Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;27(1):133-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2446-6. Epub 2012 Jul 19.

Impact of an enhanced recovery program on short-term outcomes after scheduled laparoscopic colon resection

Nicoleta O Kolozsvari  1 , Giovanni Capretti, Pepa Kaneva, Amy Neville, Franco Carli, Sender Liberman, Patrick Charlebois, Barry Stein, Melina C Vassiliou, Gerald M Fried, Liane S Feldman
Affiliations

Impact of an enhanced recovery program on short-term outcomes after scheduled laparoscopic colon resection

Nicoleta O Kolozsvari et al. Surg Endosc. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: Both enhanced recovery programs (ERP) and laparoscopy can reduce complications and length of stay (LOS) in colon surgery. We investigated whether ERP further improved the short-term outcomes of scheduled laparoscopic colectomies.

Methods: We performed an audit of all patients undergoing scheduled laparoscopic colon resection between January 2003 and August 2010 in our institution. An ERP including accelerated introduction of oral nutrition, mobilization, pain control, and catheter management was introduced in 2005. Demographic data, intra and postoperative details and 30-day ER visit and readmission rate were collected. We compared LOS and short-term outcomes for patients on the program with those receiving traditional postoperative care using Chi-square and regression models. Data are presented as median [25th, 75th percentile]. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

Results: 136 (46%) of 297 eligible patients were enrolled in the ERP. At baseline, the two groups had similar demographic characteristics, but patients in the ERP were more likely to have their operation by a colorectal surgeon (p = 0.01). Patients in the ERP ate solids earlier (p < 0.001) and had earlier removal of their urinary catheter (p < 0.001). LOS was 4 [3, 6] days for both groups (p < 0.01), with more patients in the ERP discharged by POD 3 (p < 0.001). After adjusting for other variables, ERP enrolment remained an independent predictor of LOS (p < 0.01), along with age (p < 0.01) and in-hospital complications (p < 0.001). Complication rates were similar between the two groups. Patients in the ERP had significantly fewer ER visits (p = 0.02), but there were no differences in readmission rates.

Conclusion: In patients undergoing scheduled laparoscopic colectomy in a university-based clinical teaching unit, ERP can further reduce length of stay and postoperative ER visits without increasing readmission rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. World J Surg. 2008 Jun;32(6):971-5 - PubMed
    1. Br J Anaesth. 1997 May;78(5):606-17 - PubMed
    1. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Dec;13(12):2321-9 - PubMed
    1. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009 Oct;24(10):1119-31 - PubMed
    1. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008 Jul-Aug;55(85):1315-9 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources