Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;7(7):e40253.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040253. Epub 2012 Jul 5.

Tweeting the meeting: an in-depth analysis of Twitter activity at Kidney Week 2011

Tejas Desai  1 , Afreen Shariff, Aabid Shariff, Mark Kats, Xiangming Fang, Cynthia Christiano, Maria Ferris
Affiliations

Tweeting the meeting: an in-depth analysis of Twitter activity at Kidney Week 2011

Tejas Desai et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

In recent years, the American Society of Nephrology (ASN) has increased its efforts to use its annual conference to inform and educate the public about kidney disease. Social media, including Twitter, has been one method used by the Society to accomplish this goal. Twitter is a popular microblogging service that serves as a potent tool for disseminating information. It allows for short messages (140 characters) to be composed by any author and distributes those messages globally and quickly. The dissemination of information is necessary if Twitter is to be considered a tool that can increase public awareness of kidney disease. We hypothesized that content, citation, and sentiment analyses of tweets generated from Kidney Week 2011 would reveal a large number of educational tweets that were disseminated to the public. An ideal tweet for accomplishing this goal would include three key features: 1) informative content, 2) internal citations, and 3) positive sentiment score. Informative content was found in 29% of messages, greater than that found in a similarly sized medical conference (2011 ADA Conference, 16%). Informative tweets were more likely to be internally, rather than externally, cited (38% versus 22%, p<0.0001), thereby amplifying the original information to an even larger audience. Informative tweets had more negative sentiment scores than uninformative tweets (means -0.162 versus 0.199 respectively, p<0.0001), therefore amplifying a tweet whose content had a negative tone. Our investigation highlights significant areas of promise and improvement in using Twitter to disseminate medical information in nephrology from a scientific conference. This goal is pertinent to many nephrology-focused conferences that wish to increase public awareness of kidney disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Tweets from Kidney Week 2011.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Relationship between numbers of tweets and tweeters.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Distribution of tweet content.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Distribution of tweet citations.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Relationships between numbers of tweets and citations.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Distribution of sentiment scores.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Chartier K. The 10 Major Challenges Facing Nephrology. Renal Business Today. 2011. pp. 4–9.
    1. Seven things you should know about Twitter. Educause Learning Initiative. 2007. Available: http://www.educause/edu/eli. Accessed 2011 Aug 19.
    1. Weller K, Puschmann P. Twitter for Scientific Communication: How Can Citations/References be Identified and Measured? 2011. Proceedings of the Web Science Conference Available: http://www.websci11.org/fileadmin/websci/posters/153_paper.pdf. Accessed 2011 Aug 19.
    1. Ebner M, Reinhardt W. Social networking in scientific conferences – Twitter as a tool for strengthen a scientific community. European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning 2009 Conference. 2009. Available: http://www.telearn.org/warehouse/Ebner_2009_TelSci2.0_%28002197v1%29.pdf. Accessed 2011 Aug 19.
    1. Letierce J, Passant A, Decker S, Breslin JG. Understanding how Twitter is used to spread scientific messages. Proceedings of the Web Science Conference 2010. 2010. Available: http://journal.webscience.org/314/2/websci10_submission_79.pdf. Accessed 2011 Aug 19.