Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov;85(1019):1477-81.
doi: 10.1259/bjr/53905073. Epub 2012 Jul 17.

Fluoroscopically guided nose tube drainage of mediastinal abscesses in post-operative gastro-oesophageal anastomotic leakage

Affiliations

Fluoroscopically guided nose tube drainage of mediastinal abscesses in post-operative gastro-oesophageal anastomotic leakage

Q Y Xu et al. Br J Radiol. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the technical success rates and clinical effectiveness of fluoroscopically guided nose tube drainage of mediastinal abscesses and a nasojejunum feeding tube in post-operative gastro-oesophageal anastomotic leakage (GEAL).

Methods: From January 2006 to June 2011, 18 cases of post-operative GEAL with mediastinal abscesses after oesophagectomy with intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomotic procedures for oesophageal and cardiac carcinoma were treated by insertion of a nose drainage tube and nasojejunum feeding tube under fluoroscopic guidance. We evaluated the feasibility of two-tube insertion to facilitate leakage site closure and complete resolution of the abscess, and the patients' nutritional benefit was also evaluated by checking the serum albumin level between pre- and post-enteral feeding via the feeding tube.

Results: The two tubes were placed successfully under fluoroscopic guidance in 18 patients (100%). The procedure time for two-tube insertion ranged from 20 to 40 min (mean 30 min). 17 patients (94%) achieved leakage site closure after two-tube insertion and had a good tolerance of two tubes in the nasal cavity. The serum albumin level was significant, increased from pre-enteral feeding (2.49 ± 0.42 g dl(-1)) to the post-enteral feeding (3.58 ± 0.47 g dl(-1)) via the feeding tube (p<0.001). The duration of follow-up ranged from 1 to 49 months (mean 19 months).

Conclusion: The insertion of nose tube drainage and a nasojejunum feeding tube under fluoroscopic guidance is safe, and it provides effective relief from mediastinal abscesses in GEAL after oesophagectomy. Moreover, our findings indicate that two-tube insertion may be used as a selective procedure to treat mediastinal abscesses in post-operative GEAL. Advances in knowledge Directive drainage of mediastinal abscesses in post-operative GEAL may be an effective treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The intrathoracic anastomotic leak was confirmed by CT at 1 week post-operation. The fistula located in the posterior mediastinum (white arrow).
Figure 2
Figure 2
A nose drainage tube (white arrow) was inserted through the fistula with fluoroscopic guidance and the distal tip of the drainage tube was positioned at the bottom of the abscess cavity. A feeding nasojejunum tube (black arrow) was placed during interventional operation for post-operative enteral nutrition supply.
Figure 3
Figure 3
11 days post-operation, the fistula had become smaller; we changed the position of the drainage tube to keep optimum drainage.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The fistula closed on 14 days post-operation. The fistula’s closure was testified by CT and gastrointestinal series.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The clinical success of the operation was confirmed by follow-up CT examination.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Patil PK, Patel SG, Mistry RC, Deshpande RK, Desai PB. Cancer of the esophagus: esophagogastric anastomotic leak-a retrospective study of predisposing factors. J Surg Oncol 1992;49:163–7 - PubMed
    1. Dewar L, Gelfand G, Finley RJ, Evans K, Inculet R, Nelems B. Factors affecting cervical anastomotic leak and stricture formation following esophagogastrectomy and gastric tube interposition. Am J Surg 1992;163:484–9 - PubMed
    1. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements. Ann Surg 1999;230:392–400 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Urschel JD. Esophagogastrectomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review. Am J Surg 1995;169:634–40 - PubMed
    1. Sauvanet A, Baltar J, Le Mee J, Belghiti J. Diagnosis and conservative management of intrathoracic leakage after oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 1998;85:1446–9 - PubMed