Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul 14;18(26):3443-50.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i26.3443.

Anticoagulation therapy prevents portal-splenic vein thrombosis after splenectomy with gastroesophageal devascularization

Affiliations

Anticoagulation therapy prevents portal-splenic vein thrombosis after splenectomy with gastroesophageal devascularization

Wei Lai et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Aim: To compare the incidence of early portal or splenic vein thrombosis (PSVT) in patients treated with irregular and regular anticoagulantion after splenectomy with gastroesophageal devascularization.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 301 patients who underwent splenectomy with gastroesophageal devascularization for portal hypertension due to cirrhosis between April 2004 and July 2010. Patients were categorized into group A with irregular anticoagulation and group B with regular anticoagulation, respectively. Group A (153 patients) received anticoagulant monotherapy for an undesignated time period or with aspirin or warfarin without low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) irregularly. Group B (148 patients) received subcutaneous injection of LMWH routinely within the first 5 d after surgery, followed by oral warfarin and aspirin for one month regularly. The target prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR) was 1.25-1.50. Platelet and PT/INR were monitored. Color Doppler imaging was performed to monitor PSVT as well as the effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy.

Results: The patients' data were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Among the patients, 94 developed early postoperative mural PSVT, including 63 patients in group A (63/153, 41.17%) and 31 patients in group B (31/148, 20.94%). There were 50 (32.67%) patients in group A and 27 (18.24%) in group B with mural PSVT in the main trunk of portal vein. After the administration of thrombolytic, anticoagulant and anti-aggregation therapy, complete or partial thrombus dissolution achieved in 50 (79.37%) in group A and 26 (83.87%) in group B.

Conclusion: Regular anticoagulation therapy can reduce the incidence of PSVT in patients who undergo splenectomy with gastroesophageal devascularization, and regular anticoagulant therapy is safer and more effective than irregular anticoagulant therapy. Early and timely thrombolytic therapy is imperative and feasible for the prevention of PSVT.

Keywords: Anticoagulation regimen; Portal or splenic vein thrombosis; Portal vein hypertension; Splenectomy with gastroesophageal devascularization; Thrombolytic therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Changes in platelet count and prothrombin time/international normalized ratio in group A and group B. It was not different in platelet (PLT) between the two groups (P = 0.981), but it was statistically different in prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR) between the two groups (P = 0.020). PT/INR in group A had no sequential changes pre- and post-operatively (P = 0.479) and PT/INR in group B was increasing gradually from postoperative day 7 with statistical difference (P = 0.003). POD: Postoperative day.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Changes in prothrombin time/international normalized ratio in patients without portal or splenic vein thrombosis and portal or splenic vein thrombosis. In group A, patients with or without portal or splenic vein thrombosis (PSVT) had similar prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR), and the difference was not significant between the two subgroups. Patients with or without PSVT presented different PT/INR only at day 14 after surgery, with statistical significance (1.23 ± 0.17 vs 1.30 ± 0.21, P = 0.037) by Student’s t test. In group B, patients with or without PSVT had different PT/INR only at day 14 after surgery, with statistical significance (1.18 ± 0.14 vs 1.28 ± 0.21, P = 0.017) by Student’s t test. POD: Postoperative day.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kinjo N, Kawanaka H, Akahoshi T, Tomikawa M, Yamashita N, Konishi K, Tanoue K, Shirabe K, Hashizume M, Maehara Y. Risk factors for portal venous thrombosis after splenectomy in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Br J Surg. 2010;97:910–916. - PubMed
    1. Yoshida M, Watanabe Y, Horiuchi A, Yamamoto Y, Sugishita H, Kawachi K. Portal and splenic venous thrombosis after splenectomy in patients with hypersplenism. Hepatogastroenterology. 2009;56:538–541. - PubMed
    1. Fujita F, Lyass S, Otsuka K, Giordano L, Rosenbaum DL, Khalili TM, Phillips EH. Portal vein thrombosis following splenectomy: identification of risk factors. Am Surg. 2003;69:951–956. - PubMed
    1. Amitrano L, Guardascione MA, Brancaccio V, Margaglione M, Manguso F, Iannaccone L, Grandone E, Balzano A. Risk factors and clinical presentation of portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2004;40:736–741. - PubMed
    1. Chaffanjon PC, Brichon PY, Ranchoup Y, Gressin R, Sotto JJ. Portal vein thrombosis following splenectomy for hematologic disease: prospective study with Doppler color flow imaging. World J Surg. 1998;22:1082–1086. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms