Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun;88(3):325-33.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.06.182. Epub 2012 Jul 16.

I do…do you? Dependence and biological sex moderate daters' cortisol responses when accommodating a partner's thoughts about marriage

Affiliations

I do…do you? Dependence and biological sex moderate daters' cortisol responses when accommodating a partner's thoughts about marriage

Elizabeth A Schoenfeld et al. Int J Psychophysiol. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

We examined how daters' levels of relationship dependence interact with men's and women's degree of accommodation during a likelihood of marriage discussion to predict cortisol levels at the conclusion of the discussion. Upon arriving at the laboratory, couple members were separated and asked to graph their perceived likelihood of one day marrying each other. Couples were reunited and instructed to create a joint graph depicting their agreed-upon chance of marriage. For the majority of couples, negotiating their likelihood of marriage required one or both partners to accommodate each other's presumed likelihood of marriage. Multilevel analyses revealed a significant Dependence×Accommodation×Sex interaction. For women who increased their likelihood of marriage, feelings of dependence predicted heightened levels of cortisol relative to baseline; we suggest such a response is indicative of eustress. Among men, those who accommodated by decreasing their likelihood of marriage experienced significantly lower levels of cortisol to the extent that they were less dependent on their partners. Discussion focuses on why men and women show different physiological reactions in response to seemingly favorable outcomes from a relationship discussion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Predicted means of cortisol levels at the conclusion of the joint graphing activity for men and women as a function of dependence and accommodation.

Similar articles

References

    1. Acitelli LK, Young AM. Gender and thought in relationships. In: Fletcher GJO, Fitness J, editors. Knowledge Structures in Close Relationships: A Social Psychological Approach. Erlbaum; Mahwah, NJ: 1996. pp. 147–168.
    1. Afifi WA, Burgoon JK. “We never talk about that”: A comparison of cross-sexfriendships and dating relationships on uncertainty and topic avoidance. Pers Relat. 1998;5:255–272.
    1. Afifi WA, Guerrero LK. Motivations underlying topic avoidance in close relationships. In: Petronio S, editor. Balancing the Secrets of Private Disclosures. Lawrence Erlbaum; Mahwah, NJ: 2000. pp. 165–179.
    1. Agnew CR, Martz JM, Rusbult CA. Measuring interdependence in close relationships. 2003 Manuscript in preparation.
    1. Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage; Newbury Park, CA: 1991.

Publication types