Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Jan;28(1):25-31.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2164-8. Epub 2012 Jul 25.

Impact of information leaflets on behavior of patients with gastroenteritis or tonsillitis: a cluster randomized trial in French primary care

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Impact of information leaflets on behavior of patients with gastroenteritis or tonsillitis: a cluster randomized trial in French primary care

Mélanie Sustersic et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the impact of four patient information leaflets on patients' behavior in primary care.

Design: Cluster randomized multicenter controlled trial between November 2009 and January 2011.

Participants: French adults and children consulting a participating primary care physician and diagnosed with gastroenteritis or tonsillitis. Patients were randomized to receive patient information leaflets or not, according to the cluster randomization of their primary care physician.

Intervention: Adult patients or adults accompanying a child diagnosed with gastroenteritis or tonsillitis were informed of the study. Physicians in the intervention group gave patients an information leaflet about their condition. Two weeks after the consultation patients (or their accompanying adult) answered a telephone questionnaire on their behavior and knowledge about the condition.

Main measures: The main and secondary outcomes, mean behavior and knowledge scores respectively, were calculated from the replies to this questionnaire.

Results: Twenty-four physicians included 400 patients. Twelve patients were lost to follow-up (3 %). In the group that received the patient information leaflet, patient behavior was closer to that recommended by the guidelines than in the control group (mean behavior score 4.9 versus 4.2, p < 0.01). Knowledge was better for adults receiving the leaflet than in the control group (mean knowledge score 4.2 versus 3.6, p < 0.01). There were fewer visits for the same symptoms by household members of patients given leaflets (23.4 % vs. 56.2 %, p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Patient information leaflets given by the physician during the consultation significantly modify the patient's behavior and knowledge of the disease, compared with patients not receiving the leaflets, for the conditions studied.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow-diagram for the Patient Information Leaflet study. The coordinating centre was informed by fax of three eligible patients who declined to participate in the control group. PIL: Patient Information Leaflet. *Patients lost to follow-up were those who could not be contacted by telephone after 4 attempts.

References

    1. Dunkelman H. Patients’ knowledge of their condition and treatment: how it might be improved. BMJ. 1979;2(6185):311–314. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6185.311. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shank JC, Murphy M, Schulte-Mowry L. Patient preferences regarding educational pamphlets in the family practice center. Fam Med. 1991;23(6):429–432. - PubMed
    1. Ziegler DK, Mosier MC, Buenaver M, Okuyemi K. How much information about adverse effects of medication do patients want from physicians? Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(5):706–713. doi: 10.1001/archinte.161.5.706. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nair K, Dolovich L, Cassels A, et al. What patients want to know about their medications. Focus group study of patient and clinician perspectives. Can Fam Physician. 2002;48:104–110. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kenny T, Wilson RG, Purves IN, et al. A PIL for every ill? Patient information leaflets (PILs): a review of past, present and future use. Fam Pract. 1998;15(5):471–479. doi: 10.1093/fampra/15.5.471. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms