Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul 24:12:113.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-113.

Genetic structure and mating system of wild cowpea populations in West Africa

Affiliations

Genetic structure and mating system of wild cowpea populations in West Africa

Eric B Kouam et al. BMC Plant Biol. .

Abstract

Background: Cowpea is a highly inbred crop. It is part of a crop-weed complex, whose origin and dynamics is unknown, which is distributed across the African continent. This study examined outcrossing rates and genetic structures in 35 wild cowpea (Vigna unguiculata ssp. unguiculata var. spontanea) populations from West Africa, using 21 isozyme loci, 9 of them showing polymorphism.

Results: Outcrossing rates ranged from 1% to 9.5% (mean 3.4%), which classifies the wild cowpea breeding system as primarily selfing, though rare outcrossing events were detected in each population studied. Furthermore, the analyses of both the genetic structure of populations and the relationships between the wild and domesticated groups suggest possibilities of gene flow that are corroborated by field observations.

Conclusions: As expected in a predominantly inbred breeding system, wild cowpea shows high levels of genetic differentiation and low levels of genetic diversity within populations. Gene flow from domesticated to wild cowpea does occur, although the lack of strong genetic swamping and modified seed morphology in the wild populations suggest that these introgressions should be rare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Geographical locations of the 35 sampling sites reported in Table1. All locations correspond to wild cowpea populations, excepted BEN05, BUR03, GHA26, NIG04, NIG10, NIG12, and NIG13 where wild and domesticated populations were sampled.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pattern of isolation by distance. Pattern of isolation by distance in the wild populations. Correlogram plot of the genetic autocorrelation coefficient as a function of the geographical distance classes; dotted lines define the 95%-confidence interval based on 999 permutations.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Principal coordinate analysis. PCO (Principal coordinate) map (Axes 1 and 2) of the sampled populations based on their genetic distances. White dots correspond to domesticated populations; black dots, wild populations. The two first axes accounted for 73.6% of the total variation (43.2% and 30.4% for axis 1 and axis 2, respectively).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Autocorrelation analysis. Autocorrelation analysis of wild-domesticated pairs of populations (rW-D) performed on asymmetrical distance matrices. Plot of the genetic autocorrelation coefficient as a function of the geographical distance classes; dotted lines define the 95%-confidence interval based on 999 permutations.

References

    1. Ellstrand NC. Current knowledge of gene flow in plants: implications for transgene flow. Philos Trans R Soc B. 2003;358:1163–1170. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1299. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frankham R. Balloo JD, Briscoe DA: Introduction to Conservation Genetics. University press, Cambridge; 2002.
    1. Hajjar R, Hodgkin T. The use of wild relatives in crop improvement: a survey of developments over the last 20 years. Euphytica. 2007;156:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s10681-007-9363-0. - DOI
    1. Heywood V, Casas A, Ford-Lloyd B, Kell S, Maxted N. Conservation and sustainable use of crop wild relatives. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2007;121:245–255. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.014. - DOI
    1. De Wet JMJ, Harlan JR. Weeds and domesticates: evolution in a man-made habitat. Econ Bot. 1975;29:99–107. doi: 10.1007/BF02863309. - DOI

Publication types