Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012:2012:182767.
doi: 10.1155/2012/182767. Epub 2012 Jun 25.

Development of brainstem-evoked responses in congenital auditory deprivation

Affiliations

Development of brainstem-evoked responses in congenital auditory deprivation

J Tillein et al. Neural Plast. 2012.

Erratum in

  • Neural Plast. 2012;2012:168297

Abstract

To compare the development of the auditory system in hearing and completely acoustically deprived animals, naive congenitally deaf white cats (CDCs) and hearing controls (HCs) were investigated at different developmental stages from birth till adulthood. The CDCs had no hearing experience before the acute experiment. In both groups of animals, responses to cochlear implant stimulation were acutely assessed. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (E-ABRs) were recorded with monopolar stimulation at different current levels. CDCs demonstrated extensive development of E-ABRs, from first signs of responses at postnatal (p.n.) day 3 through appearance of all waves of brainstem response at day 8 p.n. to mature responses around day 90 p.n.. Wave I of E-ABRs could not be distinguished from the artifact in majority of CDCs, whereas in HCs, it was clearly separated from the stimulus artifact. Waves II, III, and IV demonstrated higher thresholds in CDCs, whereas this difference was not found for wave V. Amplitudes of wave III were significantly higher in HCs, whereas wave V amplitudes were significantly higher in CDCs. No differences in latencies were observed between the animal groups. These data demonstrate significant postnatal subcortical development in absence of hearing, and also divergent effects of deafness on early waves II-IV and wave V of the E-ABR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Examples of E-ABRs recorded from an adult hearing control (a) and an adult CDC (b). Arrows point to E-ABR components at threshold intensity. Current levels are given in dB attenuation (re 3 mApp). In general, similar morphology was observed, with some less-well differentiated waves in CDCs. Stimulus artifact (starting at 0 ms) was removed.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Photographs of the bulla in animals of the youngest group, compared to an adult animal. At postnatal days 0 and 3 (top), the bulla was filled with milky viscous tissue that covered the round window (its rims show through, marked by arrows). At postnatal day 8 (middle), the tissue was more translucent. In all older animals investigated, the bulla was fully pneumatized and did not show any further developmental changes (bottom).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Development of E-ABRs in the first 52 days postnatally. All animals are from the white cat colony, but only after hearing onset (after day 10 p.n.) CDCs can be differentiated from white cats with residual hearing. Stimulus: biphasic pulse, 200 μs/phase at 10 dB above threshold. Stimulus duration is shown as a black bar, the artifact is removed form the recordings. At day 3 p.n., even at this high stimulation intensity the amplitudes of the waves were very small and only two waves could be differentiated from noise (marked by arrows). At day 8 p.n., all waves were observed (at the high intensity shown, waves III–V fused into a single large wave marked by the asterisk).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Development of wave latencies in hearing controls and CDCs, shown are peak latencies from all animals. Not in every animal all waves could be identified. The animal recorded at day 8 p.n. (before hearing onset) was considered a common starting point for the development in both groups. Systematic differences between animal groups were not observed, only in wave V had a tendency toward shorter latencies in CDCs.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparisons of wave thresholds in matured animals (older than 3 months). Significantly larger thresholds were observed in CDCs for waves II, III, and IV. The trend in wave V is in opposite direction (two-tailed t-test at α = 5%).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Wave mean peak amplitudes in matured animals (older than 3 months). In CDCs, wave III had lower and wave V higher amplitude (two-tailed t-test at α = 5%).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Mean peak latencies of all waves in matured animals (older than 3 months). No statistically significant differences were observed between CDCs and hearing controls.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kral A. Unimodal and cross-modal plasticity in the “deaf” auditory cortex. International Journal of Audiology. 2007;46(9):479–493. - PubMed
    1. Kapfer C, Seidl AH, Schweizer H, Grothe B. Experience-dependent refinement of inhibitory inputs to auditory coincidence-detector neurons. Nature Neuroscience. 2002;5(3):247–253. - PubMed
    1. Brand A, Behrend O, Marquardt T, McAlpine T, Grothe B. Precise inhibition is essential for microsecond interaural time difference coding. Nature. 2002;417(6888):543–547. - PubMed
    1. Mair IWS. Hereditary deafness in the white cat. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. Supplementum. 1973;314:1–48. - PubMed
    1. Heid S, Hartmann R, Klinke R. A model for prelingual deafness, the congenitally deaf white cat—population statistics and degenerative changes. Hearing Research. 1998;115(1-2):101–112. - PubMed

Publication types