Analytical and experimental position stability of the abutment in different dental implant systems with a conical implant-abutment connection
- PMID: 22821447
- PMCID: PMC3607726
- DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0786-1
Analytical and experimental position stability of the abutment in different dental implant systems with a conical implant-abutment connection
Abstract
Objectives: Position stability of the abutment should be investigated in four implant systems with a conical implant-abutment connection.
Materials and methods: Previously developed formulas and an established experimental setup were used to determine the position stability of the abutment in the four implant systems with a conical implant-abutment connection and different positional index designs: The theoretical rotational freedom was calculated by using the dimensions of one randomly selected implant per system for approximated geometric models. Experimentally, the rotation, the vertical displacement, and canting moments of the abutment after multiple repositioning and hand tightening of the abutment screw were investigated.
Results: The experimental rotation and vertical displacement differed between the implant systems tested. The analytical and experimental results for the rotation of the abutment clearly deviated in the three implant systems.
Conclusions: Malpositioning of the abutment was possible in all the implant systems tested. Deviating theoretical and experimental results suggest high manufacturing tolerances during fabrication of the implant components.
Clinical relevance: Position stability of the abutment is essential for precisely fitting implant-supported superstructures.
Figures

Similar articles
-
The Influence of Torque Tightening on the Position Stability of the Abutment in Conical Implant-Abutment Connections.Int J Prosthodont. 2015 Sep-Oct;28(5):538-41. doi: 10.11607/ijp.3853. Int J Prosthodont. 2015. PMID: 26340017
-
Abutment rotational freedom on five implant systems with different internal connections.J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Mar;129(3):433-439. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.04.027. Epub 2021 Jul 5. J Prosthet Dent. 2023. PMID: 34238536
-
Theoretical optimum of implant positional index design.J Dent Res. 2009 Aug;88(8):731-5. doi: 10.1177/0022034509341243. J Dent Res. 2009. PMID: 19734460
-
Mechanism of and factors associated with the loosening of the implant abutment screw: A review.J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 Jul;31(4):338-345. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12494. Epub 2019 May 31. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019. PMID: 31150572 Review.
-
[Current status of implant-abutment--part 1: abutments for cemented versus screw retained restorations].Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993). 2012 Jan;29(1):19-25, 63. Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993). 2012. PMID: 22991873 Review. Hebrew.
Cited by
-
Reverse torque evaluation in indexed and nonindexed abutments of Morse Taper implants in a mechanical fatigue test.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019 Mar-Apr;16(2):110-116. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019. PMID: 30820205 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of tightening torque on the marginal adaptation of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015 Jul-Aug;12(4):359-64. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.161458. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015. PMID: 26288627 Free PMC article.
-
A comparative biomechanical study of original and compatible titanium bases: evaluation of screw loosening and 3D-crown displacement following cyclic loading analysis.J Adv Prosthodont. 2022 Apr;14(2):70-77. doi: 10.4047/jap.2022.14.2.70. Epub 2022 Apr 27. J Adv Prosthodont. 2022. PMID: 35601348 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of the connection design and titanium grades of the implant complex on resistance under static loading.J Adv Prosthodont. 2016 Oct;8(5):388-395. doi: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.388. Epub 2016 Oct 21. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016. PMID: 27826389 Free PMC article.
-
Efficiency of occlusal and interproximal adjustments in CAD-CAM manufactured single implant crowns - cast-free vs 3D printed cast-based.J Adv Prosthodont. 2021 Dec;13(6):351-360. doi: 10.4047/jap.2021.13.6.351. Epub 2021 Dec 22. J Adv Prosthodont. 2021. PMID: 35003551 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bozini T, Petridis H, Garefis K, Garefis P. A meta-analysis of prosthodontic complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in edentulous patients after an observation period of at least 5years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26:304–318. - PubMed
-
- Davis DM, Packer ME, Watson RM. Maintenance requirements of implant-supported fixed prostheses opposed by implant-supported fixed prostheses, natural teeth, or complete dentures: a 5-year retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16:521–523. - PubMed
-
- Nedir R, Bischof M, Szmukler-Moncler S, Belser UC, Samson J. Prosthetic complications with dental implants: from an up-to-8-year experience in private practice. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:919–928. - PubMed
-
- Stimmelmayr M, Erdelt K, Güth JF, Happe A, Beuer F (2011) Evaluation of impression accuracy for a four-implant mandibular model—a digital approach. Clin Oral Investig Oct 19. doi:10.1007/s00784-011-0622-z - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources