Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb;54(2):216-24.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02589.x. Epub 2012 Jul 24.

Factors influencing scores on the social responsiveness scale

Vanessa Hus  1 , Somer Bishop, Katherine Gotham, Marisela Huerta, Catherine Lord
Affiliations

Factors influencing scores on the social responsiveness scale

Vanessa Hus et al. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

Background: The Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) is a parent-completed screening questionnaire often used to measure autism spectrum disorders (ASD) severity. Although child characteristics are known to influence scores from other ASD-symptom measures, as well as parent-questionnaires more broadly, there has been limited consideration of how non-ASD-specific factors may affect interpretation of SRS scores. Previous studies have explored effects of behavior problems on SRS specificity, but have not addressed influences on the use of the SRS as a quantitative measure of ASD-symptoms.

Method: Raw scores (SRS-Raw) from parent-completed SRS were analyzed for 2,368 probands with ASD and 1,913 unaffected siblings. Regression analyses were used to assess associations between SRS scores and demographic, language, cognitive, and behavior measures.

Results: For probands, higher SRS-Raw were associated with greater non-ASD behavior problems, higher age, and more impaired language and cognitive skills, as well as scores from other parent report measures of social development and ASD-symptoms. For unaffected siblings, having more behavior problems predicted higher SRS-Raw; male gender, younger age, and poorer adaptive social and expressive communication skills also showed small, but significant effects.

Conclusions: When using the SRS as a quantitative phenotype measure, the influence of behavior problems, age, and expressive language or cognitive level on scores must be considered. If effects of non-ASD-specific factors are not addressed, SRS scores are more appropriately interpreted as indicating general levels of impairment, than as severity of ASD-specific symptoms or social impairment. Additional research is needed to consider how these factors influence the SRS' sensitivity and specificity in large, clinical samples including individuals with disorders other than ASD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Statement: CL receives royalties for the ADI-R and ADOS; profits from this study were donated to charity.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
SRS-Raw and SRS-Residual by Vineland-Social and CBCL Groups
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Achenbach TM, Rescorla L. Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. Burlington, VT: ASEBA; 2001.
    1. Aylward GP. Developmental Screening and Assessment: What Are We Thinking? Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics. 2009;30(2):169–173. - PubMed
    1. Bölte S, Poustka F, Constantino JN. Assessing autistic traits: Cross-cultural validation of the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) Autism Research. 2008;1(6):354–363. - PubMed
    1. Charman T, Baird G, Simonoff E, Loucas T, Chandler S, Meldrum D, et al. Efficacy of three screening instruments in the identification of autistic-spectrum disorders. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2007;191(6):554–559. - PubMed
    1. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Psychology Press; 1988.

Publication types