Bioequivalence requirements in the European Union: critical discussion
- PMID: 22826032
- PMCID: PMC3475855
- DOI: 10.1208/s12248-012-9382-1
Bioequivalence requirements in the European Union: critical discussion
Abstract
The aim of the present paper is to summarize the revised European Union (EU) Guideline on the Investigation of Bioequivalence and to discuss critically with respect to previous European requirements and present US Food and Drug Administration guidelines its more relevant novelties such as the following: in order to facilitate the development of generic medicinal products, the EU guideline includes the eligibility for Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS)-based biowaivers not only for BCS class I drugs but also for class III drugs with tighter requirements for dissolution and excipient composition. The permeability criterion of BCS classification has been substituted with human absorbability, as per the Biopharmaceutical Drug Disposition Classification System. The widening of the acceptance range for C (max) is possible only for highly variable reference products with an additional clinical justification. This scaled widening is carried out with a proportionality constant of 0.760 which is more conservative than the FDA approach and maintains the consumer risk at a 5% level when the intra-subject CV is close to 30%, due to the smooth transition between the scaled and the constant criteria. The guideline allows for the possibility of two-stage designs to obtain the necessary information on formulation differences and variability from interim analyses as a part of the pivotal bioequivalence study, instead of undertaking pilot studies. The guideline also specifies that the statistical analyses should be performed considering all factors as fixed, which has implications in the case of replicate designs.
Similar articles
-
Summary workshop report: bioequivalence, biopharmaceutics classification system, and beyond.AAPS J. 2008 Jun;10(2):373-9. doi: 10.1208/s12248-008-9040-9. Epub 2008 Aug 5. AAPS J. 2008. PMID: 18679807 Free PMC article.
-
BCS Biowaivers: Similarities and Differences Among EMA, FDA, and WHO Requirements.AAPS J. 2016 May;18(3):612-8. doi: 10.1208/s12248-016-9877-2. Epub 2016 Mar 4. AAPS J. 2016. PMID: 26943914 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Classification of torasemide based on the Biopharmaceutics Classification System and evaluation of the FDA biowaiver provision for generic products of CLASS I drugs.J Pharm Pharmacol. 2006 Nov;58(11):1475-82. doi: 10.1211/jpp.58.11.0008. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2006. PMID: 17132210 Clinical Trial.
-
The revised EMA guideline for the investigation of bioequivalence for immediate release oral formulations with systemic action.J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2012;15(3):376-88. doi: 10.18433/j3vc8j. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2012. PMID: 23148877
-
Evaluation of Excipient Risk in BCS Class I and III Biowaivers.AAPS J. 2022 Jan 5;24(1):20. doi: 10.1208/s12248-021-00670-1. AAPS J. 2022. PMID: 34988701 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Between-Batch Bioequivalence (BBE): a Statistical Test to Evaluate In Vitro Bioequivalence Considering the Between-Batch Variability.AAPS J. 2020 Sep 10;22(5):119. doi: 10.1208/s12248-020-00486-5. AAPS J. 2020. PMID: 32910283 Free PMC article.
-
Equivalence and interchangeability of narrow therapeutic index drugs in organ transplantation.Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2013 Oct;20(5):302-307. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2012-000258. Epub 2013 Aug 29. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2013. PMID: 24089632 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Two-stage designs in bioequivalence trials.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Mar;71(3):271-81. doi: 10.1007/s00228-015-1806-2. Epub 2015 Jan 22. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015. PMID: 25604509 Review.
-
Segmental-Dependent Solubility and Permeability as Key Factors Guiding Controlled Release Drug Product Development.Pharmaceutics. 2020 Mar 24;12(3):295. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12030295. Pharmaceutics. 2020. PMID: 32214015 Free PMC article.
-
Statistical comparison of dissolution profiles to predict the bioequivalence of extended release formulations.AAPS J. 2014 Jul;16(4):791-801. doi: 10.1208/s12248-014-9615-6. Epub 2014 May 23. AAPS J. 2014. PMID: 24854895 Free PMC article.
References
-
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Guidance for Industry. Bioavailability and Bioequivalence. Studies for Orally Adminsitered Drug Products-General Considerations. 2003.
-
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Guidance for Industry. Extended Release Oral Dosage Forms: Development, Evaluation, and Application of In Vitro/In Vivo Correlations. 1997.
-
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Guidance for Industry. Waiver of In Vivo Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms Based on a Biopharmaceutics Classification System. 2000.
-
- National Institute of Health Sciences, Japan. Guideline for Bioequivalence Studies for Generic Products. 22 Dec 1997.
-
- Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Guideline on the Investigation of Bioequivalence. 20 Jan 2010. London, European Medicines Agency (EMA).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical