Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul 25:13:71.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-71.

Experiences of care planning in England: interviews with patients with long term conditions

Affiliations

Experiences of care planning in England: interviews with patients with long term conditions

Jenny Newbould et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: The prevalence and impact of long term conditions continues to rise. Care planning for people with long term conditions has been a policy priority in England for chronic disease management. However, it is not clear how care planning is currently understood, translated and implemented in primary care. This study explores experience of care planning in patients with long term conditions in three areas in England.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 23 predominantly elderly patients with multiple long term conditions. The interviews were designed to explore variations in and emergent experiences of care planning. Qualitative analysis of interview transcripts involved reflexively coding and re-coding data into categories and themes.

Results: No participants reported experiencing explicit care planning discussions or receiving written documentation setting out a negotiated care plan and they were unfamiliar with the term 'care planning'. However, most described some components of care planning which occurred over a number of contacts with health care professionals which we term "reactive" care planning. Here, key elements of care planning including goal setting and action planning were rare. Additionally, poor continuity and coordination of care, lack of time in consultations, and patient concerns about what was legitimate to discuss with the doctor were described.

Conclusions: Amongst this population, elements of care planning were present in their accounts, but a structured, comprehensive process and consequent written record (as outlined in English Department of Health policy) was not evident. Further research needs to explore the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches to care planning for different patient groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The care planning process as envisaged by English Department of Health policy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
“Reactive” care planning as experienced by study participants.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO. A vital investment. WHO; 2005. Preventing Chronic Diseases.
    1. Wolff JL, Starfield B, Anderson G. Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(20):2269–2276. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.20.2269. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van den Akker M, Buntinx F, Metsemakers JF, Roos S, Knottnerus JA. Multimorbidity in general practice: prevalence, incidence, and determinants of co-occurring chronic and recurrent diseases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(5):367–375. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00306-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sobel DS. Rethinking medicine: improving health outcomes with cost-effective psychosocial interventions. Psychosom Med. 1995;57(3):234–244. - PubMed
    1. Nolte E, McKee M. In: Caring for people with chronic conditions: A health system perspective edn. Nolte E, McKee M, editor. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2008. Caring for people with chronic conditions: an introduction.

Publication types