Evaluation of bacterial contamination after "pure" (totally) transvaginal NOTES diagnostic peritoneoscopy with biopsies in swine: a comparative study with laparoscopy
- PMID: 22806514
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2448-4
Evaluation of bacterial contamination after "pure" (totally) transvaginal NOTES diagnostic peritoneoscopy with biopsies in swine: a comparative study with laparoscopy
Abstract
Introduction: Bacterial contamination from viscerotomy is a barrier to natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). The aim of this survival study is to evaluate pure (totally) transvaginal NOTES bacterial contamination compared with laparoscopy in pigs.
Methods: Twelve adult female pigs underwent peritoneoscopy with liver and peritoneal biopsies, using either laparoscopy (Glap, six animals) or pure transvaginal (GNOTES) access, and were maintained alive for 7 days. In all animals, blood cultures were taken at baseline, and after 24 h and 7 days postoperatively. Swab cultures from vagina (GNOTES) and skin (Glap) were obtained pre- and post-antisepsis. Peritoneal fluid culture was obtained at necropsy. For statistical analysis, Glap and GNOTES were compared for presence of positive bacterial cultures (qualitative bacterial analysis) using Fisher's test, with level of significance set at p < 0.05.
Results: All animals had good postoperative outcome. One animal had transient perioperative bleeding from a transvaginal access. Two animals in Glap and one in GNOTES had positive blood cultures after the procedure. All animals from GNOTES and Glap presented with mixed flora pre-antisepsis. After antisepsis, one animal (GNOTES) presented with a positive vaginal swab culture (a single bacterial strain was identified). There was no positive skin swab culture in Glap. There were no signs of intra-abdominal infection at necropsy. In two animals, one from Glap and another from GNOTES, intra-abdominal culture was positive for Corynebacterium spp. and Escherichia coli, respectively. There was no correlation between the bacterial flora found at the access site and in the peritoneal cultures.
Conclusions: Pure transvaginal peritoneoscopy with liver and peritoneal biopsy in swine is feasible and associated with bacterial contamination comparable to laparoscopy. Peritoneal bacterial contamination was clinically insignificant after 1 week postoperatively. Preoperative antisepsis provided significant reduction of bacterial load prior to transvaginal and laparoscopic procedures.
Similar articles
-
Liver and peritoneal biopsy by laparoscopy or notes in pigs: comparison of operative parameters and postoperative evolution.Rev Col Bras Cir. 2011 Jul-Aug;38(4):253-9. doi: 10.1590/s0100-69912011000400009. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2011. PMID: 21971859 English, Portuguese.
-
Infection during natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery peritoneoscopy: a randomized comparative study in a survival porcine model.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 Nov-Dec;18(6):741-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.08.001. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011. PMID: 22024260
-
Pure retroperitoneal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) transvaginal nephrectomy using standard laparoscopic instruments: a safety and feasibility study in a porcine model.BMC Urol. 2016 Jun 11;16(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12894-016-0145-7. BMC Urol. 2016. PMID: 27286863 Free PMC article.
-
A review of 130 humans enrolled in transgastric NOTES protocols at a single institution.Surg Endosc. 2011 Apr;25(4):1004-11. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1369-3. Epub 2010 Oct 26. Surg Endosc. 2011. PMID: 20976500 Review.
-
Comparison of Major Clinical Outcomes Between Transvaginal NOTES and Traditional Laparoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.J Surg Res. 2019 Dec;244:278-290. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.012. Epub 2019 Jul 11. J Surg Res. 2019. PMID: 31302326
Cited by
-
Hybrid NOTES transvaginal intraperitoneal onlay mesh in abdominal wall hernias: an alternative to traditional laparoscopic procedures.Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3712-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4141-x. Epub 2015 Mar 12. Surg Endosc. 2015. PMID: 25761560
-
Transvaginal specimen removal in minimally invasive surgery.World J Urol. 2016 Jun;34(6):779-87. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1770-1. Epub 2016 Jan 30. World J Urol. 2016. PMID: 26832349 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous