Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012:5:137-43.
doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S31494. Epub 2012 Jun 19.

Active home-based cancer treatment

Sebastiano Bordonaro  1 , Fabio Raiti, Annamaria Di Mari, Calogera Lopiano, Fabrizio Romano, Vitalinda Pumo, Sebastiano Rametta Giuliano, Margherita Iacono, Eleonora Lanteri, Elena Puzzo, Sebastiano Spada, Paolo Tralongo
Affiliations

Active home-based cancer treatment

Sebastiano Bordonaro et al. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2012.

Abstract

Background: Active home-based treatment represents a new model of health care. Chronic treatment requires continuous access to facilities that provide cancer care, with considerable effort, particularly economic, on the part of patients and caregivers. Oral chemotherapy could be limited as a consequence of poor compliance and adherence, especially by elderly patients.

Methods: We selected 30 cancer patients referred to our department and treated with oral therapy (capecitabine, vinorelbine, imatinib, sunitinib, sorafenib, temozolomide, ibandronate). This pilot study of oral therapy in the patient's home was undertaken by a doctor and two nurses with experience in clinical oncology. The instruments used were clinical diaries recording home visits, hospital visits, need for caregiver support, and a questionnaire specially developed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), known as the QLQ-C30 version 2.0, concerning the acceptability of oral treatment from the patient's perspective.

Results: This program decreased the need to access cancer facilities by 98.1%, promoted better quality of life for patients, as reflected in increased EORTC QLQ-C30 scores over time, allowing for greater adherence to oral treatment as a result of control of drug administration outside the hospital. This model has allowed treatment of patients with difficult access to care (elderly, disabled or otherwise needed caregivers) that in the project represent the majority (78% of these).

Conclusions: This model of active home care improves quality of life and adherence with oral therapy, reduces the need to visit the hospital, and consequently decreases the number of lost hours of work on the part of carers. Management of the service by the professionals involved revealed excellent control of the process by nursing staff, with minimal visits involving doctors.

Keywords: cancer; compliance; home-based; quality of life; treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hospital visits avoided.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Variability in quality of life over time.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Palmieri FM, Barton DL. Challenges of oral medications in patients with advanced breast cancer. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2007;23(4 Suppl 2):17–22. - PubMed
    1. Liu G, Franssen E, Fitch MI, et al. Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:110–115. - PubMed
    1. Tsoutsou PG, Belkacemi Y, Gligorov J, et al. Optimal sequence of implied modalities in the adjuvant setting of breast cancer treatment: an update on issues to consider. Oncologist. 2010;15:1169–1178. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Blanke CD, et al. Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:472–480. - PubMed
    1. Welt A, von Minckwitz G, Oberhoff C, et al. Phase I/II study of capecitabine and vinorelbine in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2005;16:64–69. - PubMed