Revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cones: a randomized radiostereometric analysis with 2 years of follow-up
- PMID: 22795879
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.04.036
Revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cones: a randomized radiostereometric analysis with 2 years of follow-up
Abstract
"Trabecular Metal Cone" (TM Cone) (Zimmer, Inc, Warsaw, Ind) for reconstruction of bone loss in the proximal tibia during revision total knee arthroplasty is now optional. Forty patients were randomized to receive revision total knee arthroplasty with or without TM Cone (No TM Cone). The Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute bone loss classification and NexGen revision system were used. Radiostereometric analysis was performed with 24 months of follow-up. Maximum total point motion: stable migration was seen in the TM Cone group. No statistically significant difference was found. Segment motion analysis at 24 months showed the same net direction of rotation for the groups around the y-, z-axis and around the x-, y-axis for translation. Tibial revision implants with TM Cone result in an early stable situation with less irregular migration pattern than revision without TM Cone.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The effect of Palamed G bone cement on early migration of tibial components in total knee arthroplasty.Inflamm Res. 2004 Aug;53 Suppl 2:S159-63. doi: 10.1007/s00011-004-0362-5. Epub 2004 Aug 10. Inflamm Res. 2004. PMID: 15338069 Clinical Trial.
-
Tantalum cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. A promising short-term result with 29 cones in 21 patients.J Arthroplasty. 2013 Jun;28(6):988-93. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.09.003. Epub 2013 Feb 13. J Arthroplasty. 2013. PMID: 23414934
-
Outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cone for reconstruction of severe bone loss at the proximal tibia.Knee. 2014 Dec;21(6):1233-7. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.08.017. Epub 2014 Sep 10. Knee. 2014. PMID: 25212989
-
Porous metal metaphyseal cones for severe bone loss: when only metal will do.Bone Joint J. 2014 Nov;96-B(11 Supple A):118-21. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34197. Bone Joint J. 2014. PMID: 25381423 Review.
-
Are Trabecular Metal Cones a Valid Option to Treat Metaphyseal Bone Defects in Complex Primary and Revision Knee Arthroplasty?Joints. 2017 Dec 14;6(1):58-64. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1608950. eCollection 2018 Mar. Joints. 2017. PMID: 29675508 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Revision total knee arthroplasty: the end of the allograft era?Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 May;25(4):621-2. doi: 10.1007/s00590-015-1615-4. Epub 2015 Mar 10. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015. PMID: 25753085 No abstract available.
-
Mechanical properties of a cemented porous implant interface.Acta Orthop. 2014 Sep;85(5):531-7. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.919557. Epub 2014 May 5. Acta Orthop. 2014. PMID: 24798109 Free PMC article.
-
Midterm Outcomes of Tantalum Metal Cones for Severe Bone Loss in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.Arthroplast Today. 2021 Jan 11;7:76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.12.004. eCollection 2021 Feb. Arthroplast Today. 2021. PMID: 33521201 Free PMC article.
-
Management of metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty.Acta Biomed. 2017 Jun 7;88(2S):98-111. doi: 10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6520. Acta Biomed. 2017. PMID: 28657571 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Tibial component with and without stem extension in a trabecular metal cone construct.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Nov;25(11):3644-3652. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4271-2. Epub 2016 Sep 3. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017. PMID: 27592329 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical