Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Oct;89(1):15-24.
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.019. Epub 2012 Jul 12.

A systematic review of cognitive behavioral interventions in advanced cancer

Cathy L Campbell  1 , Lisa C Campbell
Affiliations

A systematic review of cognitive behavioral interventions in advanced cancer

Cathy L Campbell et al. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To systematically review cognitive behavioral interventions for people with advanced cancer.

Methods: A literature search was conducted using Medline©, CINAHL©, and Psych-info©.

Inclusion criteria: studies were included in the review if they met the following criteria: (1) the design was a randomized clinical trial, (2) the study tested a cognitive behavioral therapy, including psycho-educational, alternative and complementary therapies (i.e. acupuncture, relaxation), expressive, support and skill building interventions, (3) participants were adults (18 years of age or older) with advanced cancer and the (4) outcomes were directly related to the patient with advanced cancer.

Results: 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of the studies in the review: treatment effects were not statistically significant in most studies, methods were not consistently described, and samples had limited racial/ethnic diversity.

Conclusion: The interpretation of the effectiveness of the CBIs was limited by major challenges to the internal validity of the studies included in the review. The lack of data about the efficacy of CBIs to support people with advanced cancer is a gap in the current knowledge base.

Practice implications: Given the needs of people living with advanced cancer well-designed studies are needed to test interventions that will improve outcomes for people living with advanced cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2011. American Cancer Society; Atlanta: 2011.
    1. Virnig BA, Baxter NN, Haberman EB, Feldman RD, Bradley C. A matter of race: Early versus late stage diagnosis. Health Affairs. 2009;28:160–168. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peppercorn JM, Smith T, Helft P, DeBono DJ, Berry S, Wollins D, Hayes D, Von Roenn J, Schnipper LE. American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement: Toward Individualized care for patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:755–760. - PubMed
    1. Bakitas M, Lyons D, Hegel MT, Balan S, Brokaw FC, Seville J, Hull JG, Li Z, Tosteson TD, Byock I, Ahles T. Effects of a palliative care intervention on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer: The project ENABLE II randomized clinical trial. J American Med Assoc. 2009;302:741–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Hospice and Palliative Care Association. NHPCO Facts and Figures: Hospice Care in America. Retrieved March 10, 2011 from http://www.nhpco.org/files/public/Statistics_Research/Hospice_Facts_Figu....

Publication types

MeSH terms