Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul;4(1):97-100.
doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.687. Epub 2012 Apr 19.

Surgical wound management made easier and more cost-effective

Affiliations

Surgical wound management made easier and more cost-effective

Ichiro Akagi et al. Oncol Lett. 2012 Jul.

Abstract

Evidence-based guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) have been published by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). According to these guidelines, a wound should usually be covered with a sterile dressing for 24 to 48 h when a surgical incision is closed primarily. However, it is not recommended that an incision be covered by a dressing beyond 48 h. In this study, patients were stratified into two groups for analysis: patients whose surgical wound was sterilized and whose gauze was changed once daily until postoperative day 7 (7POD; group A); and patients whose surgical wound was sterilized and whose gauze was changed once daily until 2POD (group B). We evaluated the incidence of SSI, nursing hours and cost implications. The results showed that there was no significant difference in SSI occurrence between the two groups (group A, 10% vs. group B, 7.3%). By contrast, the average nursing time differed by 2.8 min (group A, 3.8 min vs. group B, 0.9 min). The material costs per patient were also reduced by $14.70 (group A, $61.80 vs. group B, $47.10). In conclusion, we applied our knowledge of the evidence-based CDC guidelines to determine whether 48-h wound management can be made easier, more uniform and more cost-effective compared to conventional wound management. The results of the present study showed that surgical wound management methods can be more convenient and inexpensive.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The rates of surgical site infection (SSI). There was no significant difference in SSI occurrence (group A, 10%; group B, 7.3%).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The average nursing time for changing the gauze differed by 2.8 min (71.1%)-3.7 min for group A patients compared with 0.9 min for group B patients.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean material costs of surgical wound management per operation.

References

    1. Schultz GS, Sibbald RG, Falanga V, et al. Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management. Wound Repair Regen. 2003;11(Suppl 1):1–28. - PubMed
    1. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control. 1999;27:97–132. Quiz 133–134; Discussion 196. - PubMed
    1. Hollinworth H, Collier M. Nurses’ views about pain and trauma at dressing changes: results of a national survey. J Wound Care. 2000;9:369–373. - PubMed
    1. Hermans MH. Clinical benefit of a hydrocolloid dressing in closed surgical wounds. J ET Nurs. 1993;20:68–72. - PubMed
    1. Thompson GN, Estabrooks CA, Degner LF. Clarifying the concepts in knowledge transfer: a literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2006;53:691–701. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources