Stage-specific breast cancer incidence rates among participants and non-participants of a population-based mammographic screening program
- PMID: 22833199
- PMCID: PMC3751801
- DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2162-x
Stage-specific breast cancer incidence rates among participants and non-participants of a population-based mammographic screening program
Abstract
The Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program was rolled out county by county over the course of a decade, from 1996 to 2005, and now encompasses all Norwegian women aged 50-69 years. We aim to compare DCIS and stage-specific invasive breast cancer incidence rates among participants, non-participants, and women not yet invited to the screening program over this entire implementation period. We estimate stage-specific breast tumor incidence rates for 640,347 women 50-69 years of age invited to the screening program between 1996 and 2007. We compare incidence rates and stage distribution among women diagnosed with breast cancer who were invited and participated, invited but not participated, and women not yet invited to the screening program using two-sided Chi-squared tests to determine statistical significance between groups. The incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) was 3.0 times higher and invasive breast cancer was 1.5 times higher for invited participants compared to invited non-participants (p < 0.001). While the incidence of Stage I cancer was two times higher among participants compared to non-participants (p < 0.001), the incidences of Stages III and IV cancer were two and three times lower, respectively, among participants compared to non-participants (p < 0.001 for both). No significant differences in stage-specific incidence or treatment utilization rates were observed between invited non-participants and not yet invited women, except for stage IV cancers, which were detected at a higher rate among women who were not yet invited (7.5 vs. 4.6 %, p = 0.001). Compared with women invited who did not participate, participants in the screening program are more likely to be diagnosed with DCIS and early stage invasive breast cancer and are less likely to be diagnosed with advanced stage breast cancer. More research is required to determine whether these differences in stage-specific incidences among invited participants and non-participants are associated with differences in mortality rates.
Figures
Comment in
-
Comparing attendees with non-attendees in breast screening does not provide useful information about an effect on prognostic features or mortality.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Nov;136(2):617-8, author reply 619-20. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2250-y. Epub 2012 Sep 26. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012. PMID: 23011508 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
First epidemiological analysis of breast cancer incidence and tumor characteristics after implementation of population-based digital mammography screening.Rofo. 2009 Dec;181(12):1144-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1109831. Epub 2009 Oct 26. Rofo. 2009. PMID: 19859859
-
Trends in detection of invasive cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ at biennial screening mammography in Spain: a retrospective cohort study.PLoS One. 2013 Dec 23;8(12):e83121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083121. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24376649 Free PMC article.
-
Screen detection of ductal carcinoma in situ and subsequent incidence of invasive interval breast cancers: a retrospective population-based study.Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jan;17(1):109-14. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00446-5. Epub 2015 Dec 5. Lancet Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26655422 Free PMC article.
-
Ductal carcinoma in situ: risk factors and impact of screening.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(41):113-6. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq024. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010. PMID: 20956813 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mode of detection and secular time for ductal carcinoma in situ.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(41):142-4. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq028. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010. PMID: 20956819 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Lymph Node Radiotherapy Instead of Extended Axillary Surgery - the New Standard?Breast Care (Basel). 2018 Jul;13(3):173-175. doi: 10.1159/000489892. Epub 2018 Jun 6. Breast Care (Basel). 2018. PMID: 30069177 Free PMC article. Review.
-
European validation of an image-derived AI-based short-term risk model for individualized breast cancer screening-a nested case-control study.Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Dec 6;37:100798. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100798. eCollection 2024 Feb. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023. PMID: 38362558 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of mammography screening programmes on incidence of advanced breast cancer in Europe: a literature review.BMC Cancer. 2018 Sep 3;18(1):860. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4666-1. BMC Cancer. 2018. PMID: 30176813 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Equivalent Survival With Mastectomy or Breast-conserving Surgery Plus Radiation in Young Women Aged < 40 Years With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A National Registry-based Stage-by-Stage Comparison.Clin Breast Cancer. 2015 Oct;15(5):390-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2015.03.012. Epub 2015 Apr 2. Clin Breast Cancer. 2015. PMID: 25957740 Free PMC article.
-
Immunotherapy in Adolescents and Young Adults: What Remains in Cancer Survivors?Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 23;11:736123. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.736123. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34631569 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Vainio H, Bianchini F, editors. IARC handbook of cancer prevention Volume 7 Breast Cancer Screening. IARCPress; Lyon: [Accessed December 7, 2011]. 2002. http://www.iarc.fr.
-
- Food and Drug Administration . Quality Mammography Standards. Final Rules-21 CRF Parts 16 and 900. RIN 0910-AA24 edition. 2011. Department of Health and Human Services; Washington, DC: 1997. pp. 55925–55926. (docket No. 95N-0192)
-
- Screening for Breast Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:716–236. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical