Risk of locoregional recurrence in patients with false-negative frozen section or close margins of retroareolar specimen in nipple-sparing mastectomy
- PMID: 22820937
- DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2514-0
Risk of locoregional recurrence in patients with false-negative frozen section or close margins of retroareolar specimen in nipple-sparing mastectomy
Abstract
Background: Our purpose was to evaluate the locoregional recurrence (LRR) of patients with false-negative, frozen-section or close margins of retroareolar specimen in nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) procedure.
Methods: From 2002-2008, we recruited patients who had atypia or presence of cancer cells in definitive histology of retroareolar tissue despite of absence of tumor cell in intraoperative retroareolar frozen section. We also included the close margin cases defined as the presence of tumor cells at the first frozen section, but after deeper core out of retroareolar tissue were revealed free of malignancy. The incidence of LRR and NAC recurrence were reported, and the factors associated were analyzed.
Results: Of 948 NSM procedures, there were 88 false-negative, frozen-sections and 10 close margin cases. The 5-year cumulative incidence of LRR and NAC recurrence was 11.2 % (10/98 patients) and 2.4 % (2/98 patients), respectively. Analyzing the definitive results of retroareolar tissue, the 5-year cumulative incidence of LRR was 42.9 % (n = 4) for atypia, 10 % (n = 2) for lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), 10 % (n = 1) for close margins, 8.7 % (n = 3) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and 0 % for invasive carcinoma. In situ carcinoma as a primary tumor was a significant predictor of NAC recurrence (P < 0.01).
Conclusions: Despite a high reliability of frozen section, there is still a minority of false-negative results. Nevertheless, the LRR is considerably low. This fact suggests the possibility of preservation of the NAC after discussion with the patient.
Similar articles
-
Nipple-sparing mastectomy in association with intra operative radiotherapy (ELIOT): A new type of mastectomy for breast cancer treatment.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006 Mar;96(1):47-51. doi: 10.1007/s10549-005-9033-7. Epub 2005 Oct 27. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006. PMID: 16261402
-
Do clinicopathological features of the cancer patient relate with nipple areolar complex necrosis in nipple-sparing mastectomy?Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Mar;20(3):990-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2677-8. Epub 2012 Oct 16. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23070785
-
Feasibility of breast-conserving surgery for patients with breast carcinoma associated with nipple discharge.Cancer. 2004 Aug 1;101(3):508-17. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20394. Cancer. 2004. PMID: 15274063
-
Tumor-to-nipple Distance Should Not Preclude Nipple-sparing Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients. Personal Experience and Literature Review.Anticancer Res. 2020 Jun;40(6):3543-3550. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14343. Anticancer Res. 2020. PMID: 32487656 Review.
-
Oncological and aesthetic considerations of skin-sparing mastectomy.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Oct;111(3):391-403. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9801-7. Epub 2007 Oct 28. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008. PMID: 17965954 Review.
Cited by
-
A Novel Approach to the Management of Margin-positive DCIS in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014 Dec 5;2(11):e253. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000189. eCollection 2014 Nov. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014. PMID: 25506536 Free PMC article.
-
Radiotherapy after skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction in intermediate-risk breast cancer : Indication and technical considerations.Strahlenther Onkol. 2019 Nov;195(11):949-963. doi: 10.1007/s00066-019-01507-9. Epub 2019 Aug 26. Strahlenther Onkol. 2019. PMID: 31451835 Review. English.
-
Intraoperative Examination of Retro-Areolar Margin is not Routinely Necessary During Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Cancer.Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;30(11):6488-6496. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13726-7. Epub 2023 Jun 30. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37391672
-
Nipple Preservation in Breast Cancer Associated with Nipple Discharge.World J Surg. 2017 Jan;41(1):176-183. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3679-7. World J Surg. 2017. PMID: 27501708
-
Clinical value of delayed 18F-FDG PET/CT for predicting nipple-areolar complex involvement in breast cancer: A comparison with clinical symptoms and breast MRI.PLoS One. 2018 Sep 12;13(9):e0203649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203649. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30208098 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical