Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun;22(2):131-46.
doi: 10.1017/S2045796012000406. Epub 2012 Jul 26.

Social networks, support and early psychosis: a systematic review

Affiliations

Social networks, support and early psychosis: a systematic review

C Gayer-Anderson et al. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Background. There is strong evidence that those with a long-standing psychotic disorder have fewer social contacts and less social support than comparison groups. There is less research on the extent of social contacts and support prior to or at the onset of psychosis. In the light of recent evidence implicating a range of social experiences and contexts at the onset of psychosis, it is relevant to establish whether social networks and support diminished before or at the time of onset and whether the absence of such supports might contribute to risk, either directly or indirectly. We, therefore, conducted a systematic review of this literature to establish what is currently known about the relationship between social networks, support and early psychosis. Methods. We identified all studies investigating social networks and support in first episode psychosis samples and in general population samples with measures of psychotic experiences or schizotype by conducting systematic searches of electronic databases using pre-defined search terms and criteria. Findings were synthesized using non-quantitative approaches. Results. Thirty-eight papers were identified that met inclusion criteria. There was marked methodological heterogeneity, which limits the capacity to draw direct comparisons. Nonetheless, the existing literature suggests social networks (particularly close friends) and support diminished both among first episode samples and among non-clinical samples reporting psychotic experiences or with schizotype traits, compared with varying comparison groups. These differences may be more marked for men and for those from minority ethnic populations. Conclusions. Tentatively, reduced social networks and support appear to pre-date onset of psychotic disorder. However, the substantial methodological heterogeneity among the existing studies makes comparisons difficult and suggests a need for more robust and comparable studies on networks, support and early psychosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Study selection.

References

    1. Alptekin K, Ulas H, Akdede BB, Tumuklu M, Akvardar Y (2009). Prevalence and risk factors of psychotic symptoms: in the city of Izmir, Turkey. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 44, 905–910. - PubMed
    1. Beels CC (1981). Social support and schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 7, 58–72. - PubMed
    1. Beels CC, Gutwirth L, Berkeley J, Struening E (1984). Measurements of social support in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 10, 399–411. - PubMed
    1. Blanchard JJ, Collins LM, Aghevli M, Leung WW, Cohen AS (2011). Social anhedonia and schizotypy in a community sample: The Maryland Longitudinal Study of Schizotypy. Schizophrenia Bulletin 37, 587–602. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brugha T, Jenkins R, Bebbington P, Meltzer H, Lewis G, Farrell M (2004). Risk factors and the prevalence of neurosis and psychosis in ethnic groups in Great Britain. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 39, 939–946. - PubMed

Publication types