Short-term results of endoscopic (Okutsu method) versus palmar incision open carpal tunnel release: a prospective randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 22790892
- DOI: 10.5387/fms.58.49
Short-term results of endoscopic (Okutsu method) versus palmar incision open carpal tunnel release: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Purpose: The surgical techniques widely used in Japan for idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) are the Okutsu method of endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) and palmar incision for open carpal tunnel release (OCTR). However, no prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared treatment outcomes between these two procedures. This RCT compared short-term outcomes between ECTR and OCTR for CTS.
Materials and methods: Subjects were 101 hands (79 patients) treated in the department. ECTR was performed on 51 hands (40 patients), and OCTR was performed on 50 hands (39 patients). For assessment items, the following patient-based outcomes were evaluated: 1) changes in subjective symptoms; and 2) impairment in activities of daily living. The following items were also evaluated by physicians: 3) abductor pollicis brevis-distal latency (APB-DL); 4) sensation; and 5) muscle strength. All these assessments were made in postoperative weeks 4 and 12.
Results: Recovery of muscle strength at postoperative week 4 was significantly better with ECTR (p< 0.05), but no significant differences were identified between groups in any of the other items. The ECTR group showed transient postoperative exacerbation of subjective symptoms in two hands (4%) and of APB-DL in three hands (6%). Comparison of hands with improved and exacerbated postoperative APB-DL in the ECTR group revealed significantly greater preoperative electrophysiological severity in exacerbated hands (p< 0.05). The cause of postoperative exacerbation with ECTR was considered to be transient nerve dysfunction resulting from the unique aspects of the ECTR procedure.
Conclusions: Compared with OCTR, ECTR offers superior recovery of muscle strength in the early postoperative period. At the same time, ECTR may carry a risk of transient nerve dysfunction in the early postoperative period. Caution must therefore be exercised when using ECTR for patients with severe electrophysiological findings.
Similar articles
-
Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release for idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Jan 28;10:12. doi: 10.1186/s13018-014-0148-6. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015. PMID: 25627324 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of release surgery for idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: endoscopic versus open method.Acta Med Okayama. 1999 Aug;53(4):179-83. doi: 10.18926/AMO/31614. Acta Med Okayama. 1999. PMID: 10488404
-
Prospective, randomized evaluation of endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release in bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: an interim analysis.Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Dec;73 Suppl 2:S157-60. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000203. Ann Plast Surg. 2014. PMID: 25046667 Clinical Trial.
-
Open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Apr 27;21(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03306-1. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020. PMID: 32340621 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release: A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Complications.Cureus. 2024 Jul 20;16(7):e64991. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64991. eCollection 2024 Jul. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39165434 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release for idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Jan 28;10:12. doi: 10.1186/s13018-014-0148-6. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015. PMID: 25627324 Free PMC article.
-
Rates of Complications and Secondary Surgeries of Mini-Open Carpal Tunnel Release.Hand (N Y). 2019 Jul;14(4):471-476. doi: 10.1177/1558944718765226. Epub 2018 Mar 20. Hand (N Y). 2019. PMID: 29557679 Free PMC article.
-
Time to recovery following open and endoscopic carpal tunnel decompression: meta-analysis.BJS Open. 2025 Jul 1;9(4):zraf085. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf085. BJS Open. 2025. PMID: 40699057 Free PMC article.
-
Similar effectiveness of the open versus endoscopic technique for carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized trial.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Dec;25(8):1253-60. doi: 10.1007/s00590-015-1696-0. Epub 2015 Aug 30. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015. PMID: 26319124 Clinical Trial.
-
Open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Mar;473(3):1120-32. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3835-z. Epub 2014 Aug 19. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015. PMID: 25135849 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials