Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after cesarean section: is it preventable by intraoperative digital dilatation of the internal cervical ostium?
- PMID: 22832395
- DOI: 10.1159/000339936
Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after cesarean section: is it preventable by intraoperative digital dilatation of the internal cervical ostium?
Abstract
Background/aims: It was the aim of this study to determine if intraoperative digital dilatation of the closed internal cervical ostium affects the healing of the uterine scar after a cesarean section (CS).
Methods: In this randomized, prospective study, 94 term pregnant patients who elected to have a CS were assigned to two groups: intraoperative digital dilatation of the internal cervical ostium (group I, n = 48) or no dilatation (group II, n = 46). Vaginal ultrasound was used to check the integrity of the cesarean scar at the uterine incision site 40-42 days after the operation. We calculated the healing ratio based on ultrasonographic results and compared the groups as to the amount of incomplete healing.
Results: The frequency of abnormal scarring was significantly higher in group II (14.3 vs. 40.6%; p < 0.05). The mean healing ratio was significantly higher in group I (0.95 ± 0.12) than in group II (0.87 ± 0.1; p < 0.05). In the multiple logistic regression model, digital dilatation remained the most significant factor affecting abnormal scar formation (odds ratio = 7.7).
Conclusion: Digital dilatation of a closed cervix in elective CS might lower the incidence of abnormal scarring of the uterine incision.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Similar articles
-
Position and integrity of uterine scar are determined by degree of cervical dilatation at time of Cesarean section.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar;57(3):466-470. doi: 10.1002/uog.22053. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 32330331
-
Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section: Is it preventable?Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Jan 1;124(1):32-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.03.023. Epub 2005 Jul 14. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006. PMID: 16023780 Clinical Trial.
-
Standardized ultrasonographic approach for the assessment of risk factors of incomplete healing of the cesarean section scar in the uterus.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Oct;205:141-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.08.032. Epub 2016 Aug 24. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016. PMID: 27591715
-
Cesarean scar imaging and prediction of subsequent obstetric complications.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Dec;55(4):988-96. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e318263c699. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012. PMID: 23090468 Review.
-
Standardized approach for imaging and measuring Cesarean section scars using ultrasonography.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;39(3):252-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.10077. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012. PMID: 21858885 Review.
Cited by
-
Mechanical dilatation of the cervix during elective caeserean section before the onset of labour for reducing postoperative morbidity.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 10;8(8):CD008019. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008019.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30096215 Free PMC article.