Shock - A reappraisal: The holistic approach
- PMID: 22787348
- PMCID: PMC3391842
- DOI: 10.4103/0974-2700.96487
Shock - A reappraisal: The holistic approach
Abstract
Shock as reaction to life-threatening condition needs to be reclassified in a timely and more scientific synopsis. It is not possible or beneficial any longer to avoid a holistic approach in critical illness. Semantics of critical illness has often been unfriendly in the literature and a simplification with the elimination of conceptual pleonasms and misnomers under the exclusive light of physiology and physiopathology would be advantageous. Speaking one language to describe the same phenomenon worldwide is essential for understanding; moreover, it increases focus on characterization and significance of the phenomena.
Keywords: Multiple organs dysfunction; multiple organs failure; shock.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures




References
-
- Rutherford RB, Balis JV, Trows RS, Graves GM. Comparison of hemodynamic and regional blood flow at equivalent stages of endotoxin and hemorrhagic shock. J Trauma. 1976;16:886–97. - PubMed
-
- McMillen MA, Huribal M, Sumpio B. Common pathway of endothelial-leukocyte interaction in shock, ischemia, and reperfusion. Am J Surg. 1993;166:557–62. - PubMed
-
- Ullian ME. The role of corticosteroids in the regulation of vascular tone. Cardiovasc Res. 1999;41:55–64. - PubMed
-
- Bonanno F. Extending damage control philosophy to non-haemorrhagic situations: Implications for a reclassification of shock states. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78:634–7. - PubMed