HIV treatment as prevention: debate and commentary--will early infection compromise treatment-as-prevention strategies?
- PMID: 22802728
- PMCID: PMC3393667
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001232
HIV treatment as prevention: debate and commentary--will early infection compromise treatment-as-prevention strategies?
Abstract
Universal HIV testing and immediate antiretroviral therapy for infected individuals has been proposed as a way of reducing the transmission of HIV and thereby bringing the HIV epidemic under control. It is unclear whether transmission during early HIV infection--before individuals are likely to have been diagnosed with HIV and started on antiretroviral therapy--will compromise the effectiveness of treatment as prevention. This article presents two opposing viewpoints by Powers, Miller, and Cohen, and Williams and Dye, followed by a commentary by Fraser.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
-
- Ho DD. Time to hit HIV, early and hard. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:450–451. - PubMed
-
- Hosseinipour M, Cohen MS, Vernazza PL, Kashuba AD. Can antiretroviral therapy be used to prevent sexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1? Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:1391–1395. - PubMed
-
- Montaner JS, Hogg R, Wood E, Kerr T, Tyndall M, et al. The case for expanding access to highly active antiretroviral therapy to curb the growth of the HIV epidemic. Lancet. 2006;368:531–536. - PubMed
-
- Granich RM, Gilks CF, Dye C, De Cock KM, Williams BG. Universal voluntary HIV testing with immediate antiretroviral therapy as a strategy for elimination of HIV transmission: a mathematical model. Lancet. 2009;373:48–57. - PubMed
