR may serve as a reasonable alternative to TAM when anti-oestrogens are applicable but TAM is not the preferred choice for some reason.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None to declare.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram
2
2
'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
3
3
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Toremifene (TOR) vs tamoxifen (TAM), outcome: 1.5 Objective response.
4
4
Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Toremifene (TOR) vs tamoxifen (TAM), outcome: 1.5 Objective response.
5
5
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Toremifene (TOR) vs tamoxifen (TAM), outcome: 1.6 Time to progression.
6
6
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Toremifene (TOR) vs tamoxifen (TAM), outcome: 1.7 Overall survival.
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1: Toremifene (TOR) vs tamoxifen (TAM), Outcome 1: Complete response
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1: Toremifene (TOR) vs tamoxifen (TAM), Outcome 2: Partial response
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1: Toremifene (TOR) vs tamoxifen (TAM), Outcome 3: Stable disease
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1: Toremifene (TOR) vs tamoxifen (TAM), Outcome 4: Progressive disease
1.5
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1: Toremifene (TOR) vs tamoxifen (TAM), Outcome 5: Objective response
1.6
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1: Toremifene (TOR) vs tamoxifen (TAM), Outcome 6: Time to progression
1.7
1.7. Analysis
Comparison 1: Toremifene (TOR) vs tamoxifen (TAM), Outcome 7: Overall survival
1.8
1.8. Analysis
Comparison 1: Toremifene (TOR) vs tamoxifen (TAM), Outcome 8: Nausea
1.9
1.9. Analysis
Comparison 1: Toremifene (TOR) vs tamoxifen (TAM), Outcome 9: Voice changes
1.10
1.10. Analysis
Comparison 1: Toremifene (TOR) vs tamoxifen (TAM), Outcome 10: Vaginal discharge
1.11
1.11. Analysis
Comparison 1: Toremifene (TOR) vs tamoxifen (TAM), Outcome 11: Vaginal bleeding
1.12
1.12. Analysis
Comparison 1: Toremifene (TOR) vs tamoxifen (TAM), Outcome 12: Hot flushes
1.13
1.13. Analysis
Comparison 1: Toremifene (TOR) vs tamoxifen (TAM), Outcome 13: Vomiting
1.14
1.14. Analysis
Comparison 1: Toremifene (TOR) vs tamoxifen (TAM), Outcome 14: Headache
1.15
1.15. Analysis
Comparison 1: Toremifene (TOR) vs tamoxifen (TAM), Outcome 15: Thromboembolic events
1.16
1.16. Analysis
Comparison 1: Toremifene (TOR) vs tamoxifen (TAM), Outcome 16: Cardiac events
1.17
1.17. Analysis
Comparison 1: Toremifene (TOR) vs tamoxifen (TAM), Outcome 17: Vaginal dryness
1.18
1.18. Analysis
Comparison 1: Toremifene (TOR) vs tamoxifen (TAM), Outcome 18: Ocular disorders
1.19
1.19. Analysis
Comparison 1: Toremifene (TOR) vs tamoxifen (TAM), Outcome 19: Endometrial cancer
1.20
1.20. Analysis
Comparison 1: Toremifene (TOR) vs tamoxifen (TAM), Outcome 20: Sweating

Update of

  • doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008926

Similar articles

Cited by

References

References to studies included in this review

Gershanovich 1997 {published data only}
    1. Gershanovich M, Garin A, Baltina D, Kurvet A, Kangas L, Ellmen J, and Eastern European Study Group. A phase III comparison of two toremifene doses to tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1997;45:251-62. - PubMed
Hayes 1995 {published data only}
    1. Hayes DF, Van Zyl JA, Hacking A, Goedhals L, Bezwoda WR, Mailliard JA et al. Randomized comparison of tamoxifen and two separate doses of toremifene in postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1995;13:2556-66. - PubMed
Kaufmann 1993 {published data only}
    1. Pyrhonen S, Ellmen J, Vuorinen J, Gershanovich M, Tominaga T, Kaufmann M et al. Meta-analysis of trials comparing toremifene with tamoxifen and factors predicting outcome of antiestrogen therapy in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1999;56:133-43. - PubMed
Milla‐Santos 2001 {published data only}
    1. Milla-Santos A, Milla L, Rallo L, Solano V. Phase III randomized trial of toremifene vs tamoxifen in hormonodependant advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2001;65:119-24. - PubMed
Nomura 1993 {published data only}
    1. Nomura Y, Tominaga T, Abe O, Izuo M, Ogawa N. Clinical evaluation of NK 622 (toremifene citrate) in advanced or recurrent breast cancer--a comparative study by a double blind method with tamoxifen. Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy (Gan to Kagaku Ryoho) 1993;20:247-58. - PubMed
Pyrhonen 1997 {published data only}
    1. Pyrhonen S, Valavaara R, Modig H, Pawlicki M, Pienkowski T, Gundersen S et al. Comparison of toremifene and tamoxifen in post-menopausal patients with advanced breast cancer: a randomized double-blind, the 'nordic' phase III study. British Joumal of Cancer 1997;76:270-7. - PMC - PubMed
Stenbygaard 1993 {published data only}
    1. Stenbygaard LE, Herrstedt J, Thomsen JF, Svendsen KR, Engelholm SA, Dombernowsky P. Toremifene and tamoxifen in advanced breast cancer--a double-blind cross-over trial. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1993;25:57-63. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Bonneterre 1996 {published data only}
    1. Bonneterre J. Comparative phase III studies of toremifene and tamoxifen in advanced breast cancer. Bulletin de la Société Française de Cancérologie Privée 1996;15:45-6.
Ellmen 2003 {published data only}
    1. Ellmen J, Hakulinen P, Partanen A, Hayes DF. Estrogenic effects of toremifene and tamoxifen in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2003;82:103-11. - PubMed
Garin 1989 {published data only}
    1. Garin AM, Perevodchikova ML, Gershanovich M, Baltina D, Zharkov SA, Trofimova NB et al. A comparative study of toremifene for two dose levels and tamoxifen in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Proceedings of the 12th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 1988 Dec 7-9. In: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. Vol. 14. 1989:137.
Gershanovich 1997b {published data only}
    1. Gershanovich M, Hayes DF, Ellmen J, Vuorinen J. High-dose toremifene vs tamoxifen in postmenopausal advanced breast cancer. Oncology (Williston Park) 1997;11 Suppl 4:S29-36. - PubMed
Gershanovich 1997c {published data only}
    1. Gershanovich ML, Garin AM, Baltinia D, Kurvet A, Kangas L, Ellmen Iu. Results of phase II clinical trial of tamoxifen and toremifen in two different doses in advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Voprosy Onkologii 1997;43:587-95. - PubMed
Gianni 2006 {published data only}
    1. Gianni L, Panzini I, Li S, Gelber RD, Collins J, Holmberg SB et al. Ocular toxicity during adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for early breast cancer: results from International Breast Cancer Study Group trials. Cancer 2006;106:505-13. - PubMed
Gianni 2009 {published data only}
    1. Gianni L, Gelber S, Ravaioli A, Price KN, Panzini I, Fantini M et al. Second non-breast primary cancer following adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer: a report from the International Breast Cancer Study Group. European Journal of Cancer 2009;45:561-71. - PMC - PubMed
Herrstedt 1989 {published data only}
    1. Herrstedt J, Stenbygaard LE, Thomsen JF, Svendsen KR, Engelholm SA, Dombernowsky P. Double blind crossover study of toremifene versus tamoxifen in advanced breast cancer. Proceedings of the 12th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 1988 Dec 7-9. In: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. Vol. 14. 1989:137.
Holli 1998a {published data only}
    1. Holli K, Joensuu H, Valavaara R, Blanco G, Kataja V, Pukkala E. Interim results of the Finnish toremifene vs tamoxifen adjuvant trial. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1998;50:283.
Holli 1998b {published data only}
    1. Holli K. Adjuvant trials of toremifene vs tamoxifen: the European experience. Oncology 1998;12 Suppl 4:S23-7. - PubMed
Holli 2000a {published data only}
    1. Holli K. Toxicity and early survival results of a prospective, randomized adjuvant trial comparing toremifene and tamoxifen in node-positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Vol. 19. 2000:87a, Abstract 334.
Holli 2000b {published data only}
    1. Holli K, Valavaara R, Blanco G, Kataja V, Hietanen P, Flander M et al for the Finnish Breast Cancer Group. Safety and efficacy results of a randomized trial comparing adjuvant toremifene and tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2000;20:3487-94. - PubMed
Holli 2002 {published data only}
    1. Holli K. Tamoxifen versus toremifene in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. European Journal of Cancer 2002;38 Suppl 6:S37-8. - PubMed
Konstantinova 1990 {published data only}
    1. Konstantinova MM, Gershanovich MA. The results of a comparative clinical study of the antiestrogenic preparations toremifene and tamoxifen in locally advanced and disseminated breast cancer. Voprosy Onkologii 1990;36:1182-6. - PubMed
Lewis 2010 {published data only}
    1. Lewis JD, Chagpar AB, Shaughnessy EA, Nurko J, McMasters K, Edwards MJ. Excellent outcomes with adjuvant toremifene or tamoxifen in early stage breast cancer. Cancer 2010;116:2307-15. - PubMed
Pagani 2003 {published data only}
    1. Pagani O, Gelber S, Simoncini E, Holmberg SB, Colleoni M, Crivellari D et al. In: Proceedings of American Society of Clinical Oncology. Vol. 22. 2003:20, Abstract 79.
Pagani 2004 {published data only}
    1. Pagani O, Gelber S, Price K, Zahrieh D, Gelber R, Simoncini E et al. Toremifene and tamoxifen are equally effective for early-stage breast cancer: first results of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials 12-93 and 14-93. Annals of Oncology 2004;15:1749-59. - PubMed
Pyrhonen 1990 {published data only}
    1. Pyrhonen SO. Phase III studies of toremifene in metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1990;16 Suppl:S41-6. - PubMed
Simoncini 1996 {published data only}
    1. Simoncini E. Phase III randomised study of adjuvant endocrine therapy (tamoxifen vs toremifene) with vs without anthracycline/cyclophosphamide (AC) in peri- and postmenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer, with chemotherapy started either concurrently with or prior to endocrine therapy. Physician Data Query (PDQ). In: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/o/cochrane/clcentral/articles/492/CN-0030....
Stenbygaard 1990 {published data only}
    1. Stenbygaard LE, Herrstedt J, Thomsen JF, Svendsen K, Engelholm SA, Dombernowsky P. Clinical cross resistance in patients with advanced breast cancer. A double-blind cross-over study of toremifene (Tor) and tamoxifen (tam). Annals of Oncology 1990;1 Suppl:17.

Additional references

Ahotupa 1994
    1. Ahotupa M, Hirsimaki P, Parssinen R, Mantyla E. Alterations of drug metabolizing and antioxidant enzyme activities during tamoxifen-induced hepatocarcinogenesis in the rat. Carcinogenesis 1994;15(5):863-8. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Anderson 2008
    1. Anderson BO, Yip CH, Smith RA, Shyyan R, Sener SF, Eniu A et al. Guideline implementation for breast healthcare in low-income and middle-income countries: overview of the Breast Health Global Initiative Global Summit 2007. Cancer 2008;113 Suppl(8):2221-43. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Asaishi 1993
    1. Asaishi K, Tominaga T, Abe O, Izuo M, Nomura Y. Efficacy and safety of high dose NK 622 (toremifene citrate) in tamoxifen failed patients with breast cancer. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 1993;20(1):91-9. - PubMed
Chatterjee 1990
    1. Chatterjee M, Harris AL. Enhancement of adriamycin cytotoxicity in a multidrug resistant Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) subline, CHO-Adrr, by toremifene and its modulation by alpha 1 acid glycoprotein. European Journal of Cancer 1990;26(4):432-6. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Clemons 2002
    1. Clemons M, Danson S, Howell A. Tamoxifen ("Nolvadex"): a review. Cancer Treatment Reviews 2002;28(4):165-80. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Cochran 1954
    1. Cochran WG. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 1954;10(1):101-29. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Cox 2006
    1. Cox MC, Dan TD, Swain SM. Emerging drugs to replace current leaders in first-line therapy for breast cancer. Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs 2006;11(3):489-501. [PMID: 16939387 ] - PubMed
Cuzick 2007
    1. Cuzick J, Forbes JF, Sestak I, Cawthorn S, Hamed H, Holli K, et al. Long-term results of tamoxifen prophylaxis for breast cancer--96-month follow-up of the randomized IBIS-I trial. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2007;99(4):272-82. - PubMed
DeGregorio 1989
    1. DeGregorio MW, Ford JM, Benz CC, Wiebe VJ. Toremifene: pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic basis of reversing multidrug resistance. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1989;7(9):1359-64. [PMID: ] - PubMed
DerSimonian 1986
    1. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1986;7(3):177-88. [PMID: ] - PubMed
di Salle 1990
    1. di Salle E, Zaccheo T, Ornati G. Antiestrogenic and antitumor properties of the new triphenylethylene derivative toremifene in the rat. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry 1990;36(3):203-6. [PMID: ] - PubMed
EBCTCG 1992
    1. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Systemic treatment of early breast cancer by hormonal, cytotoxic, or immune therapy. 133 randomised trials involving 31,000 recurrences and 24,000 deaths among 75,000 women. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Lancet 1992;339(8785):71-85. [PMID: ] - PubMed
EBCTCG 1998
    1. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 1998;351(9114):1451-67. [PMID: ] - PubMed
EBCTCG 2005
    1. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 2005;365(9472):1687-717. [PMID: ] - PubMed
EBCTCG 2011
    1. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG), Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R, Clarke M, Cutter D et al. Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 2011;378(9793):771-84. - PMC - PubMed
Egger 1997
    1. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315(7109):629-34. [PMID: ] - PMC - PubMed
Fisher 1998
    1. Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, Redmond CK, Kavanah M, Cronin WM et al. Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1998;90(18):1371-88. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Gradishar 2010
    1. Gradishar WJ. Adjuvant endocrine therapy for early breast cancer: the story so far. Cancer Investigation 2010;28(4):433-42. - PubMed
Higgins 2003
    1. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327(7414):557-60. [PMID: ] - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2008
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1 [updated September 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
Hirsimaki 2002
    1. Hirsimaki P, Aaltonen A, Mantyla E. Toxicity of antiestrogens. The Breast Journal 2002;8(2):92-6. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Jaiyesimi 1995
    1. Jaiyesimi IA, Buzdar AU, Decker DA, Hortobagyi GN. Use of tamoxifen for breast cancer: twenty-eight years later. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1995;13(2):513-29. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Jemal 2008
    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2008;58(2):71-96. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Jönsson 1991
    1. Jönsson PE, Malmberg M, Bergljung L, Ingvar C, Ericsson M, Ryden S et al. Phase II study of high dose toremifene in advanced breast cancer progressing during tamoxifene treatment. Anticancer Research 1991;11:873-5. - PubMed
Jordan 1978
    1. Jordan VC, Dix CJ, Naylor KE, Prestwich G, Rowsby L. Nonsteroidal antiestrogens: their biological effects and potential mechanisms of action. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health 1978;4(2-3):363-90. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Kangas 1986
    1. Kangas L, Nieminen AL, Blanco G, Gronroos M, Kallio S, Karjalainen A et al. A new triphenylethylene compound, Fc-1157a. II. Antitumor effects. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 1986;17(2):109-13. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Kangas 1992
    1. Kangas L. Agonistic and antagonistic effects of antiestrogens in different target organs. Acta Oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) 1992;31(2):143-6. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Lahti 1994
    1. Lahti EI, Knip M, Laatikainen TJ. Plasma insulin-like growth factor I and its binding proteins 1 and 3 in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer receiving long term tamoxifen. Cancer 1994;74(2):618-24. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Lange 2011
    1. Lange CA, Yee D. Killing the second messenger: targeting loss of cell cycle control in endocrine-resistant breast cancer. Endocrine-Related Cancer 2011;18(4):C19-C24. - PMC - PubMed
Mantel 1959
    1. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1959;22(4):719-48. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Osborne 1998
    1. Osborne CK. Tamoxifen in the treatment of breast cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine 1998;339(22):1609-18. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Parkin 2002
    1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2005;55(2):74-108. [PMID: 15761078 ] - PubMed
Powles 1989
    1. Powles TJ, Hardy JR, Ashley SE, Farrington GM, Cosgrove D, Davey JB et al. A pilot trial to evaluate the acute toxicity and feasibility of tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer 1989;60(1):126-31. [PMID: ] - PMC - PubMed
Pyrhönen 1994
    1. Pyrhönen S, Valavaara R, Vuorinen J, Hajba A. High dose toremifene in advanced breast cancer resistant to or relapsed during tamoxifen treatment. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1994;29:223-8. - PubMed
Pyrhonen 1999
    1. Pyrhonen S, Ellmen J, Vuorinen J, Gershanovich M, Tominaga T, Kaufmann M et al. Meta-analysis of trials comparing toremifene with tamoxifen and factors predicting outcome of antiestrogen therapy in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1999;56(2):133-43. - PubMed
Ramkumar 1995
    1. Ramkumar T, Adler S. Differential positive and negative transcriptional regulation by tamoxifen. Endocrinology 1995;136(2):536-42. [PMID: ] - PubMed
RevMan [Computer program]
    1. The Nordic Cochane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.1. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
Su 1985
    1. Su HD, Mazzei GJ, Vogler WR, Kuo JF. Effect of tamoxifen, a nonsteroidal antiestrogen, on phospholipid/calcium-dependent protein kinase and phosphorylation of its endogenous substrate proteins from the rat brain and ovary. Biochemical Pharmacology 1985;34(20):3649-53. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Thangaraju 1995
    1. Thangaraju M, Ezhilarasi R, Sachdanandam P. Effect of tamoxifen on erythrocyte membrane lipids, lipid peroxides, and antioxidative enzymes in breast cancer women. Cancer Biochemistry Biophysics 1995;14(4):297-302. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Tobias 1999
    1. Tobias A. Assessing the influences of a single study in the meta-analysis estimate. Stata Technical Bulletin 1999;8(17):15-7.
Valverde 1993
    1. Valverde MA, Mintenig GM, Sepulveda FV. Differential effects of tamoxifen and I- on three distinguishable chloride currents activated in T84 intestinal cells. Pflugers Archiv: European Journal of Physiology 1993;425(5-6):552-4. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Vogel 1993
    1. Vogel CL, Shemano I, Schoenfelder J, Gams RA, Green MR. Multicenter phase II efficacy trial of toremifene in tamoxifen-refractory patients with advanced breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1993;11:345-50. - PubMed
Warri 1993
    1. Warri AM, Huovinen RL, Laine AM, Martikainen PM, Harkonen PL. Apoptosis in toremifene-induced growth inhibition of human breast cancer cells in vivo and in vitro. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1993;85(17):1412-8. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Wiseman 1994
    1. Wiseman H. Tamoxifen: new membrane-mediated mechanisms of action and therapeutic advances. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 1994;15(3):83-9. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Zhou 2011
    1. Zhou WB, Ding Q, Chen L, Liu XA, Wang S. Toremifene is an effective and safe alternative to tamoxifen in adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer: results of four randomized trials. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2011;128(3):625-31. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms