Variation in estimated ozone-related health impacts of climate change due to modeling choices and assumptions
- PMID: 22796531
- PMCID: PMC3556604
- DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1104271
Variation in estimated ozone-related health impacts of climate change due to modeling choices and assumptions
Abstract
Background: Future climate change may cause air quality degradation via climate-induced changes in meteorology, atmospheric chemistry, and emissions into the air. Few studies have explicitly modeled the potential relationships between climate change, air quality, and human health, and fewer still have investigated the sensitivity of estimates to the underlying modeling choices.
Objectives: Our goal was to assess the sensitivity of estimated ozone-related human health impacts of climate change to key modeling choices.
Methods: Our analysis included seven modeling systems in which a climate change model is linked to an air quality model, five population projections, and multiple concentration-response functions. Using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program (BenMAP), we estimated future ozone (O(3))-related health effects in the United States attributable to simulated climate change between the years 2000 and approximately 2050, given each combination of modeling choices. Health effects and concentration-response functions were chosen to match those used in the U.S. EPA's 2008 Regulatory Impact Analysis of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for O(3).
Results: Different combinations of methodological choices produced a range of estimates of national O(3)-related mortality from roughly 600 deaths avoided as a result of climate change to 2,500 deaths attributable to climate change (although the large majority produced increases in mortality). The choice of the climate change and the air quality model reflected the greatest source of uncertainty, with the other modeling choices having lesser but still substantial effects.
Conclusions: Our results highlight the need to use an ensemble approach, instead of relying on any one set of modeling choices, to assess the potential risks associated with O(3)-related human health effects resulting from climate change.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.
Figures
Comment in
-
Expanding the range of possibility: exploring the uncertainty in projecting ozone-related health effects of climate change.Environ Health Perspect. 2012 Nov;120(11):A436. doi: 10.1289/ehp.120-a436a. Environ Health Perspect. 2012. PMID: 23117259 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Abt Associates Inc. BenMAP: Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program, User’s Manual. Bethesda, MD:Abt Associates Inc. 2010. Available: http://www.epa.gov/air/benmap/docs.html [accessed 14 October 2010]
-
- Bell ML, Goldberg R, Hogrefe C, Kinney PL, Knowlton K, Lynn B, et al. Climate change, ambient ozone, and health in 50 U.S. cities. Clim Change. 2007;82(1–2):61–76.
-
- CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) National Hospital Discharge Survey. 2008a. Available: ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Datasets/NHDS/nhds06/ [accessed 26 September 2012]
-
- CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) National Vital Statistics System. Public Use Data File Documentation: Mortality Multiple Cause-of-Death, 2004–2006. 2008b. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/mortality_public_use_data.htm [accessed 21 September 2012]
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
