Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;7(7):e40811.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040811. Epub 2012 Jul 16.

Examining inequities in incidence of catastrophic health expenditures on different healthcare services and health facilities in Nigeria

Affiliations

Examining inequities in incidence of catastrophic health expenditures on different healthcare services and health facilities in Nigeria

Obinna Onwujekwe et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

Objective: There is limited evidence about levels of socio-economic and other differences in catastrophic health spending in Nigeria and in many sub-Saharan African countries. The study estimated the level of catastrophic healthcare expenditures for different healthcare services and facilities and their distribution across socioeconomic status (SES) groups.

Methods: The study took place in four Local Government Areas in southeast Nigeria. Data were collected using interviewer-administered questionnaires administered to 4873 households. Catastrophic health expenditures (CHE) were measured using a threshold of 40% of monthly non-food expenditure. We examined both total monthly health expenditure and disaggregated expenditure by source and type of care.

Results: The average total household health expenditure per month was 2354 Naira ($19.6). For outpatient services, average monthly expenditure was 1809 Naira ($15.1), whilst for inpatient services it was 610 Naira ($5.1). Higher health expenditures were incurred by urban residents and the better-off SES groups. Overall, 27% of households incurred CHE, higher for poorer socioeconomic groups and for rural residents. Only 1.0% of households had a member that was enrolled in a health insurance scheme.

Conclusion: The worse-off households (the poorest SES and rural dwellers) experienced the highest burden of health expenditure. There was almost a complete lack of financial risk protection. Health reform mechanisms are needed to ensure universal coverage with financial risk protection mechanisms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Ichoku HE, Fonta W. The distributive effect of health care financing in Nigeria. PEP Working Paper, No 2006–17. Canada: University of Laval. 2006.
    1. Lagarde M, Palmer N. The impact of user fees on health service utilization in low and middle income countries: how strong is the evidence. Bulletin of World Health Organization. 2008;86(11):839–848. - PMC - PubMed
    1. African Health Economics and Policy Association (AFHEA) Key issues from the 2011 AfHEA conference: Toward universal health coverage in Africa. Senegal:AfHEA. 2011. - PubMed
    1. Uzochukwu BSC, Onwujekwe OE, Akpala CO. Effect of the Bamako-Initiative drug revolving fund on availability and rational use of essential drugs in primary health care facilities in south-east Nigeria. Health Policy and Planning. 2002;17(4):378–383. - PubMed
    1. Ogunbekun I, Adeyi O, Wouters A, Morrow RH. Costs and financing of improvements in the quality of maternal health services through the Bamako initiative in Nigeria. Health Policy and Planning. 1996;11:369–84. - PubMed

Publication types