Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2012 Nov;15(5):938-40.
doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs325. Epub 2012 Jul 25.

Ultrasound-guided thoracotomy for implantation of an epicardial left ventricular lead after left pneumonectomy

Affiliations
Case Reports

Ultrasound-guided thoracotomy for implantation of an epicardial left ventricular lead after left pneumonectomy

Guy Vandenplas et al. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

Surgical placement of a left ventricular epicardial pacing lead is a valuable alternative to the standard approach of endovascular placement of a pacing lead in the coronary sinus for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Despite higher perioperative morbidity, surgically placed leads perform well with lower revision and dislocation rates. Moreover, surgery is the only option when an endovascular approach proves to be unsuccessful. We report a successful implantation of an epicardial left ventricular lead through an ultrasound-guided lateral left mini-thoracotomy in a patient with a severely disturbed thoracic anatomy due to left pneumonectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
(a) Chest X-ray showing an extreme leftward displacement of the heart, right atrial (RA) and right ventricular (RV)—shock lead connected to the internal cardiac defibrillator-CRT in the right infraclavicular region. (b) LV dyssynchrony analysis from an RT3DE data set using parametric images. The global time to minimum systolic volume is used as timing reference; early segments are coded in blue, whereas late segments are coded in red. (c) a: conventional site for incision and; b: actual skin incision based on ultrasound guidance. (d) Postoperative chest X-ray with the LV-lead tunnelled around the xyphoid processus.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
(a) CT scan: enlargement of the right lung, lateral displacement of trachea and calcified aorta. (b) CT scan: lateral displaced of the heart and great vessels. (c) CT scan: pacemaker leads in the right atrium and shock-lead in the right ventricle. (d) CT scan: calcified venous bypass, left ventricle adjacent to the thoracic wall.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Marsan NA, Bleeker GB, Ypenburg C, Ghio S, van de Veire NR, Holman ER, et al. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography permits quantification of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony and predicts acute response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008;19:392–9. - PubMed
    1. Coceani M. Guideline challenge: has CRT earned a Class I recommendation? Circ Heart Fail. 2010;3:460–1. - PubMed
    1. Miller AL, Kramer DB, Lewis EF, Koplan B, Epstein LM, Tedrow U. Event-free survival following CRT with surgically implanted LV leads versus standard transvenous approach. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011;34:490–500. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Navia JL, Atik FA, Grimm RA, Garcia M, Vega PR, Myhre U, et al. Minimally invasive left ventricular epicardial lead placement: surgical techniques for heart failure resynchronization therapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:1536–44. - PubMed
    1. Ailawadi G, Lapar DJ, Swenson BR, Maxwell CD, Girotti ME, Bergin JD, et al. Surgically placed left ventricular leads provide similar outcomes to percutaneous leads in patients with failed coronary sinus lead placement. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7:619–25. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms