Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr;17(3):1017-23.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0786-1. Epub 2012 Jul 22.

Analytical and experimental position stability of the abutment in different dental implant systems with a conical implant-abutment connection

Affiliations

Analytical and experimental position stability of the abutment in different dental implant systems with a conical implant-abutment connection

Wiebke Semper-Hogg et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: Position stability of the abutment should be investigated in four implant systems with a conical implant-abutment connection.

Materials and methods: Previously developed formulas and an established experimental setup were used to determine the position stability of the abutment in the four implant systems with a conical implant-abutment connection and different positional index designs: The theoretical rotational freedom was calculated by using the dimensions of one randomly selected implant per system for approximated geometric models. Experimentally, the rotation, the vertical displacement, and canting moments of the abutment after multiple repositioning and hand tightening of the abutment screw were investigated.

Results: The experimental rotation and vertical displacement differed between the implant systems tested. The analytical and experimental results for the rotation of the abutment clearly deviated in the three implant systems.

Conclusions: Malpositioning of the abutment was possible in all the implant systems tested. Deviating theoretical and experimental results suggest high manufacturing tolerances during fabrication of the implant components.

Clinical relevance: Position stability of the abutment is essential for precisely fitting implant-supported superstructures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Abutments showing the positional index designs. a S1: Nobel Active. Conical implant–abutment connection with a cone angle of 12° and an internal hexagonal positional index. b S2: Bone Level. Conical implant–abutment connection with a cone angle of 15° and cams and grooves. c S3: Ankylos C/X. Conical implant–abutment connection with a cone angle of 5.7° and six cams and grooves. d S4: Conelog. Conical implant–abutment connection with a cone angle of 7.5°and three cams and grooves

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90:121–132. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00212-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bozini T, Petridis H, Garefis K, Garefis P. A meta-analysis of prosthodontic complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in edentulous patients after an observation period of at least 5years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26:304–318. - PubMed
    1. Davis DM, Packer ME, Watson RM. Maintenance requirements of implant-supported fixed prostheses opposed by implant-supported fixed prostheses, natural teeth, or complete dentures: a 5-year retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16:521–523. - PubMed
    1. Nedir R, Bischof M, Szmukler-Moncler S, Belser UC, Samson J. Prosthetic complications with dental implants: from an up-to-8-year experience in private practice. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:919–928. - PubMed
    1. Stimmelmayr M, Erdelt K, Güth JF, Happe A, Beuer F (2011) Evaluation of impression accuracy for a four-implant mandibular model—a digital approach. Clin Oral Investig Oct 19. doi:10.1007/s00784-011-0622-z - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources