Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Feb;36(1):25-34.
doi: 10.1007/s00270-012-0440-y. Epub 2012 Jul 18.

Portal vein embolization before liver resection: a systematic review

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Portal vein embolization before liver resection: a systematic review

K P van Lienden et al. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: This is a review of literature on the indications, technique, and outcome of portal vein embolization (PVE).

Methods: A systematic literature search on outcome of PVE from 1990 to 2011 was performed in Medline, Cochrane, and Embase databases.

Results: Forty-four articles were selected, including 1,791 patients with a mean age of 61 ± 4.1 years. Overall technical success rate was 99.3 %. The mean hypertrophy rate of the FRL after PVE was 37.9 ± 0.1 %. In 70 patients (3.9 %), surgery was not performed because of failure of PVE (clinical success rate 96.1 %). In 51 patients (2.8 %), the hypertrophy response was insufficient to perform liver resection. In the other 17 cases, 12 did not technically succeed (0.7 %) and 7 caused a complication leading to unresectability (0.4 %). In 6.1 %, resection was cancelled because of local tumor progression after PVE. Major complications were seen in 2.5 %, and the mortality rate was 0.1 %. A head-to-head comparison shows a negative effect of liver cirrhosis on hypertrophy response. The use of n-butyl cyanoacrylate seems to have a greater effect on hypertrophy, but the difference with other embolization materials did not reach statistical significance. No difference in regeneration is seen in patients with cholestasis or chemotherapy.

Conclusions: Preoperative PVE has a high technical and clinical success rate. Liver cirrhosis has a negative effect on regeneration, but cholestasis and chemotherapy do not seem to have an influence on the hypertrophy response. The use of n-butyl cyanoacrylate may result in a greater hypertrophy response compared with other embolization materials used.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart showing selection of papers for analysis

References

    1. Garcea G, Ong SL, Maddern GJ. Predicting liver failure following major hepatectomy. Dig Liver Dis. 2009;41:798–806. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2009.01.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rous P, Larimore LD. Relation of the portal blood to liver maintenance: a demonstration of liver atrophy conditional on compensation. J Exp Med. 1920;31:609–632. doi: 10.1084/jem.31.5.609. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Honjo I, Kozaka S. Extensive resection of the liver in two stages. Rev Int Hepatol. 1965;15:309–319. - PubMed
    1. Kinoshita H, Sakai K, Hirohashi K, et al. Preoperative portal vein embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg. 1986;10:803–808. doi: 10.1007/BF01655244. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Azoulay D, Castaing D, Krissat J, et al. Percutaneous portal vein embolization increases the feasibility and safety of major liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in injured liver. Ann Surg. 2000;232:665–672. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200011000-00008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources