Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;29(1):51-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.06.013. Epub 2012 Jul 17.

Resin-based composite performance: are there some things we can't predict?

Jack L Ferracane  1
Affiliations

Resin-based composite performance: are there some things we can't predict?

Jack L Ferracane. Dent Mater. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this manuscript is to address the following questions: Why do direct dental composite restorative materials fail clinically? What tests may be appropriate for predicting clinical performance? Does in vitro testing correlate with clinical performance?

Methods: The literature relating to the clinical and laboratory performance of dental composite restorative materials was reviewed. The main reasons for failure and replacement of dental composite restorations provided the guidance for identifying specific material's properties that were likely to have the greatest impact on clinical outcomes.

Results: There are few examples of studies showing correlation between laboratory tests of physical or mechanical properties and clinical performance of dental composites. Evidence does exist to relate clinical wear to flexure strength, fracture toughness and degree of conversion of the polymer matrix. There is evidence relating marginal breakdown to fracture toughness. Despite the fact that little confirmatory evidence exists, there is the expectation that clinical fracture and wear relates to resistance to fatigue. Only minimal evidence exists to correlate marginal quality and bond strength in the laboratory with clinical performance of bonded dental composites.

Significance: The use of clinical trials to evaluate new dental composite formulations for their performance is expensive and time consuming, and it would be ideal to be able to predict clinical outcomes based on a single or multiple laboratory tests. However, though certain correlations exist, the overall clinical success of dental composites is multi-factorial and therefore is unlikely to be predicted accurately by even a battery of in vitro test methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationship between % Margin Showing Marginal Degradation and Fracture Toughness for Four Dental Composites.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation Matrix for Properties of Experimental Dental Composites vs. Clinical Wear At 1 Year in a Denture Model
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Burke FJT. Amalgam to tooth-coloured materials – implications for clinical practice and dental education: governmental restrictions and amalgam-usage survey results. J Dent. 2004;32:343–350. - PubMed
    1. Bogacki RE, Hunt RJ, del Aguila M, Smith WR. Survival analysis of posterior restorations using an insurance claims database. Oper Dent. 2002;27:488–492. - PubMed
    1. Mjor IA. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand. 1997;55:58–63. - PubMed
    1. Wilson NH, Burke FJ, Mjor IA. Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by a selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom. Quint Int. 1997;28:245–248. - PubMed
    1. Burke FJ, Cheung SW, Mjör IA, Wilson NH. Reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations in vocational training practices. Prim Dent Care. 1999;6:17–20. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources