Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul 16:12:55.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-55.

Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS): international standards for validation

Affiliations

Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS): international standards for validation

Ralph H B Benedict et al. BMC Neurol. .

Abstract

An international expert consensus committee recently recommended a brief battery of tests for cognitive evaluation in multiple sclerosis. The Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS) battery includes tests of mental processing speed and memory. Recognizing that resources for validation will vary internationally, the committee identified validation priorities, to facilitate international acceptance of BICAMS. Practical matters pertaining to implementation across different languages and countries were discussed. Five steps to achieve optimal psychometric validation were proposed. In Step 1, test stimuli should be standardized for the target culture or language under consideration. In Step 2, examiner instructions must be standardized and translated, including all information from manuals necessary for administration and interpretation. In Step 3, samples of at least 65 healthy persons should be studied for normalization, matched to patients on demographics such as age, gender and education. The objective of Step 4 is test-retest reliability, which can be investigated in a small sample of MS and/or healthy volunteers over 1-3 weeks. Finally, in Step 5, criterion validity should be established by comparing MS and healthy controls. At this time, preliminary studies are underway in a number of countries as we move forward with this international assessment tool for cognition in MS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Faux stimuli for Symbol Digit Modalities Test.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Faux stimuli for California Verbal Learning Test Second Edition.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Faux stimuli for Brief Visuospatial Memory Test Revised.

References

    1. Hauser SL, Oksenberg JR, Hauser SL, Oksenberg JR. The neurobiology of multiple sclerosis: genes, inflammation, and neurodegeneration. Neuron. 2006;52:61–76. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Trapp BD, Nave KA. Multiple sclerosis: an immune or neurodegenerative disorder? Annu Rev Neurosci. 2008;31:247–269. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094313. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rao SM, Leo GJ, Bernardin L, Unverzagt F. Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. I. Frequency, patterns, and prediction. Neurology. 1991;41:685–691. doi: 10.1212/WNL.41.5.685. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benedict RHB, Cookfair D, Gavett R. et al.Validity of the Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis (MACFIMS) J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006;12:549–558. - PubMed
    1. Patti F, Amato M, Trojano M. et al.Cognitive impairment and its relation with disease measures in mildly disabled patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: baseline results from the Cognitive Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis (COGIMUS) study. Mult Scler. 2009;15:779–788. doi: 10.1177/1352458509105544. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types