Social influences on clinical outcomes of patients with ovarian cancer
- PMID: 22802321
- PMCID: PMC3410403
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.4411
Social influences on clinical outcomes of patients with ovarian cancer
Abstract
Purpose: Previous research has demonstrated relationships of social support with disease-related biomarkers in patients with ovarian cancer. However, the clinical relevance of these findings to patient outcomes has not been established. This prospective study examined how social support relates to long-term survival among consecutive patients with ovarian cancer. We focused on two types of social support: social attachment, a type of emotional social support reflecting connections with others, and instrumental social support reflecting the availability of tangible assistance.
Patients and methods: Patients were prospectively recruited during a presurgical clinic visit and completed surveys before surgery. One hundred sixty-eight patients with histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer were observed from the date of surgery until death or December 2010. Clinical information was obtained from medical records.
Results: In a Cox regression model, adjusting for disease stage, grade, histology, residual disease, and age, greater social attachment was associated with a lower likelihood of death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.98; P = .018). The median survival time for patients with low social attachment categorized on a median split of 15 was 3.35 years (95% CI, 2.56 to 4.15 years). In contrast, by study completion, 59% of patients with high social attachment were still alive after 4.70 years. No significant association was found between instrumental social support and survival, even after adjustment for covariates.
Conclusion: Social attachment is associated with a survival advantage for patients with ovarian cancer. Clinical implications include the importance of screening for deficits in the social environment and consideration of support activities during adjuvant treatment.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2010. American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts & Figures 2010.
-
- Helgeson VS, Cohen S. Social support and adjustment to cancer: Reconciling descriptive, correlational, and intervention research. Health Psychol . 1996;15:135–148. - PubMed
-
- Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull . 1985;98:310–357. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- P30 CA016672/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 CA109298/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- G0902418/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- CA104825/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 CA104825/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- P50 CA083639/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- R21 CA088293/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- P50CA083639/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 CA140933/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA140933/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA116778/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA109298/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 CA116778/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
