Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug 15;189(4):1708-16.
doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201271. Epub 2012 Jul 13.

Differential requirement for CD70 and CD80/CD86 in dendritic cell-mediated activation of tumor-tolerized CD8 T cells

Affiliations

Differential requirement for CD70 and CD80/CD86 in dendritic cell-mediated activation of tumor-tolerized CD8 T cells

S Peter Bak et al. J Immunol. .

Abstract

A major obstacle to efficacious T cell-based cancer immunotherapy is the tolerizing-tumor microenvironment that rapidly inactivates tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. In an autochthonous model of prostate cancer, we have previously shown that intratumoral injection of Ag-loaded dendritic cells (DCs) delays T cell tolerance induction as well as refunctionalizes already tolerized T cells in the tumor tissue. In this study, we have defined molecular interactions that mediate the effects of DCs. We show that pretreating Ag-loaded DCs with anti-CD70 Ab abolishes the ability of DCs to delay tumor-mediated T cell tolerance induction, whereas interfering with 4-1BBL, CD80, CD86, or both CD80 and CD86 had no significant effect. In contrast, CD80(-/-) or CD80(-/-)CD86(-/-) DCs failed to reactivate already tolerized T cells in the tumor tissue, whereas interfering with CD70 and 4-1BBL had no effect. Furthermore, despite a high level of programmed death 1 expression by tumor-infiltrating T cells and programmed death ligand 1 expression in the prostate, disrupting programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 interaction did not enhance T cell function in this model. These findings reveal dynamic requirements for costimulatory signals to overcome tumor-induced tolerance and have significant implications for developing more effective cancer immunotherapies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
PD-1 is expressed on prostate resident T cells and PD-L1 on the prostate stroma. Naive 2C T cells were transferred into TRP-SIY mice, followed by intranasal infection with WSN-SIY virus. Prostates were harvested day 13 and day 36 post transfer, and Thy1.1+2C TCR+ cells were analyzed for PD-1 (A), Tim3 (B), or LAG-3 (C) expression. Histograms show relative levels of cell surface expression on 2C T cells at day 13 (gray) or day 36 (black), compared with isotype control (filled gray line). (D) Prostates from TRP-SIY (black) and C57BL/6-SIY (gray) mice were harvested and digested into single-cell suspension and stained with PD-L1 or isotype (filled gray line) and analyzed by flow cytometry. Histograms show relative levels of PD-L1 expression on prostate cells. (E) Sectioned prostates of TRP-SIY and C57BL/6-SIY mice were stained for PD-L1, visualized with peroxidase staining (brown), and counterstained with eosin (red). Arrows indicate areas of positive staining. Scale bars, 100 µm.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Modulation of the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction between 2C T cells and prostate or BMDCs does not affect T cell activity. (A) Naive 2C T cells were transferred into PD-L1+/ or PD-L1−/− TRP-SIY mice, along with intranasal infection with WSN-SIY virus. On day 14, 2C T cells were harvested from prostate tissue, stimulated with SIY peptide, and analyzed for IFN-γ expression. CD8 versus Thy1.1 plots were gated on all live cells from prostate. IFN-γ versus Thy1.1 plots were gated on CD8+ Thy1.1+ cells. Representative FACS plots from three experiments are shown. (B) Experimental scheme for analyzing BMDC-mediated delay of tolerance induction and refunctionalization of tolerized 2C cells in the prostate of TRP-SIY mice. On day 0, naive 2C T cells were adoptively transferred into TRP-SIY mice and given intranasal infection with WSN-SIY virus. On day 7 or 30, mice were injected intraprostatically with PBS or 1 × 106 ex vivo matured SIY-loaded wild-type (WT) or PD-L1−/− BMDCs. At 6–7 d later, 2C T cells were harvested from prostate tissue, stimulated with SIY peptide and analyzed for IFN-γ expression. (C) Representative plots of flow cytometry analyses of cells from prostate tissues of mice that were injected with PBS, wild type (WT), or PD-L1−/− BMDCs on either day 7 or day 30 after initial 2C cell transfer. 2C TCR versus Thy1.1 plots were gated on all live cells from prostate. IFN-γ versus Thy1.1 staining was gated on 2C TCR+ Thy1.1+ cells. The numbers indicate percentage of IFNγ+ cells. (D and E) Percentages (mean ± SD) of IFN-γ+ 2C cells from three independent experiments normalized to PBS control. Number of mice for each treatment are indicated. *p < 0.05 comparing DC versus PBS injection. (F and G) Number of 2C TCR+Thy1.1+ cells from prostates injected with PBS, WT, or PD-L1−/− BMDCs either 7 d (F) or 30 d (G) after T cell transfer and analyzed after 6 d (F) or 7 d (G) later. Graphs are from three independent experiments, with at least four mice per group. NS, Compared with PBS control.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
BMDCs act directly on 2C T cells in the prostate tissue. (A) TRP-SIY mice were injected intraprostatically with PBS-or SIY-loaded wild-type (WT) BMDCs on either day 7 or day 30 after initial 2C cell transfer and infection. At 6–7 d later, Thy1.1CD8+ T cells were harvested from prostate tissue and analyzed for IFN-γ expression. IFN-γ versus CD8 plots were gated on live CD8+ Thy1.1 cells. The numbers indicate percentage of IFN-γ+ cells. (B) TRP-SIY mice were injected with PBS or WT-DCs in the prostate. At 6 d later, prostate tissues were dissociated, and single-cell suspensions were stained with CD11c and CD80, CD86, CD70, 4-1BBL (black line), or isotype control (filled gray line). Histograms are gated on live CD11c+ cells. (C) TRP-SIY mice were injected with PBS-or SIY-loaded WT BMDCs on either day 7 or day 30 after initial 2C cell transfer and infection. At 6–7 d later, Thy1.1+ 2C T cells were harvested from prostate tissue, stimulated with SIY peptide, and analyzed for IL-2 expression. IFN-γ versus Thy1.1 flow cytometry plots were gated on live 2C TCR+ Thy1.1+ cells. The numbers indicate percentage of IL-2+ cells. (D) 2C T cells recovered from the prostates of TRP-SIY were assayed for CD44 expression 13 d post transfer and infection with WSN-SIY virus. Histograms are gated on Thy1.1+2C TCR+ T cells with either CD44 (black line) or isotype (filled gray line) and representative of three independent experiments. (E) TRP-SIY mice were injected with PBS, SIY peptide, or LPS-activated wild type (WT) BMDCs not pulsed with SIY peptide 7 d after initial 2C cell transfer and infection. At 6 d later, Thy1.1+ 2C T cells were harvested from prostate tissue, stimulated with SIY peptide, and analyzed for IFN-γ expression. IFN-γ versus Thy1.1 flow cytometry plots were gated on live 2C TCR+ Thy1.1+ cells. The numbers indicate percentage of IFNγ+ cells.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
CD80 and CD86 expression on BMDCs is necessary for 2C T cell reactivation, but not the delay of 2C T cell tolerance. (A) Day 7 LPS-activated BMDCs were stained with anti-CD11c, -CD80, or -CD86 Abs (black line) or isotype control (filled gray line). CD80 and CD86 expression histograms are gated on CD11c+ cells. (B and C) Mice were treated and cells analyzed as in Fig. 2B, with prostate tissues injected with PBS, wild-type (WT), CD80−/−, CD86−/−, or CD80−/−CD86−/− BMDCs on either (B) day 7 or (C) day 30 after initial 2C cell transfer and infection. Percentages (mean ± SD) of IFN-γ+ 2C cells from at least three independent experiments are normalized to PBS control. Number of mice for each treatment is indicated. *p < 0.05, comparing DC with PBS injection, #p < 0.05 comparing WT with knockout DCs, §p < 0.05 comparing CD80−/−CD86−/− DCs with CD80−/− DCs. (D) At 30 d post 2C cell transfer and infection, TRP-SIY mice were injected intraprostatically with PBS, or SIY-loaded WT, CD80−/−, CD80−/−/CD86−/− BMDCs. On day 36, mice were injected retro-orbitally with a 1:1 mixture of SIY-pulsed (CFSEHi) and unpulsed (CFSELo) activated T cells (Thy1.1+). The following day, the proportions of CFSEHi versus CFSELo target cells were determined by flow cytometry. CFSE histograms are shown for live Thy1.1+ cells. Numbers indicate percentage of CFSE+ cells. Representative data from one of the two experiments are shown.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
CD70 is required for DC-mediated delay in 2C T cell tolerance. (A) Day 7 LPS-activated BMDCs were stained for CD11c plus CD70, 4-1BBL (black line), or isotype control (filled gray line). Histograms are gated on CD11c+ cells. (B) F(ab'′)2 fragments are confirmed to maintain their Ag-binding capacity using a competition assay. BMDCs were incubated with 10 µg/ml of fluorescently labeled full-length Ab in the presence of the same amount of either F(ab'′)2 of interest or control anti-FcR F(ab '′)2 fragment. The cells were then stained with anti-CD11c and analyzed by flow cytometry. Center histogram shows binding of fluorescently labeled anti-CD70 to BMDCs in the presence of either anti-CD70 F(ab'′ )2 (gray) or control anti-FcR F(ab'′)2(black). Left histogram shows binding of fluorescently labeled anti-CD16/CD32 to BMDCs in the presence of either anti-FcR F(ab'′)2 (gray) or control anti-CD70 F(ab'′ )2(black). Right histogram shows binding of fluorescently labeled anti– 4-1BBL to BMDCs in the presence of either anti–4-1BBL F(ab'′)2 (gray) or control anti-FcR F(ab'′)2 (black). Histograms are gated on CD11c+ cells. (C) Experiments were conducted as in Fig. 2B with SIY-pulsed BMDCs incubated with anti-FcR, CD70, or 4-1BBL F(ab'′)2 fragments. Shown are percentages (mean ± SD) of IFN-γ+ 2C cells from three independent experiments normalized to PBS control. Number of mice for each treatment is indicated. (D) As in (C), except BMDCs were injected on day 30 post T cell transfer, and analysis was carried out on day 37. Shown are percentages (mean ± SD) of IFN-γ+ 2C cells from three independent experiments normalized to PBS control. Number of mice for each treatment is indicated. *p < 0.05 comparing DC with PBS injection, #p < 0.05 comparing BMDCs treated with anti-CD70 F(ab'′)2 and those treated with anti-FcR F(ab'′)2. (E) Day 7 LPS-matured BMDCs were labeled with CFSE and incubated with F(ab'′)2 fragments specific for FcR or CD70. DCs (10 × 103 per mouse) were surgically injected into one of the dorsal prostate lobes. At 3 and 5 d later, mice were sacrificed, and CSFE+ DCs in each of the prostate tissues were assessed by flow cytometry. Shown are the average numbers of DCs (±SD) from three prostates per group, per time point.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
CD27 expression is progressively lost on TRP-SY prostate resident 2C T cells. (A) Naive 2C T cells pooled from spleens and lymph nodes were assayed for expression of CD28, 4-1BB, and CD27. Histograms are gated on Thy1.1+ 2C TCR+ cells stained with isotype Ab (shaded gray) or specific Ab (black line). (B) Naive Thy1.1+ 2C T cells were retro-orbitally injected into TRP-SIY mice, along with intranasal infection with WSN-SIY virus. Mice were sacrificed 13 (bold black line), 23 (gray line), and 36 (thin black line) d post transfer, and CD28, 4-1BB, and CD27 expression on prostate resident 2C T cells was assayed by flow cytometry. Histograms are gated on live 2C TCR+ Thy1.1+ cells with isotype Ab (shaded gray) or specific Ab (black line). (C) Mean fluorescence intensity of CD28, CD27, or 4-1BB staining from Thy1.1+2C TCR+T cells from naive mice or recovered from prostates at indicated times post transfer and WSN-SIY infection. Data shown are from at least two independent experiments (mean ± SD). (D) Time course of CD27 expression on 2C T cells recovered from TRAMP and C57BL/6 (B6) prostates 13 (bold black line), 23 (gray line), and 36 (thin black line) d post transfer. (E) As above, with 2C transfer/WSN-SIY infection and analysis of CD27 on 2C TCR+Thy1.1+ 2C T cells 13 (bold black line), 23 (gray line), and 36 (thin black line) d post transfer in spleens from TRP-SIY, TRAMP, and B6 mice.

References

    1. Rosenberg SA, Restifo NP, Yang JC, Morgan RA, Dudley ME. Adoptive cell transfer: a clinical path to effective cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:299–308. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gulley JL, Drake CG. Immunotherapy for prostate cancer: recent advances, lessons learned, and areas for further research. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:3884–3891. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sharpe AH. Mechanisms of costimulation. Immunol Rev. 2009;229:5–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fife BT, Bluestone JA. Control of peripheral T-cell tolerance and autoimmunity via the CTLA-4 and PD-1 pathways. Immunol Rev. 2008;224:166–182. - PubMed
    1. Pilon-Thomas S, Mackay A, Vohra N, Mule JJ. Blockade of programmed death ligand 1 enhances the therapeutic efficacy of combination immunotherapy against melanoma. J Immunol. 2010;184:3442–3449. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms