That the effects of smoking should be measured in pack-years: misconceptions 4
- PMID: 22828655
- PMCID: PMC3405232
- DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.97
That the effects of smoking should be measured in pack-years: misconceptions 4
Abstract
Lung cancer incidence in smokers is roughly proportional to dose rate (cigarettes per day) but increases much more rapidly with duration of smoking. The assumption that the incidence rate is proportional to total lifetime dose (the product of dose rate and duration) has been known to be wrong for many years, but total dose in pack-years is still often included, either alone or together, with more fundamental parameters such as dose rate, in regression analysis of epidemiological data. This is mathematically unnecessary and scientifically unhelpful.
© 2012 Cancer Research UK
Comment in
-
Reply: misunderstandings in the misconception on the use of pack-years in analysis of smoking.Br J Cancer. 2013 Mar 19;108(5):1221. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.77. Epub 2013 Feb 28. Br J Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23449356 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Misunderstandings in the misconception on the use of pack-years in analysis of smoking.Br J Cancer. 2013 Mar 19;108(5):1218-20. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.76. Epub 2013 Feb 28. Br J Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23449359 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Darby SC, Doll R (1990) Radiation and exposure rate. Nature 344: 824. - PubMed
-
- Doll R (1978) An epidemiological perspective of the biology of cancer. Cancer Res 38: 3573–3583 - PubMed
-
- Lubin JH, Caporaso N, Wichmann HE, Schaffrath-Rosario A, Alavanja MC (2007) Cigarette smoking and lung cancer: modeling effect modification of total exposure and intensity. Epidemiology 18: 639–648 - PubMed
-
- Moolgavkar SH, Dewanji A, Luebeck G (1989) Cigarette smoking and lung cancer: reanalysis of the British doctors’ data. J Natl Cancer Inst 81: 415–420 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
