Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Dec;13(4):203-10.
doi: 10.1007/s10195-012-0205-z. Epub 2012 Jul 18.

Is computer-assisted total knee replacement for beginners or experts? Prospective study among three groups of patients treated by surgeons with different levels of experience

Norberto Confalonieri  1 , Cesare Chemello, Pietro Cerveri, Alfonso Manzotti
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Is computer-assisted total knee replacement for beginners or experts? Prospective study among three groups of patients treated by surgeons with different levels of experience

Norberto Confalonieri et al. J Orthop Traumatol. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Computer-assisted total knee replacement (TKR) has been shown to improve radiographic alignment and therefore the clinical outcome. Outliers with greater than 3° of varus or valgus malalignment in TKR can suffer higher failure rates. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of experience with both computer navigation and knee replacement surgery on the frequency of errors in intraoperative bone cuts and implant alignment, as well as the actual learning curve.

Materials and methods: Three homogeneous groups who underwent computer-assisted TKR were included in the study: group A [surgery performed by a surgeon experienced in both TKR and computer-assisted surgery (CAS)], B [surgery performed by a surgeon experienced in TKR but not CAS], and C [surgery performed by a general orthopedic surgeon]. In other words, all of the surgeons had different levels of experience in TKR and CAS, and each group was treated by only one of the surgeons. Cutting errors, number of re-cuts, complications, and mean surgical times were recorded. Frontal femoral component angle, frontal tibial component angle, hip-knee-ankle angle, and component slopes were evaluated.

Results: The number of cutting errors varied significantly: the lowest number was recorded for TKR performed by the surgeon with experience in CAS. Superior results were achieved in relation to final mechanical axis alignment by the surgeon experienced in CAS compared to the other surgeons. However, the total number of outliers showed no statistically significant difference among the three surgeons. After 11 cases, there were no differences in the number of re-cuts between groups A and C, and after 9 cases there were no differences in surgical time between groups A and B.

Conclusion: A beginner can reproduce the results of an expert TKR surgeon by means of navigation (i.e., CAS) after a learning curve of 16 cases; this represents the break-even point after which no statistically significant difference is observed between the expert surgeon and the beginner utilizing CAS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Intraoperative control of the cuts
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Femoral slope and tibial slope
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mechanical axis
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Analysis of postoperative angles
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Number of cases after which there was no statistical difference among the surgeons in terms of the number of re-cuts needed (i.e., the break-even point). After 11 cases, the trainee obtained the same results as the expert
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Number of cases after which there was no statistical difference in surgical time (i.e., the break-even point). After 9 cases, the trainee obtained the same results as the expert, and after 16 cases the beginner had caught up with the expert
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lewold S, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Reduced failure rate in knee prosthetic surgery with improved implantation technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;287:94–97. - PubMed
    1. Lotke PA, Ecker ML. Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59:77–79. - PubMed
    1. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:153–156 - PubMed
    1. Ek ET, Dowsey MM, Tse LF, Riazi A, Love BR, Stoney JD, Choong PF. Comparison of functional and radiological outcomes after computer-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a matched-control retrospective study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2008;16(2):192–196. - PubMed
    1. Longstaff LM, Sloan K, Stamp N, Scaddan M, Beaver R (2009) Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty 24(4):570–578 - PubMed

Publication types