Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul 20:13:17.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-17.

Ethical and legal constraints to children's participation in research in Zimbabwe: experiences from the multicenter pediatric HIV ARROW trial

Mutsa Bwakura-Dangarembizi  1 , Rosemary Musesengwa, Kusum J Nathoo, Patrick Takaidza, Tawanda Mhute, Tichaona Vhembo
Affiliations

Ethical and legal constraints to children's participation in research in Zimbabwe: experiences from the multicenter pediatric HIV ARROW trial

Mutsa Bwakura-Dangarembizi et al. BMC Med Ethics. .

Abstract

Background: Clinical trials involving children previously considered unethical are now considered essential because of the inherent physiological differences between children and adults. An integral part of research ethics is the informed consent, which for children is obtained by proxy from a consenting parent or guardian. The informed consent process is governed by international ethical codes that are interpreted in accordance with local laws and procedures raising the importance of contextualizing their implementation.

Findings: In Zimbabwe the parental informed consent document for children participating in clinical research is modeled after Western laws of ethics and requires that the parent or legally authorized representative provide consent on behalf of a minor. This article highlights the experiences and lessons learnt by Zimbabwean researchers in obtaining informed consent from guardians of orphaned children participating in a collaborative HIV clinical trial involving the Medical Research Council, United Kingdom and four centers, three of which are in Uganda. Researchers were faced with a situation where caregivers of orphaned children were not permitted to provide informed consent for trial participation. The situation contrasted with general clinical practice where consent for procedures on orphans is obtained from their caregivers who are not legal guardians.

Conclusion: The challenges faced in obtaining informed consent for orphans in this clinical trial underscores the need for the Zimbabwe ethics committee to develop an ethical and legal framework for pediatric research that is based on international guidelines while taking into account the cultural context. The Medical Research Council of Zimbabwe has since started the process that is expected to involve critical stakeholders namely the community including children, ethicists, the legal fraternity and researchers.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. CIOMS. International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva. 2002. - PubMed
    1. Diekema DS. Conducting ethical research in Pediatrics: A brief historical overview and review of Pediatric regulations. J Pediatr. 2006;149:S3–S11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.04.043. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caldwell PH, Murphy SB, Butow PN, Craig JC. Clinical Trials in Children. Lancet. 2004;364:803–811. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16942-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. The Code of Federal Regulations and ICH Guidelines. 2006.
    1. MRC Ethics Guide. Medical Research Involving Children. 2004.

Publication types

Substances