Effects of stimulus duration on audio-visual synchrony perception
- PMID: 22821079
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3182-9
Effects of stimulus duration on audio-visual synchrony perception
Abstract
The integration of visual and auditory inputs in the human brain occurs only if the components are perceived in temporal proximity, that is, when the intermodal time difference falls within the so-called subjective synchrony range. We used the midpoint of this range to estimate the point of subjective simultaneity (PSS). We measured the PSS for audio-visual (AV) stimuli in a synchrony judgment task, in which subjects had to judge a given AV stimulus using three response categories (audio first, synchronous, video first). The relevant stimulus manipulation was the duration of the auditory and visual components. Results for unimodal auditory and visual stimuli have shown that the perceived onset shifts to relatively later positions with increasing stimulus duration. These unimodal shifts should be reflected in changing PSS values, when AV stimuli with different durations of the auditory and visual components are used. The results for 17 subjects showed indeed a significant shift of the PSS for different duration combinations of the stimulus components. Because the shifts were approximately equal for duration changes in either of the components, no net shift of the PSS was observed as long as the durations of the two components were equal. This result indicates the need to appropriately account for unimodal timing effects when quantifying intermodal synchrony perception.
Similar articles
-
Visual field differences in temporal synchrony processing for audio-visual stimuli.PLoS One. 2021 Dec 16;16(12):e0261129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261129. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34914735 Free PMC article.
-
Good times for multisensory integration: Effects of the precision of temporal synchrony as revealed by gamma-band oscillations.Neuropsychologia. 2007 Feb 1;45(3):561-71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.013. Epub 2006 Mar 20. Neuropsychologia. 2007. PMID: 16542688
-
Recalibration of temporal order perception by exposure to audio-visual asynchrony.Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Dec;22(1):32-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.07.003. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004. PMID: 15561498
-
On the discrepant results in synchrony judgment and temporal-order judgment tasks: a quantitative model.Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Oct;19(5):820-46. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0278-y. Psychon Bull Rev. 2012. PMID: 22829342 Review.
-
Audiotactile interactions in temporal perception.Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Jun;18(3):429-54. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0070-4. Psychon Bull Rev. 2011. PMID: 21400125 Review.
Cited by
-
The construct of the multisensory temporal binding window and its dysregulation in developmental disabilities.Neuropsychologia. 2014 Nov;64:105-23. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Aug 13. Neuropsychologia. 2014. PMID: 25128432 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Thresholds of auditory-motor coupling measured with a simple task in musicians and non-musicians: was the sound simultaneous to the key press?PLoS One. 2014 Feb 3;9(2):e87176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087176. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24498299 Free PMC article.
-
Multisensory temporal integration: task and stimulus dependencies.Exp Brain Res. 2013 Jun;227(2):249-61. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3507-3. Epub 2013 Apr 21. Exp Brain Res. 2013. PMID: 23604624 Free PMC article.
-
Lower multisensory temporal acuity in individuals with high schizotypal traits: a web-based study.Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 17;12(1):2782. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06503-1. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35177673 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Stimulus duration has little effect on auditory, visual and audiovisual temporal order judgement.Exp Brain Res. 2018 May;236(5):1273-1282. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5218-2. Epub 2018 Feb 26. Exp Brain Res. 2018. PMID: 29484457
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources