Two-stage palatoplasty, is it still a valuable treatment protocol for patients with a cleft of lip, alveolus, and palate?
- PMID: 22795166
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.05.013
Two-stage palatoplasty, is it still a valuable treatment protocol for patients with a cleft of lip, alveolus, and palate?
Abstract
Introduction: Speech development is of utmost importance and requires early closure of a palatal cleft. On the other hand, it is well known that all types and timings of surgical repair of facial clefts are detrimental to maxillary growth. Nevertheless, these days one is more and more confronted with a world-wide tendency in favour of the one-in-all operation to close clefts of the lip, alveolus, and palate. Therefore, a three-centre study was performed for testing - once more - the value of two-stage palatoplasty as a means to reduce the detrimental effects of surgery on palatal growth and at the same time to also enable early speech development.
Material and methods: Plaster casts from 85 patients have been re-evaluated. All of them had a complete unilateral cleft of lip, alveolus, and palate. They had been treated according to the old therapy protocols followed in either one of the three different cleft centres many years ago, namely in Hamburg, (Western) Germany, Iowa City, IO, USA, and Rostock, (in those days still Eastern) Germany. The impressions had been taken already in 1987 from patients being either 8 years (36 pts.) or 16 years of age (49 pts.). Three different treatment protocols had been followed for these patients in those centres in those days: The main difference was that in centres A and B the palates were closed in two stages whilst in centre C palatoplasty was performed in just one operation.
Results: The most interesting results regarding the palatal growth were that: 1. In centre C (one-stage palatoplasty) the patients had more constricted palates. 2. In centre A (two-stage palatoplasty) the patients had least often an anterior cross-bite.
Discussion and conclusion: It appears that it was possible to show once more that closing the palate in one stage at age 1 year or less is interfering most with maxillary growth. This study leads us to conclude that two-stage palatoplasty is still a valuable treatment protocol for patients with a complete unilateral cleft of lip, alveolus, and palate, especially as apparently good guidance of speech development can lead to satisfactory speech for cleft patients in whom the hard palate was closed at a later age.
Copyright © 2012 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Quantitative 3D maxillary arch evaluation of two different infant managements for unilateral cleft lip and palate.Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000 Nov;37(6):562-70. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_2000_037_0562_qmaeot_2.0.co_2. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000. PMID: 11108526
-
Sagittal growth of the facial skeleton of 6-year-old children with a complete unilateral cleft of lip, alveolus and palate treated with two different protocols.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2007 Dec;35(8):343-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2007.05.005. Epub 2007 Oct 22. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2007. PMID: 17954030
-
Effect on maxillary arch development of early 2-stage palatoplasty by modified furlow technique and conventional 1-stage palatoplasty in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Oct;67(10):2210-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.038. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009. PMID: 19761915
-
How various surgical protocols of the unilateral cleft lip and palate influence the facial growth and possible orthodontic problems? Which is the best timing of lip, palate and alveolus repair? literature review.Stomatologija. 2014;16(2):53-60. Stomatologija. 2014. PMID: 25209227 Review.
-
Cleft lip and palate surgery: an update of clinical outcomes for primary repair.Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2010 Feb;22(1):43-58. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2009.11.003. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2010. PMID: 20159477 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of conventional impression making and intraoral scanning for the study of unilateral cleft lip and palate.Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2023 Jan;63(1):16-22. doi: 10.1111/cga.12499. Epub 2022 Nov 24. Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2023. PMID: 36371642 Free PMC article.
-
Histologic Aspect of the Curved Vomerine Mucosa in Cleft Lip and Palate.Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022 Aug;59(8):1048-1055. doi: 10.1177/10556656211031419. Epub 2021 Jul 22. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022. PMID: 34291694 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Individually Designed CAD/CAM Suprastructures for Dental Reconstruction in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate.Dent J (Basel). 2023 Sep 11;11(9):212. doi: 10.3390/dj11090212. Dent J (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37754332 Free PMC article.
-
Across-surface distances after one- and two-stage palatoplasty in children with oral cleft.Braz J Med Biol Res. 2024 Oct 14;57:e13805. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X2024e13805. eCollection 2024. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2024. PMID: 39417450 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Treatment of Patients with Cleft Lip, Alveolus, and Palate: An Executive Summary.J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 20;10(21):4813. doi: 10.3390/jcm10214813. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34768332 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical