Phase 4 randomized trial of intradermal low-antigen-content inactivated influenza vaccine versus standard-dose intramuscular vaccine in HIV-1-infected adults
- PMID: 22832261
- PMCID: PMC3551875
- DOI: 10.4161/hv.20347
Phase 4 randomized trial of intradermal low-antigen-content inactivated influenza vaccine versus standard-dose intramuscular vaccine in HIV-1-infected adults
Abstract
This study evaluated safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of intradermal (ID) trivalent inactivated split influenza vaccine, with a lower antigen content (9 mcg HA per strain) than the conventional intramuscular one (15 mcg), in HIV-1-infected adults younger than 60 years. A total of 54 HIV-1-positive participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive a single dose of either ID-administered low-antigen-content split inactivated vaccine or intramuscularly-administered (IM) standard-dose inactivated split vaccine. Subjects were provided with a diary to monitor any local and/or systemic reactions to the vaccine for 7 days following vaccination. Serum samples were collected before, 28 days and 90 days after immunization. The plasma HIV-RNA and CD4+ T-lymphocyte count were checked at day 0 and day 90. Serum hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) activity for the three influenza strains included in the vaccine composition was measured to assess the antibody response at one month and 3 months after vaccination. Both vaccines showed optimal safety and tolerability profiles. All the three Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use immunogenicity criteria for vaccine approval in adults younger than 60 were met by both vaccines against A(H1N1) and A(H3N2) viruses. Both vaccines met mean-fold-increase and seroprotection criteria but failed seroconversion criteria against B virus. No difference in terms of post-vaccination geometric mean titers, mean fold increase, seroprotection and seroconversion rates were found comparing ID and IM vaccines. In conclusion, the recently available low-antigen-content ID vaccine is safe, well-tolerated and as immunogenic as IM standard-dose influenza vaccine.
Similar articles
-
Safety and immunogenicity of influenza vaccine among HIV-infected adults: Conventional vaccine vs. intradermal vaccine.Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016;12(2):478-84. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1076599. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016. PMID: 26431466 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Immunogenicity of Standard-Dose Intramuscular Versus Intradermal Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in HIV-Infected Men Who Have Sex With Men in Bangkok, Thailand.Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Feb 1;62(3):383-391. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ884. Epub 2015 Oct 20. Clin Infect Dis. 2016. PMID: 26486702 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of the immunogenicity and safety of a split-virion, inactivated, trivalent influenza vaccine (Fluzone®) administered by intradermal and intramuscular route in healthy adults.Vaccine. 2011 Aug 5;29(34):5666-74. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.06.010. Epub 2011 Jun 23. Vaccine. 2011. PMID: 21699951 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Immunogenicity and Safety of Reduced-Dose Intradermal vs Intramuscular Influenza Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2035693. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35693. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 33560425 Free PMC article.
-
Inactivated split-virion seasonal influenza vaccine (Fluarix): a review of its use in the prevention of seasonal influenza in adults and the elderly.Drugs. 2010 Aug 20;70(12):1519-43. doi: 10.2165/11205020-000000000-00000. Drugs. 2010. PMID: 20687619 Review.
Cited by
-
Fluzone® intra-dermal (Intanza®/Istivac® Intra-dermal): An updated overview.Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016 Oct 2;12(10):2616-2627. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1187343. Epub 2016 May 31. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016. PMID: 27246556 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of vaccine administration modality on immunogenicity and efficacy.Expert Rev Vaccines. 2015;14(11):1509-23. doi: 10.1586/14760584.2015.1081067. Epub 2015 Aug 27. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2015. PMID: 26313239 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Immunogenicity and safety of intradermal influenza vaccine in immunocompromized patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Oct 14;15:427. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1161-z. BMC Infect Dis. 2015. PMID: 26466898 Free PMC article.
-
Influenza vaccination in HIV-positive subjects: latest evidence and future perspective.J Prev Med Hyg. 2013 Mar;54(1):1-10. J Prev Med Hyg. 2013. PMID: 24396998 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Safety and immunogenicity of influenza vaccine among HIV-infected adults: Conventional vaccine vs. intradermal vaccine.Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016;12(2):478-84. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1076599. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016. PMID: 26431466 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of Opportunistic Infections in HIV-Infected Adults and Adolescents MMWR April 10, 2009 / Vol. 58 / No. RR-4. - PubMed
-
- ECDC SIIP Team. ECDC guidance Priority risk groups for influenza vaccination. Stockholm, August 2008.
-
- Crum-Cianflone NF, Eberly LE, Duplessis C, Maguire J, Ganesan A, Faix D, et al. Immunogenicity of a monovalent 2009 influenza A (H1N1) vaccine in an immunocompromised population: a prospective study comparing HIV-infected adults with HIV-uninfected adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:138–46. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq019. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Cooper C, Thorne A, Klein M, Conway B, Boivin G, Haase D, et al. CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network Influenza Vaccine Research Group Immunogenicity is not improved by increased antigen dose or booster dosing of seasonal influenza vaccine in a randomized trial of HIV infected adults. PLoS One. 2011;6:e17758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017758. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous