Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul 25:12:10.
doi: 10.1186/1471-5945-12-10.

Budget impact analysis of ustekinumab in the management of moderate to severe psoriasis in Greece

Affiliations

Budget impact analysis of ustekinumab in the management of moderate to severe psoriasis in Greece

Georgia Avgerinou et al. BMC Dermatol. .

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to estimate the annual and per-patient budget impact of the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis in Greece before and after the introduction of ustekinumab.

Methods: A budget impact model was constructed from a national health system perspective to depict the clinical and economic aspects of psoriasis treatment over 5 years. The model included drug acquisition, monitoring, and administration costs for both the induction and maintenance years for patients in a treatment mix with etanercept, adalimumab, infliximab, with or without ustekinumab. It also considered the resource utilization for non-responders. Greek treatment patterns and resource utilization data were derived from 110 interviews with dermatologists conducted in February 2009 and evaluated by an expert panel of 18 key opinion leaders. Officially published sources were used to derive the unit costs. Costs of adverse events and indirect costs were excluded from the analysis. Treatment response was defined as the probability of achieving a PASI 50, PASI 75, or PASI 90 response, based on published clinical trial data.

Results: The inclusion of ustekinumab in the biological treatment mix for moderate to severe psoriasis is predicted to lead to total per-patient savings of €443 and €900 in years 1 and 5 of its introduction, respectively. The cost savings were attributed to reduced administration costs, reduced hospitalizations for non-responders, and improved efficacy. These results were mainly driven by the low number of administrations required with ustekinumab over a 5 year treatment period (22 for ustekinumab, compared with 272 for etanercept, 131 for adalimumab, and 36 for infliximab).

Conclusions: The inclusion of ustekinumab in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis in Greece is anticipated to have short- and long-term health and economic benefits, both on an annual and per-patient basis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Net budget impact of ustekinumab (annual cost savings per patient in €).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Woolacott N, Hawkins N, Mason A, Kainth A, Khadjesari Z, Vergel YB. et al.Etanercept and efalizumab for the treatment of psoriasis: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2006;10:No 46. - PubMed
    1. Lebwohl M. Psoriasis. Lancet. 2003;361:1197–1204. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12954-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kyriakis KP, Palamaras I, Pagana G, Terzoudi S, Evangelou G. Lifetime prevalence fluctuations of chronic plaque psoriasis and other non-pustular clinical variants. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008;22:1513–1514. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2008.02692.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stern RS. Psoriasis. Lancet. 1997;350:349–353. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)05257-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Psoriasis Foundation. The psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis pocket guide -Treatment algorithms and management options. , Portland; 2009.

MeSH terms